Re: Future Magpies Watch '11
Witts has PLENTY of weaknesses however Quigley said that he would take Hartley over Witts which is the point I was focussed on. I completely agree with his analysis of Witts however to say that he would take Hartley over Witts when weighing up all variables that amount to potential only, Witts wins hands down.
Love that he was so positive on Hartley though - I've read from other posts that the general consensus on him is quite mixed and that the particular game he played on Patton was by far and away his best with his others being mediocre at best.
But what did he really say about his weaknesses? That is currently isn't using his height to advantage, and that he doesn't yet move all that well around the ground. Hard to disagree with either of them.
And he said that some supporters are massively overrating him? That seems right at this stage as well.
No issue with the overview of Witts - I was more pleasantly surprised with the glowing review of Hartley (although this came after watching Hartley's only really top end game of the champs, so he would be forgiven for thinking this was the norm, rather than the exception).
Witts has PLENTY of weaknesses however Quigley said that he would take Hartley over Witts which is the point I was focussed on. I completely agree with his analysis of Witts however to say that he would take Hartley over Witts when weighing up all variables that amount to potential only, Witts wins hands down.
Love that he was so positive on Hartley though - I've read from other posts that the general consensus on him is quite mixed and that the particular game he played on Patton was by far and away his best with his others being mediocre at best.