Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Geelong kicked themselves out of that Grand Final. It's sad when it is so clear who has the better team, only failing when it comes to slotting goals from 10m out with no pressure. Geelong were clearly dominating that game, it all came down to OUR inability to kick straight, not Hawthorns ability to outplay us. The majority of teams would have beaten us that day, we simply could not kick straight. We had no problem getting the ball (inside 50's will clearly show that).
So let me get this straight - you think a team that had won all but one game all year and had won their previous Grand Final by 119 points was under more situation pressure than your mob? Or that you were immune to it somehow but we weren't? Or are you trying to prove the point that Hawthorn had nothing to do with the pressure put on our boys?
How do you not understand that you are proving my point? Exactly, 99 out of 100 times we'd have played better, even 99 out of 100 Grand Finals with that specific team, but we didn't, we had an off day. Sure the pressure of the day played a factor (I said that before but it was countered by another Hawthorn fan who felt all the pressure was from Hawthorn and the 'situation pressure' means nothing).Oh, FFS. I'm hoping you're just taking the piss now, you don't across as the brightest spark, but it seems so far-fetched that you could genuinely miss the point so badly.
No, we weren't "immune to it somehow", we just handled it better on the day. Things like Ottens' miss, Mooney's misses, Harry Taylor's fumble, 99.99 times out of 100 these events wouldn't have happened, but it was a Grand Final, that's what makes this particular game so different from the 25 other rounds throughout the year.
At any rate, we're going around in circles. To keep my faith in humanity, I'm going to tell myself that you actually do understand this, and are just being argumentative for the f of it.
The last time you made a decent troll was during the last global financial crisis. Time to retire buddy.After looking at today's paper and noticing Geelong are geelongcats.com.au and not the gfc.com.au anymore, who is insecure?
GFC is Global Financial Collapse. GFC is also Geelong Failures Collapsed. It can stand for Geelong F***ing Choked.
We had an off day with our kicking, our coach threw as many changes as a potato would've and you guys pounced on our dissatisfaction with our first half and thrived off it, lifting. We had no answer unfortunately, but that doesn't mean we are not a better team - we most certainly were a better team in 2008, although we lost the premiership, but that's life, and that's football - the best team doesn't always win. You guys outplayed us over the 4 quarters, full credit to you, but we had the opportunity to take the game and win it in that first half and nothing you say can change that."the pressure of the day played a factor (I said that before but it was countered by another Hawthorn fan who felt all the pressure was from Hawthorn and the 'situation pressure' means nothing)."
How could you argue against that idea, and maintain that "99 out of 100 times we'd have played better, even 99 out of 100 Grand Finals with that specific team"?
The "situation pressure" is not a variable, and if you sight that as a mitigating circumstance you are admitting your team significally weaker than Hawthorn, mentally (and yes, that does go a long way towards suggesting Hawthorn are a better team).
Hawthorn, after all, were subject to at least as much, if not more "situational pressure".
We had an off day with our kicking, our coach threw as many changes as a potato would've and you guys pounced on our dissatisfaction with our first half and thrived off it, lifting. We had no answer unfortunately, but that doesn't mean we are not a better team - we most certainly were a better team in 2008, although we lost the premiership, but that's life, and that's football - the best team doesn't always win. You guys outplayed us over the 4 quarters, full credit to you, but we had the opportunity to take the game and win it in that first half and nothing you say can change that.
If we had switched on in that 2nd quarter like we know we can and converted those goals we missed under no pressure, we would have rolled on and won ourselves a flag. We shot ourselves in the foot, simple as that.
The last time you made a decent troll was during the last global financial crisis. Time to retire buddy.
Geelong did not lose the GF because they missed some goals in the second quarter and early in the third. The reality is Hawthorn broke even in the first, lost possesion in the second, smashed Geelong in the third and completely dominated the last.
You didn't answer my question. Why is Geelong so insecure that they had to change their domain name and what they are called?
Before the come back of 'Tassie Hawks', we made money out of that.
