Review Grade your team's trade period

[stallon]

Yeah I don't mind the split of 3 when you consider the lack of top end stand outs, just 14 for Baker. Just feels like, why would you do it? At least get a 20s pick back from Richmond

We did it because our list manager is dumb and committed too early

 

[Barrybran]

Yeah I don't mind the split of 3 when you consider the lack of top end stand outs, just 14 for Baker. Just feels like, why would you do it? At least get a 20s pick back from Richmond

We did it because our list manager is dumb and committed too early

The timing of the trades didn't help either. When the Baker trade did happen, Richmond had already traded out their useful picks so they had nothing to give us.

 

[Hamingja]

B

Went entirely as expected.

First pick and steak knives for Smith. No other activity.

Kept all of our future picks which I think is important. We may well trade back into the draft on the night if there is someone left we really like but on balance our picks next year are more likely to be better than our picks from this year so better to sacrifice this year instead.

End of the day if Smith gets back to his best form it will be an A. If Smith ends up a disaster it will be a F. Not a lot of middle ground when we look back at this in 5 years time.

 

[Cleric]

Crows, a B+.
The reason I say that is because we wanted Luko, and if we had of got him as well for a F1, it would have been a A+.
Not getting everything we wanted does drop us down a grade.

 

[Philth]

B.

Got good picks for the departing players, but I would have preferred to keep Baker & Rioli.

We will miss their leadership and class next year. Badly.