Ah yes those horses.There'd be a horses for courses edge to selection too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Ah yes those horses.There'd be a horses for courses edge to selection too
If Langers can play the last 4 games he has last year's efforts in the bank to draw upon, Jed does not.I'd put Langers in the same category as Jed right now. Very little time to get back in before the finals. But I'd love it if he did.
Not an away gameAh yes those horses.
My bad. I will now go and ride into the sunset.Not an away game
People are thinking they didn't want Duryea as sub two weeks in a row and wanted him to play a full game. I would have thought he was ahead of Suckling though, considering he was picked last week and Suckling was a late in.Surprised Howe was picked, as is everyone. I think he will be a great player for us, but would have thought Jed was above him.
Certainly Duryea.
People are thinking they didn't want Duryea as sub two weeks in a row and wanted him to play a full game. I would have thought he was ahead of Suckling though, considering he was picked last week and Suckling was a late in.
A good assessment Bikefreak.Not necessarily.....Schoey has been playing in a totally different role/position compared to Spanger. I might also add....and not too badly either.
My tip would be that they will be named or not named based on the role required of them, not because one is better than the other in a direct comparison.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Right on!If Langers can play the last 4 games he has last year's efforts in the bank to draw upon, Jed does not.
If you thought that Scoenmakers was one of the best players on the ground last week and that he is a better player than spangher , then you should go and watch soccer because you dont know AFL.You've got no idea
The thing is anyone who gets dropped from Hawthorn is stiff when you think about it, we're not exactly struggling for good players.
That's what I think also based on how we played Geelong in the last few wins using a smaller forwardlineThere'd be a horses for courses edge to selection too
Suckling and Doc play different roles, if you want to add run and attack Suckling is still ahead of Doc currently and run and smaller forwardline seems to be the go this weekPeople are thinking they didn't want Duryea as sub two weeks in a row and wanted him to play a full game. I would have thought he was ahead of Suckling though, considering he was picked last week and Suckling was a late in.
One of the coaches thought Shoe was in the best 5 players on the ground last week based on his impact on the outcome, I know Clarko watches soccer so maybe it was him..If you thought that Scoenmakers was one of the best players on the ground last week and that he is a better player than spangher , then you should go and watch soccer because you dont know AFL.
NoHere's a crazy thought and I don't for a minute believe Clarko would stoop to such tactics...
maybe Howe will be given licence/instructions to smash the likes of Selwood / Motlop / johnson / Murdoch...
a sacrificial MRP lamb as it were?
Here's a crazy thought and I don't for a minute believe Clarko would stoop to such tactics...
maybe Howe will be given licence/instructions to smash the likes of Selwood / Motlop / johnson / Murdoch...
a sacrificial MRP lamb as it were?
I was at the game last weekend and Shoey provided plenty of decoy runs, great kicking and when it was his time to go, his tackles viewed live and up close were crunching. He goes okay - don't you worry about that.If you thought that Scoenmakers was one of the best players on the ground last week and that he is a better player than spangher , then you should go and watch soccer because you dont know AFL.
l don't know if l am missing an in joke or not but why are posters saying Shoey got votes in the coaches award? He didn't- Luke Shoey got the 2 votesTell that to Clarko/Simpson you fool
Ha h, right you are. Doesn't change the fact he's best 22 this year (up forward)l don't know if l am missing an in joke or not but why are posters saying Shoey got votes in the coaches award? He didn't- Luke Shoey got the 2 votes
When the votes were first published on the AFL site they had 2 votes to Shoe not to Shuey, Hawks site has Shuey in the votes but I hadn't read them since they were first postedl don't know if l am missing an in joke or not but why are posters saying Shoey got votes in the coaches award? He didn't- Luke Shoey got the 2 votes
Ha.. I'm not the only one thinking it was "Shoey" Shoenmakers. I wonder how we got that wrong in our heads.l don't know if l am missing an in joke or not but why are posters saying Shoey got votes in the coaches award? He didn't- Luke Shoey got the 2 votes
Agree 100% In Clarko we trust.Schoey and Doc both named for BHH. So not rested it seems. Sure there is a good reason behind all of it - Clarko and the selection committee have to have a couple of runs on the board now surely.
Langford has been picked for BHH also - would be fantastic if he could find some form.