How many from your team can walk in to any best 23

The last ruckman I can think of who was also a very good forward was Salmon, also Peter Everitt in his StKilda days. Perhaps David Hale at a pinch.

The best 23 he doesn't get into... If Carlton were to pick TDK over Marshall, then he doesn't get in there IMO. The same goes with the Dogs and Tim English.


Ottens at Richmond had one season where he averaged nearly 2 goals a game and about 15 hit outs which I will assume was his AA season but he never hit those heights as a forward again.
 
The last ruckman I can think of who was also a very good forward was Salmon, also Peter Everitt in his StKilda days. Perhaps David Hale at a pinch.

The best 23 he doesn't get into... If Carlton were to pick TDK over Marshall, then he doesn't get in there IMO. The same goes with the Dogs and Tim English.
Petrie? Ottens?
 
and west coast*, I originally missed Carlton, forgot about them

But my point stands anyway, most clubs can fit any half decent player.
The bottom few players in any teams best 23 would be out in a heartbeat for at least half a dozen players from any other club.
Yeah, you might be right about West Coast - though Waterman is undersized.
 
Not in his time at Geelong. Just the size he had to put on as a ruckman - he just didn't seem to have the same mobility he used to when he played CHF.

Petrie I always though of as a CHF first, and a part-time ruckman.
Just checked his stats and I think that’s fair given he averaged like ten hitouts per game at his peak output.

It’s an interesting discussion though as I think that can be attributed to the fact that he played alongside other very strong rucks in Burton, Hale, McIntosh and Goldstein during his career. Perhaps if the Roos hadn’t had such diversity of option he’d have been used as a primary ruckman more often. I guess we’ll never know.
 
Just checked his stats and I think that’s fair given he averaged like ten hitouts per game at his peak output.

It’s an interesting discussion though as I think that can be attributed to the fact that he played alongside other very strong rucks in Burton, Hale, McIntosh and Goldstein during his career. Perhaps if the Roos hadn’t had such diversity of option he’d have been used as a primary ruckman more often. I guess we’ll never know.
Probably not IMO - he was 1.97m and rangy at a time when the best rucks were still a smidge over 2m.

Tell you what though - he would have been far better valued in this era where the 2-ruck setup is dead as the dinosaur. A guy who can play forward, back, pinch-hit in the ruck and doesn't get injured - that's like gold now.
 
Probably not IMO - he was 1.97m and rangy at a time when the best rucks were still a smidge over 2m.

Tell you what though - he would have been far better valued in this era where the 2-ruck setup is dead as the dinosaur. A guy who can play forward, back, pinch-hit in the ruck and doesn't get injured - that's like gold now.
You’ve described Darcy Moore or Oscar Allen there funnily enough (sans injury free). Neither club really utilise them that way though.
 
I'm not 100% sold that Naughton gets a gig at Adelaide in front of Tex, Thilthorpe and Fogarty.

Naughton would get a gig over Curtin, and Adelaide would likely do everything in their power to make it work.

Doesn't matter how many KPF's you have, you're not leaving a >1.5 goal per game player in the wilderness unless they were cancerous to the team.
 
I'm not 100% sold that Naughton gets a gig at Adelaide in front of Tex, Thilthorpe and Fogarty.
We would play him at CHB, where he is better suited imo.
 
Walk into any best 23? It's such a weird question. Really it's a status reserved for superstar, AA calibre players whose quality kind of transcends their week-to-week form and their own team's game style. I can tell you a few players I'd nab from other clubs: Darcy, Bont, Daicos, Pickett.
 

How many from your team can walk in to any best 23

Back
Top