Throw in mark williams while we’re at itLet’s get simmo into the hawthorn staff and start collecting former coaches like infinity stones. first ratten, now simmo.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 21
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Throw in mark williams while we’re at itLet’s get simmo into the hawthorn staff and start collecting former coaches like infinity stones. first ratten, now simmo.
Dew is the whole gauntletIs Dew an infinity stone or an infinity boulder?
So what’s the tipping on the Heeney appeal tonight?
I’m thinking he’ll get off, Dilligan has no doubt had a word in the right ear.
But it's AFL chook lotto, so who knows. Would be a travesty if he went for that though, I think the fact Heeney drew blood made it look worse than it was. To be denied a potential Chas for that would be criminal.
When I first saw the footage I had to rewatch it twice more as I couldn’t even tell what the contact was meant to be.So what’s the tipping on the Heeney appeal tonight?
I’m thinking he’ll get off, Dilligan has no doubt had a word in the right ear.
But it's AFL chook lotto, so who knows. Would be a travesty if he went for that though, I think the fact Heeney drew blood made it look worse than it was. To be denied a potential Chas for that would be criminal.
I quite agree that he should not have been suspended for that. However, he has been found guilty - twice. The AFL must be consistent. Overturning the decision now just smacks of incompetence. It is not as if there is any new mitigating evidence.So what’s the tipping on the Heeney appeal tonight?
I’m thinking he’ll get off, Dilligan has no doubt had a word in the right ear.
But it's AFL chook lotto, so who knows. Would be a travesty if he went for that though, I think the fact Heeney drew blood made it look worse than it was. To be denied a potential Chas for that would be criminal.
appeal failed.
The AFL and consistency? Yeah nah.I quite agree that he should not have been suspended for that. However, he has been found guilty - twice. The AFL must be consistent. Overturning the decision now just smacks of incompetence. It is not as if there is any new mitigating evidence.
My god - you would think that he had a career ending injury - ITS ONE WEEK
My god - you would think that he had a career ending injury - ITS ONE WEEK
#putyourbootsout
Flags to be flown at half mast today in Sydney.
I don't care if the suspension is warranted or not, suck shit you bunch of entitled flogs.
Only 7 weeks until they become the Bloods againHow can this be? We are continually told they have the best culture
Every time a player is suspended the media cohort starts questioning whether the rules should be changed for Brownlow eligibility.
I don't know why they keep talking about it. This is what the Brownlow is. Just stop releasing the coaches votes every week and save it for a ceremony, at least that way you've got the people who actually know which players had an impact and a more valuable award. Always hated how much value was put on an umpire voted award with such a shameful history of players being screwed over or in Geoff Raines' case completely ignored.
Give a vote penalty. Eg 1 match 1 vote, 2 matches 3 votes, 3 matches 6 votes....I think it's really cringe that the media is heading this way.
The BnF has always been the best and fairest. Calls to change that are ridiculous and should continue to be shot down by the AFL.
Every time a player is suspended the media cohort starts questioning whether the rules should be changed for Brownlow eligibility.
I don't know why they keep talking about it. This is what the Brownlow is. Just stop releasing the coaches votes every week and save it for a ceremony, at least that way you've got the people who actually know which players had an impact and a more valuable award. Always hated how much value was put on an umpire voted award with such a shameful history of players being screwed over or in Geoff Raines' case completely ignored.
Need to include fines as well so people like Dangerflog don't miss out.Give a vote penalty. Eg 1 match 1 vote, 2 matches 3 votes, 3 matches 6 votes....
Still keeps the fairest aspect and emphasis on best
They just jump to the opposite of whatever the situation is leaning too. He'd bemoan the loss of tradition if the AFL came and changed it.I think it's really cringe that the media is heading this way.
The BnF has always been the best and fairest. Calls to change that are ridiculous and should continue to be shot down by the AFL.
That requires too much faith in grading and has too much room for interpretation on what is a football action. As much as it seems unfair, a suspension is a suspension.I reckon the eligibility should be based on intentional gradings only. And that's intentional in terms of performing an illegal action like striking, kicking, tripping, spitting, etc. Not "football actions" like tackles and trying to push away from an opponent who is holding on to you.