Graham Cornes on the Edwards - McLeod feud

Remove this Banner Ad

Toots Hibbert

Brownlow Medallist
Veteran 10k Posts RIP
Oct 14, 2004
19,285
100
Adelaide
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Man U,Packers,Feyenoord
A feud to defuse

Graham Cornes
October 14, 2006 12:15am
Article from: The Advertiser

http://www.news.com.au/adelaidenow/story/0,22606,20578414-21543,00.html

IT all started with Tyson Edwards standing at the bar of the Stanford Plaza on North Terrace after the Crows Club Champion presentation early last Saturday.

He was blissfully unaware that Rachel McLeod was behind him, holding her thumb and forefinger, in the shape of an "L", up to his head.

It could have been nothing more than a playful gesture - we've all done the "rabbit's ears" to our mates when standing behind them in photos - but given the recent history between the two families, that seems highly unlikely. The gesture means "loser", and it didn't go unnoticed by Edwards' wife Mandy, who was sitting close by.

Mandy Edwards' frustrations erupted as she took serious issue with the insult and rushed to defend the honour of her husband. From there the incident deteriorated, as the normally mild-mannered Tyson Edwards imposed himself into the verbal altercation, to the point where the security guards felt compelled to hover and the Edwards subsequently departed.

In the torrent of words and accusations that ensued, a glass of water was thrown and a glass broken. As happens when most altercations escalate; reason and rationale disappear. The dispute, which developed nearly two years ago now, seems no closer to resolution.

The Crows No. 1 ticket-holder, and most loyal global supporter and ambassador, Lleyton Hewitt has been embroiled in the dispute.

It is not a comfortable situation for Hewitt whose friendship with the Edwards family has strengthened in recent times, to the point where Hewitt is even considering whether if relinquishing his prestigious position in the club would help defuse the situation.

The pugnacious Hewitt rarely walks away from a scrap, but he is fiercely protective of family and friends, and he would support Tyson Edwards to that extent.

We've seen nothing like this in a football club before; an intense feud between two families who are both so important to the team. Of course, football clubs have had their divisions along family or factional lines before, but never have they been played out so publicly. The contrast between the two women seems stark.

Mandy Edwards is a quiet, almost retiring, mother of three boys, which often masks her strength, intelligence and resolve. Rachel McLeod is much more visible in the public eye, extroverted and sociable, but strong and determined in her own right. Both are fiercely protective of their husbands, so regardless of who is perceived to be right or wrong, that quality must be admired.

However, this is a serious issue for the Adelaide Football Club and its resolution is using far more time and resources than it should. At a time when trading players and preparing for a draft takes priority, Neil Craig, Steven Trigg and John Reid are forced to tread warily around an emotional minefield of jealousy and accusations.

It is true that Craig and Reid have met with both players, but the club's strategy is interesting. There were no ultimatums, as has previously been reported. Rather they laid out the facts, and compelled the players to consider what the end result to all this fuss could be.

They were also asked to consider what the alternative would be if the issue could not be resolved. Both players are smart enough and team-oriented enough to work that out. Obviously one of them would have to go. But trade week is over, so neither of them will go anywhere, unless one of them chooses to retire.

One thing the club is doing is taking great care not to apportion blame. Most of us in the media and in the general football public have formed our own opinions. But whether that opinion be informed or intuitive, the club is having none of it. The issue has to be resolved with the reputations and self-esteem of both parties intact. Such is the secret to successful diplomacy.

One ex-player's wife made a telling observation in the wake of last week's controversy.

"This would never have happened if Malcolm Blight was still here," she said. Her reasoning was two-fold. First, Blight never played favourites; second, Blight's wife Patsy was a wonderful off-field support to the senior coach, and her rapport with the players' wives and girl-friends eased a lot of those off-field pressures.

"That all changed when Malcolm left," she lamented, although she admits she has no insight to today's structures.

A wise old coach once told me, that if a talented player was struggling, there could be only one of two reasons: either he had problems at work, or he had problems at home. In the old days he was right, but the football club today is the players' work place, so domestic harmony becomes even more important.

Intriguingly, despite the distractions, both Edwards and McLeod had very good seasons.

But it is obvious to those who know them that the acrimony between the two wives is affecting them. Friendships between footy mates are supposed to be spontaneous, and natural, and if left to their own devices that is exactly how McLeod and Edwards would relate. But it's gone beyond that.

You don't have to like everyone that you play footy with, but almost overwhelmingly, you do.

Occasionally there are dramas and scandals within football clubs, but I suspect a lot less so than in life out there in the real world. Only two things can heal this festering issue and they are compromise and tolerance. If they can't compromise on their differences, at least tolerate them.

Failing that, as the grand old statesman of the Adelaide Football Club, Bill Sanders, has said repeatedly: "The club will always win".

Unfortunately, when the club wins, someone loses.
 
Toots Hibbert said:
We've seen nothing like this in a football club before; an intense feud between two families who are both so important to the team.

I guess the Carey, Archer, Stevens fued at North Melbourne doesn't rank?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Asty said:
I guess the Carey, Archer, Stevens fued at North Melbourne doesn't rank?

No feud. Stevens found out and Carey was gone within days.

McLeods missus comes across as a skanky, status seeking, social climbing, harpie. She has issues.
 
