Get Fev: yes or no?

Remove this Banner Ad

Nup, there was worse.

Yeah, I was only being half-serious. No doubt Fevola disgraced himself in a D&D performance with more embarrassing moments than having an extended dig at his captain. I can imagine the sorts of things that might have gone on, but I still have my doubts that it was as serious as some of the other incidents that have gone on involving other players in recent (and not so recent) times.

In light of Fevola's previous transgressions and the persistent spotlight that Carlton has had regarding player behaviour and cover-ups, they have really had their backs to the wall with regards to how to handle the situation.

Personally I think suspending Fevola (S.Johnson got 6 weeks at Geelong) and then make him work his way back into the team through the reserves would be more effective. In the case that it backfires, Fevola would be the one looking poorly as opposed to the club. On the flip-side, if Carlton don't end up trading Fevola, they'd be stupid not to suspend him, as it will only end up looking as though he has got off without punishment and they'll look as though they are unable to manage their players if there are any further transgressions.
 
Its clear that Fev's antics at the Brownlow have not been fully revealed.

I don't think he did anything criminal, but there are suspicions that he did something that utterly burned his bridges with the Carlton playing group.

Anyway, my issue with Fev coming to Brisbane isn't behaviorial, it's that it doesn't improve our side to a degree that justifies the cost, and may set us back long term in a big way.

No to Fev.

There was criminal activity..... Fev stole the limelight...from a very dull Andrew Demetriou.....:p
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Remove this Banner Ad

Get Fev: yes or no?

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top