Tony Cochrane 100%So you've got the Chair of the GC Suns and the Chair of the NQ Cowboys
You reckon these guys will want to give the Lions a new stadium?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Tony Cochrane 100%So you've got the Chair of the GC Suns and the Chair of the NQ Cowboys
You reckon these guys will want to give the Lions a new stadium?
i reckon we will get Vic Park, built in line with perth stadium funding model so state's cost will be limited to 40% of the total cost, with private sector picking up the 60% in return for 30 years exclusive rights.
i reckon there is a chance they will cancel the indoor stadium and instead do swimming at Gold Coast
The feds funding agreement will shift same quantum of funding to stadium
Isn't the Brisbane Live venue tied into Federal funding? Why would it be canned?i reckon we will get Vic Park, built in line with perth stadium funding model so state's cost will be limited to 40% of the total cost, with private sector picking up the 60% in return for 30 years exclusive rights.
i reckon there is a chance they will cancel the indoor stadium and instead do swimming at Gold Coast
The feds funding agreement will shift same quantum of funding to stadium
Currently, yes. But, the Government is apparently keen on re-arranging that deal like Palaszczuk did after Labor won the Federal election.Isn't the Brisbane Live venue tied into Federal funding? Why would it be canned?
For me Brisbane Arena/Live should never have got considered for any funding in the first place.Isn't the Brisbane Live venue tied into Federal funding? Why would it be canned?
And yet we also have this.
Trying to work out what the government will or should do is very frustrating
Necessity of 'new venues' included in 100-day review
“New” venues have been included in the scope of the Games Independent Infrastructure and Coordination Authority 100-day review.
But it’s understood only ones that have already been proposed excluding highly touted proposals at Victoria Park and Hamilton.
Not needed. Do it post Olympics at Gabba site.Isn't the Brisbane Live venue tied into Federal funding? Why would it be canned?
Election results had to be fully counted and certified first. Also, the review couldn't start until the group was created, which needed Parliament to legislate it.So they take 30 days to start the 100 day review
There will be no new stadium
I don’t believe we need a new stadium
The soft landing is painfully slow but moving in the right direction, I suppose.
Because politicians are gonna politick. They spend far more time worrying about their political points and the optics of things, rather than just getting on with things.I still dunno why he even puts himself in this position though. Why not just say 'look I've said all along I don't think we need a new stadium, but it's in the hands of the review committee now and I don't want to predict or influence due process'.
I still dunno why he even puts himself in this position though. Why not just say 'look I've said all along I don't think we need a new stadium, but it's in the hands of the review committee now and I don't want to predict or influence due process'.
I think because ultimately it is his government that is going to have to make a call and saying the above can be pitched as an effective backflip when there is now going to be 100 days of dead air. And importantly we don’t know what the report will say.
His position is already watered down but to the average voter it sounds unchanged.
It may slowly be watered down even further over the next few months in the lead up to the release of the report once they have a better idea of what it’ll say.
Do you think he already knows what he wants and has chosen specific people he knows on the committee, to spit out a certain result? It kinda feels that way to me, coz usually these situations they say 'Let's wait till the process runs it's course' but he can't help but to give opinions when questioned.
Election results had to be fully counted and certified first. Also, the review couldn't start until the group was created, which needed Parliament to legislate it.
100 per cent. A bit of a loose cannon but he's been big on growing the game in QLD.I reckon Cochrane would. AFL for AFL.
Brisbane Live was needed before the Olympics was announced, and not as a sporting venue. Delaying it until after the olympics doesn't make sense when there is dedicated funding.Not needed. Do it post Olympics at Gabba site.
Because he's way too skittish as a politician. He told people what he thought they wanted to hear while in opposition, and now he feels he can't deviate from that. He dug a hole for himself and would rather keep digging than just climb out.I still dunno why he even puts himself in this position though. Why not just say 'look I've said all along I don't think we need a new stadium, but it's in the hands of the review committee now and I don't want to predict or influence due process'
Also makes sense to delay it until after the Olympics, as it isn’t necessarily required for the Olympics.Brisbane Live was needed before the Olympics was announced, and not as a sporting venue. Delaying it until after the olympics doesn't make sense when there is dedicated funding.
I honestly think that most people want a new stadium especially for an Olympics Games. The fear he would have had was for the Campaign that Labour would have run against him, had he said that he will build a new Stadium.Because he's way too skittish as a politician. He told people what he thought they wanted to hear while in opposition, and now he feels he can't deviate from that. He dug a hole for himself and would rather keep digging than just climb out.