McEntee might be in trouble if there is a guy in the draft or that we can rookie in the draft.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Someone (can't remember who) wrote that Scully would likely be delisted if Hinkley wasn't remaining. Anyone write that?
McEntee might be in trouble if there is a guy in the draft or that we can rookie in the draft.
I wasn't happy about the McEntee resigning.McEntee will be in trouble if Ken departs at the end of 2025 and Mc Entee is uncontracted. I cannot decide which will cause me the biggest melt, re signing Ken or re signing Jed McEntee.
Offering Mc Entee a two year contract is possibly the most puzzling decision I can remember in our AFL era. It just edges out re signing Hinkley before last year's finals had been decided.
It was Coobk001 thanks to Ford Fairlane .I thought it but don't remember posting it. Or did I think that about any one of half a dozen other players? I can't remember but it sounds like something I would think and might post.
Yes. 100%.
Depends on whether he negotiates a settlement. There's no reason to believe he has negotiated anything other than asking Port to delist him so he can move to another club.
Yeah I think you are correct, as far as I know Tom asked to be released from his contract,
He may not play on although asking to be released from his contract suggests he has a commitment from another club to take him on.
Cool that Clurey ripped up his own contract.
When clubs make these decisions this is the thing we don’t see,‘personality. Maybe he needs the age cut to pull his finger out!Yes, I can confirm that Scully himself personally thought his best chance of remaining was if Ken stayed. He obviously did, but unfortunately for him it didn't matter. He found out on Friday that he was gone.
Scully was told he just doesn't have that competitive mongrel and work ethic they want. They tried to get it out of him, but he didn't exhibit it and they don't believe he will make it based on that. To be honest, looks like he'll just be the next Redden, Mitch Harvey type, that will probably go onto have a good SANFL career but just might not have been up to AFL.
So the club is lying?He didn't ask to be released, have a commitment from another club, or "rip up his own contract".
His time at AFL level may be up, but let's put to bed the idea he was the one to do the walking away.
He may not play on although asking to be released from his contract suggests he has a commitment from another club to take him on. Either way I can't get my head around the club having to pay him for a contract he is not fulfilling.