We had an off day with our kicking, our coach threw as many changes as a potato would've and you guys pounced on our dissatisfaction with our first half and thrived off it, lifting. We had no answer unfortunately, but that doesn't mean we are not a better team - we most certainly were a better team in 2008, although we lost the premiership, but that's life, and that's football - the best team doesn't always win. You guys outplayed us over the 4 quarters, full credit to you, but we had the opportunity to take the game and win it in that first half and nothing you say can change that.
If we had switched on in that 2nd quarter like we know we can and converted those goals we missed under no pressure, we would have rolled on and won ourselves a flag. We shot ourselves in the foot, simple as that.
You guys outplayed us over the 4 quarters, full credit to you, but we had the opportunity to take the game and win it in that first half and nothing you say can change that.
It's a marketing ploy, our CEO thinks it will make us money. How is that insecure?You didn't answer my question. Why is Geelong so insecure that they had to change their domain name and what they are called?
Before the come back of 'Tassie Hawks', we made money out of that.
It's a marketing ploy, our CEO thinks it will make us money. How is that insecure?
Where does fair and square come from? I never said you weren't the better team on the day, on the contrary I've admitted it several times. What I do know is that your burst in the second half came at a time where our confidence was down. We absolutely smashed you in the second quarter out of the centre, our midfield was dominating but we couldn't put it on the scoreboard.As painful as it would be ( and christ knows I couldnt do it ) Geelong supporters would be well served to take another in depth look at the GF. 99.9% of Cat fans have no more memory of the game than the emotional shock of the loss, and as often happens when there is a refusal to believe you have lost, the easiest and most basic reasoning emerges. Geelong did not lose the GF because they missed some goals in the second quarter and early in the third. The reality is Hawthorn broke even in the first, lost possesion in the second, smashed Geelong in the third and completely dominated the last. They were two key players down for the majority of the match and yet had more run, poise and composure when the game was there to be won. Grand Finals are won the by team with a greater spread of contributers throughout the game, the team with the higher level of desperation. The team that is disciplined enough to stick to their plan and structures when the white hot heat that only a GF will provide, is on. By any reasoning that team was Hawthorn, clearly. Geelong fans (and apparently their coach ) who want to put down the comfortable defeat to some poor kicking are deluding themselves and being highly disrespectful to an opponent that won the game fair and square.
Don't want to tell you or Bomber or the boys how to suck eggs but it would probably be a good idea to switch on for the whole game next time you play in a Grand Final.
As a supporter base they've pretty much disgraced themselves and their club on this site. Winners are grinners but they've hit new lows I don't think Bigfooty will rise from.
...Anyone who doesn't think that we shot ourselves in the foot by missing 9 shots in that quarter is being ridiculously stupid or ignorant. You can't spin 1.9 as not being our own fault...
How do you not understand that you are proving my point? Exactly, 99 out of 100 times we'd have played better, even 99 out of 100 Grand Finals with that specific team, but we didn't, we had an off day. Sure the pressure of the day played a factor (I said that before but it was countered by another Hawthorn fan who felt all the pressure was from Hawthorn and the 'situation pressure' means nothing).
The fact is, handling the pressure better doesn't make you a better team - if we played that Grand Final again I have no doubt we'd absolutely thrash you guys. I hope we are given the chance again on the last saturday of September this year - bring it on!
We had an off day with our kicking, our coach threw as many changes as a potato would've and you guys pounced on our dissatisfaction with our first half and thrived off it, lifting. We had no answer unfortunately, but that doesn't mean we are not a better team - we most certainly were a better team in 2008, although we lost the premiership, but that's life, and that's football - the best team doesn't always win. You guys outplayed us over the 4 quarters, full credit to you, but we had the opportunity to take the game and win it in that first half and nothing you say can change that.
If we had switched on in that 2nd quarter like we know we can and converted those goals we missed under no pressure, we would have rolled on and won ourselves a flag. We shot ourselves in the foot, simple as that.