News Farewell Scully, KMarshall, Narkle, FEvans, Clurey

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I think Scully would have been retained had we been able to send Soldo somewhere. Unfortunately Scully didn't do enough to convince the list committee to keep him in the end. As to rookie listing him, as some have suggested, I don't like his chances.
With four picks in the top 50 and Rome Burgouyne, Louie Montgomery and Barrett likely to be taken late or in the rookie draft I don't think we'll have enough list space unless we cut some more.
 
Think I would’ve kept Scully myself , liked his basics , marking and kicking and his height. He was a bit stiff in his movements but thought he was worth another year to make sure he wasn’t going to make it .
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Its annoying that Evans played the last 11 games and Natkle the last 13. Could have thrown some of them to Lorenz and Jackson really
 
Is the only "raw tall" developed under Hinkley D Howard

What's the point of you picking them if you're only going to give them one pre season?
 
Scully is like 19-20 years old and about 205cm. He's still a kid. Apart from the odd freak bigs take years to develop. Bizarre delisting to cut him after just 2 years, almost like why draft him in the first place? He'd take the odd strong grab in the wasteland that is our SANFL forward line.

Just another shit call from a club that is all about shit calls.

Mac and cheese is worse than narkle and Evans but nah ditch them first. Another of kernys little favourites. Probably likes greyhounds. What a joke.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Farewell Scully, KMarshall, Narkle, FEvans, Clurey

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top