Yeah but the fatal flaw in that argument is that he (allegedly) did not respect his wife, so IMHO it stands.And while we are at it picking holes in the letter and more generally...
We have been able to draw conclusions on here that it was a (horrific) mistake and he was not actually hacked. But somehow some have not been able to connect the dots further to ascertain that she was not randomly chosen to send the pic too in the first place. There has to be some form of existing relationship there. So as much as the thought of Seyers junk might repulse many, I think we can safely assume in this instance that it was consensual/invited in some way. Therefore, until evidence comes to light to the contrary, I think this has very little impact on the Carlton Respects program.