Don't you just hate it when he has a set shot from 30m? I always assume a miss and am nearly always right....
Unfortunately you're right. I can't understand why no teammate calls for a handball.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't you just hate it when he has a set shot from 30m? I always assume a miss and am nearly always right....
You pick the best 22 based on who is available and who is in form. Am I missing something?
Our recent premiership teams had 30 players who could step into the team "plug and play". We've perhaps got the start of regenerating something like that again. But it's only a start.
I agree.
I have thought the same about Gibbo all season, you could tell his heart and body wasn't up to the challenge anymore.
Chip I was less convinced about, and I will probably get smashed for saying this but how he plays frustrates the hell out of me. I think Chip he is a pure defensive player, who is slower than our current defenders. No doubt he is at AFL level and would get a game at most teams, but not sure that he fits in our new look team. With all the talk of possible trade currency he would be the one I would consider shopping around, I think he would have a fair amount of value on the market and our youngsters have him covered.
On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app
I like his versatility
Possibly, which is why you would only trade Chip to improve our position. If he could help us get a younger and more versatile defender we should consider it.A fit Chip plays vs GWS and Geelong and we go a step closer to winning both those games. The youth have been great, sometimes you need the right man for the job.
Don't all break your arms patting yourselves on the back...
Clarkson should be thanking his lucky stars that injury forced him to replan his approach to this season. If only he had been smart enough to listen to the doomsdayers here ten it would have been cherry ripe in round 3 and we would be top of the ladder.
Clarkson is such an idiot. All this stress and work on his part when the answer was so obvious.
Chip is in his prime, why would you get rid of him, on the chance of something better?Possibly, which is why you would only trade Chip to improve our position. If he could help us get a younger and more versatile defender we should consider it.
On SM-G900I using BigFooty.com mobile app
He is 29 this year, if he could help us facilitate a trade for someone like Lever we should be all in. But if we can't lock in a proven young gun agree we should keep him.C
Chip is in his prime, why would you get rid of him, on the chance of something better?
I agree his disposale is awkward and he not an attacking weapon but you do need to be able to shut down big fast forwards. Watch his job in the 2015 GF to remind yourself of his worth. Kennedy had been awsome all season and was Frawley's bitch that afternoon.
Every player cannot be perfect but a mix of the right players can make a near perfect team, that is the Hawthorn way.
I think we do. We do not have a lot of picks and I would like an another young insider and maybe an outside runner.Why do we need something to trade?
Yawn
There is no point in having players on decent money playing for Box Hill... I think you are missing something
I think we do. We do not have a lot of picks and I would like an another young insider and maybe an outside runner.
But that's my view.
Not just picks - playersI'd hate to see us put a senior player up for trade simply to trade back into the first or early second round. It's a strategy most clubs will see coming.
I actually don't mind his as an idea!Looking forward to watching the replay today. Chip to full forward, pre-season with the forwards, Rough to CHF - Schoey depth. Chip has played there before and can mark a footy. Will be a good stop gap till Lynch arrives end of 2018.
Are you working on the presumption that the side you watched last night is our best 22? And anyone sitting outside that "on decent money" is now surplus to requirements?
Please tell me how you see this working out.
I'd hate to see us put a senior player up for trade simply to trade back into the first or early second round. It's a strategy most clubs will see coming.
They are backing him to work through his set shot issues.Unfortunately you're right. I can't understand why no teammate calls for a handball.
I agree with this. For me - like I posted earlier, it's about a trade to a team that is seriously contending and need that extra piece. Player is happy and destination team pays up big due to the need. Similar to when we got Lake. Anyway, it doesn't seem to be an overly popular view around here but I wouldn't even be slightly surprised if it happensAlso if you court a player then move them on quickly, it puts a huge dent in destination club credentials. They have to think it's their idea.
Not just picks - players
But I think it is not a time to get overly conservative basically. Not suggesting wholesale player auctions - maybe something in the middle
Depth for mids is ok? Really? Love Dan Howe and Mitchell but where is the depth beyond that? Langers, Shiels...all played last night.Too right, injury to big boy and TV is essential. There's some depth players doing well in roles in the treat at the moment, they're a few years off retirement so unless someone is paying overs, more value contracted at the club
Young talls comprising ceglar obrien gunston Sicily brand (who showed his speed last night) is very flexible
I see we don't have a problem with big midfielders either any more
Yep sure. I am more in favour of trading players in. DefinitelyThere may be players looking to leave and there is the opportunity I'd say, but we'll have cap space this off season along with most other teams.
We made a decision to trade out of the first round this year to get JOM. Shouldn't change direction now.