ITCHY EYEBALLS
I see you watching me watching you
Head to open, Marsh and Green both play
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think it's the right call to play Marsh first up, but agreed - pull the pin pretty quickly and bring Green back in if it's clear MM's form hasn't held up from that amazing restart in the test team.The far more likely scenario is Marsh being dropped after a couple of dud tests. He wont have a long leash.
Head's already said he's not going to open.Head to open, Marsh and Green both play
It's not a D/N Test so the breaks will just be as normal. The match starts at 10:20 AWST, 40 mins lunch, 20 mins tea.I can't seem to find it anywhere - what are the playing times for the first test?
I see it starts at 1:20 AWST, but is the long break the first one or the second one? I can't remember how they do it in D/N tests.
It shouldn’t come down to that really. Bison and Green are competing for one spot, the opener should be a completely different discussion. Green will be back in the team very quickly, either for Bison or potentially one of the bowlers. I wouldn’t mind seeing him bat higher, but his scores need to justify that move. Out of Bangers, Harris or Renshaw I’m leaning to Renshaw due to age and his recent performance in the pm xi game. Harris and bangers are much of a muchness for me, both have flaws, both older so I worry whether they will be able to fix them.As I said before if the replacement comes down to Bancroft renshaw Harris or green .. I would pick greenie hands down
Ahh cool. I wish more websites would include time zones when publishing this stuff!It's not a D/N Test so the breaks will just be as normal. The match starts at 10:20 AWST, 40 mins lunch, 20 mins tea.
Probably.I'm guessing the odd starting time of 10:20 is so the second session finishes at 6pm AEST for east coast news?
No, it's still most of the time the fastest and bounciest in Aus.Is the Perth hard bouncing wicket a myth these days?
Don't think that's very true of Marsh anymore. He doesn't bowl anywhere near as much as he once did.And neither Marsh or Green are in the best seven bats in the country, they are all rounders and picked because they bat and bowl.
This is a good point. Head and Marnus are probably our 2 best bats these days (Smith is on a fair decline), what has Green done to warrant messing them up to fit him in? It's not like he has a wealth of form that shows you can't possibly leave him out and you just have to find a way to fit him in.messing with heads position or marnus just to accommodate green and marsh seems nuts to me
The openers should be a separate discussion, but the rather bare cupboard (and the fact we will be needing two in the next 18 months or so) is what's driving the more unusual discussions. I reckon even if Bancroft is first cab off the rank, comes in and does well, the same discussion will rear it's head when Khawaja retires, because an opening duo of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw seems very flakey.It shouldn’t come down to that really. Bison and Green are competing for one spot, the opener should be a completely different discussion. Green will be back in the team very quickly, either for Bison or potentially one of the bowlers. I wouldn’t mind seeing him bat higher, but his scores need to justify that move. Out of Bangers, Harris or Renshaw I’m leaning to Renshaw due to age and his recent performance in the pm xi game. Harris and bangers are much of a muchness for me, both have flaws, both older so I worry whether they will be able to fix them.
How many teams around the world really have 2 set openers at any given time? Most have maybe 1 set opener while the other is usually something of a revolving door.The openers should be a separate discussion, but the rather bare cupboard (and the fact we will be needing two in the next 18 months or so) is what's driving the more unusual discussions. I reckon even if Bancroft is first cab off the rank, comes in and does well, the same discussion will rear it's head when Khawaja retires, because an opening duo of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw seems very flakey.
True, but the combinations of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw leave you with no set opener. You'd be hoping Renshaw establishes himself for the long-term as the youngest of the three. But I would be worried that we would often by 2-very little with those line-ups and Marnus would be effectively opening anyway. I prefer a traditional set-up but I can see why the conversation is being had.How many teams around the world really have 2 set openers at any given time? Most have maybe 1 set opener while the other is usually something of a revolving door.
India relatively recently have Gill and Rohit but for a long time it was Rohit and whoever was lucky enough to get picked.
England always had just a guy at the other end during Cooks career, and only recently have settled on 2 openers - 1 of which is very average but is picked on potential so even that's not a straight up 2 set opener situation.
Elgar has been South Africas set opener for a while but hasn't had a legit partner.
NZ have Latham and whoever.
So this idea that we have to pick the next opener who will be "the guy" doesn't really line up with history or how most teams are set up. Most of the time it's next cab off the rank who is at least in form, and hope they can at least do a job for a while. Ideally your other opener leads the way, which would be the case with Khawaja and whoever is picked.
Warner for a long time had a big rotation of openers. Rogers came good for a brief period then it was scattered again until Khawaja came good. It's really not an unusual position to be in, rather it's pretty much the standard position and if you do have 2 you are very fortunate.
This has already been happening the past 2 or 3 years anyway with Warner being so hopeless so it's not a change for Marnus. Most of the time the no.3 is in in the first 5 overs and essentially opening anyway - even with 2 good openers. The effect is probably more on the no.4 as both openers are more likely to go instead of just 1.True, but the combinations of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw leave you with no set opener. You'd be hoping Renshaw establishes himself for the long-term as the youngest of the three. But I would be worried that we would often by 2-very little with those line-ups and Marnus would be effectively opening anyway. I prefer a traditional set-up but I can see why the conversation is being had.
Absolutely, I just don’t think weakening the order/ moving Green up should really be on the table currently.The openers should be a separate discussion, but the rather bare cupboard (and the fact we will be needing two in the next 18 months or so) is what's driving the more unusual discussions. I reckon even if Bancroft is first cab off the rank, comes in and does well, the same discussion will rear it's head when Khawaja retires, because an opening duo of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw seems very flakey.
More than last year but not by much looking at ticket master. I got a decent seat for day 3 pretty easily, if the match is still interesting by then.What will the crowd be? Will Western Australians turn up?
All the more reason to try and get a Warner replacement established now, before Khawaja goes.The openers should be a separate discussion, but the rather bare cupboard (and the fact we will be needing two in the next 18 months or so) is what's driving the more unusual discussions. I reckon even if Bancroft is first cab off the rank, comes in and does well, the same discussion will rear it's head when Khawaja retires, because an opening duo of Bancroft/Harris, Bancroft/Renshaw or Harris/Renshaw seems very flakey.
I planning general admin so will just buy my ticket on the day, hopefully a few others doing the same.More than last year but not by much looking at ticket master. I got a decent seat for day 3 pretty easily, if the match is still interesting by then.
There's a sizeable Pakistani community here which probably props it up.
bit harsh on green - he's certainly in the best 7 bats in the country (can bowl and outstanding fielder).
who are the 7 batsmen better than him ?