Add Weitering, or as we saw in 2024, De Koning.I don’t think Carlton can cover any of Cripps, Walsh or Curnow if any go down for any length of time.
Brittle and shallow - Carlton's list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Add Weitering, or as we saw in 2024, De Koning.I don’t think Carlton can cover any of Cripps, Walsh or Curnow if any go down for any length of time.
How would the Pies go without Moore and N.Daicos atm?Add Weitering, or as we saw in 2024, De Koning.
Brittle and shallow - Carlton's list.
relevance?How would the Pies go without Moore and N.Daicos atm?
Because every team would struggle without their star players.relevance?
this is the carlton thread
But Carlton have had all their star players for the last 3 years, and have failed to even contend for a flag, let alone win one.Because every team would struggle without their star players.
Brisbane winning the flag without Neale and Andrews?
By ur bizarre definitions maybeBut Carlton have had all their star players for the last 3 years, and have failed to even contend for a flag, let alone win one.
Yes, it is indeed bizarre that someone would only consider a team a premiership contender if they actually genuinely contend for a premiership.By ur bizarre definitions maybe
Collingwood has a 75% win rate in games without these players under McRaeHow would the Pies go without Moore and N.Daicos atm?
And whats our win rate under Voss without Cripps?Collingwood has a 75% win rate in games without these players under McRae
Tell us more about this statement, remembering it's AFL not NBA?I see Carlton as similar as they have the stars in every area of the ground like we had.
Cripps has missed 3 games in 3 years under Voss (None of them finals), and Carlton have won 2 of them. One being against 2023 West Coast.And whats our win rate under Voss without Cripps?
But Carlton have had all their star players for the last 3 years, and have failed to even contend for a flag, let alone win one.
Not surprisedCripps has missed 3 games in 3 years under Voss (None of them finals), and Carlton have won 2 of them. One being against 2023 West Coast.
Not sure what your point is?
Are you suggesting Carlton have been a premiership contender in recent years (they haven't), and/or they are a premiership contender in 2025 (time will tell who contends for the premiership).
As it stands, Carlton haven't contended for the premiership for a quarter of a century.
Interesting comparison. Dusty won Richmond's BnF in 2016 and he was 25 years old at the time. Rance finished second and was 27 years old. Cotchin finished third and was 26 years old. All three in their prime and still several years before they hit their 30s.The Richmond list had peaked and was over after 2016. I see Carlton as similar as they have the stars in every area of the ground like we had. Just takes a while for a club coming from the bottom to work out the right pieces around them. They can challenge for the next 4 or so years.
Cripps - 29Interesting comparison. Dusty won Richmond's BnF in 2016 and he was 25 years old at the time. Rance finished second and was 27 years old. Cotchin finished third and was 26 years old. All three in their prime and still several years before they hit their 30s.
Cripps won Carlton's BnF this year and he's about to turn 30. Nic Newman finished second and he's turning 32 in January. Sam Walsh finished third and he's 24. With the exception of Walsh, it's pretty evident that Carlton's list is older than Richmond's was in 2016 when you compare their best players.
I wasn't necessarily saying they were old. I was just comparing them to Richmond in 2016. What did Richmond's core look like at the end of 2016 when they were just about to open a four year premiership window?Cripps - 29
Curnow - 27
Weitering - 27
Mckay - 27
Walsh - 24
TDK - 25
Cerra - 25
Our core isn't that old
Is that Cripps in disguise?
All I am saying is that the Blues have a list that is as good as the premiers, on paper. The major jump in performance is likely to be in the head and tactical. It's unlikely that the quality of the list will improve in the short run. But the team can get better.
To be very clear i am saying that if the Blues can get their $h!t together they can go all the way. But in my opinion the jump is likely to be due to tactics and culture - that's all.
You would die for the chance to lose a GF you've been that shitCan I infer that your criteria for contending for a premiership is making the grand final?
Given Collingwood's history of making, and then losing, grand finals I am not surprised.
29 grand final losses. You must be proud