I Point the blame to- Rachel McLeod only for the reason that shes a complete loser and tries to makes sure andrew has no friends. Look at the Leyton Hewitt incedint just because she was friends with Kim Clijsters and they broke up Andrew and Leyton could not be friends anymore. And now doing some L shaped thing to Tyson Edwards, What is she 5?

Dont let the bitchy surface fool you. there is an even bigger bitch underneath that surface

ITS TIME TO GO RACHEL MCLEOD
 
And of course every AFC supporters' favourite journo - The Rooch - has done a two page Insight special into the feud (p.8-9 of today's tiser) - Real life Soap Opera.

This issue is becoming a bit of a nightmare for the crows.

At least Rachel seems to get on well with the Port players' wives ... ;)

After this year's Brownlow count - where Mrs McLeod, with the infamous body art of Andrew's No. 23 sparkling across her back - slipped away from the Crows table after the count to socialise at the Port Adelaide table, the controversy deepened.
 
Grave Danger said:
And who was the 'estranged' wife who put copies of her husband's contract in the letterboxes of other players and sold his medals to Cash Converters...?


what **** are you dribbling??
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PerthCrow said:
Why is it becoming a nightmare? Its dragged on in the media way too long , long after the club has resolved all issues regarding the feud

??? Your kidding yourself right?

http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2006/10/13/1160246328867.html

In an ugly encounter at an Adelaide nightclub after the Malcolm Blight Medal count on October 6, a drink was thrown and a glass smashed by one of the women. Harsh words were exchanged.

That was 8 days ago. I know a week is a long time in footy but I thinking these wounds will take a long time to heal.
 
RizzoTheRat said:
??? Your kidding yourself right?

http://www.realfooty.theage.com.au/realfooty/articles/2006/10/13/1160246328867.html

In an ugly encounter at an Adelaide nightclub after the Malcolm Blight Medal count on October 6, a drink was thrown and a glass smashed by one of the women. Harsh words were exchanged.

That was 8 days ago. I know a week is a long time in footy but I thinking these wounds will take a long time to heal.
Yes ..but the players have been already dragged in and told in no uncertain terms this behaviour is not acceptable. Yet the media are carrying on as if world war 3 has broken out. The players have been proffessional enough on field ... so at the end of the day who cares what their wives do.

GC had a point when he said if there is a problem it is either work or home..yet the players have shown their proffessionalism so it is not an issue
 
PerthCrow said:
Yes ..but the players have been already dragged in and told in no uncertain terms this behaviour is not acceptable. Yet the media are carrying on as if world war 3 has broken out. The players have been proffessional enough on field ... so at the end of the day who cares what their wives do.

GC had a point when he said if there is a problem it is either work or home..yet the players have shown their proffessionalism so it is not an issue

If you think the issue has been resolved, then you have your head in the sand. The players might have been told, but there are steps being put in place for long term mediation/counselling - which means the issue is far from over.

And the problem is - as is indicated in Rucci's article - that players WAGs are taking sides, which will draw players into opposing camps if this is not sorted quickly.
 
Ford Fairlane said:
If you think the issue has been resolved, then you have your head in the sand. The players might have been told, but there are steps being put in place for long term mediation/counselling - which means the issue is far from over.

And the problem is - as is indicated in Rucci's article - that players WAGs are taking sides, which will draw players into opposing camps if this is not sorted quickly.
So Rucci is a truthteller? Tell the truth about Wazza and the separate camps at Port Adelaide

I think this is media driven and not as big an issue as the soapy lovers think it is.
 
PerthCrow said:
Yes ..but the players have been already dragged in and told in no uncertain terms this behaviour is not acceptable.

It's not the players behaviour that is the lightning rod. At least the function season is over and the wives won't have any reason to clash in public for a while. Still, it wouldn't be the best work environment for the rest of the players come pre-season training knowing relations between two leaders of the club are frosty at best.
 
RizzoTheRat said:
It's not the players behaviour that is the lightning rod. At least the function season is over and the wives won't have any reason to clash in public for a while. Still, it wouldn't be the best work environment for the rest of the players come pre-season training knowing relations between two leaders of the club are frosty at best.
I think the 2 players have already shown they can work on the field , and that would be seen by the other players. So to me ..no issue
 
PerthCrow said:
So Rucci is a truthteller? .....I think this is media driven and not as big an issue as the soapy lovers think it is.
People such as you have comforted yourselves with the thought that it's just Rucci stirring the pot but now that Graham Cornes has weighed in surely you can see that this is actually a major problem and has been for a long time.
 
Having been (still reserve the right to cautiously remain so ) a critic of Rucci.... given a delicate AFC issue I think his article was FAIR, UNBIASED and informative.... and supported by Cornes version (although there are slight and expected differences) WELL DONE TO BOTH... it is has been a mystery from afar as to some of the details.

BIMBO's unfortunately to footballers (esp in SA) attract them like bees to pollen.... Paris Hilton could take lessons in SA

OK I'll take sides.... on a guess.....Rachel STFU!.. then again ....maybe keep it up and destroy the life and honour you are looking for!.. not to mention embarrasment of your quiet achieving husband and his club!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Graham Cornes on the Edwards - McLeod feud

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top