Society/Culture Hypocrisy of The Left - part 3

[Barry_Badrinath]

This is Part 3 of this thread.

We roll threads over about every 10,000 posts.

Started in Part 1: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left.1079388/

Continued from Part 2: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left-part-2.1141142/

Continued in Part 4

https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/threads/hypocrisy-of-the-left-part-4.1389268/

 

[Noidenous]

Ok, for your simpleton mind, DO YOU CONDONE RACIAL / RELIGIOUS ABUSE OF THE WOMAN?

I told you, I'm not interested in your bullshit little dichotomy.

 

[Noidenous]

Do we let the militia in do we? Or refugees? Big difference.

Not when there's risk they are one and the same.

 

[Mofra]

Correcting incorrectly.

Consider yourself corrected.

You can ask the people there if they thought there was much difference (and yes, I did serve with a couple) - or don't the hard right care about the military anymore?

 

[Noidenous]

You can ask the people there if they thought there was much difference (and yes, I did serve with a couple) - or don't the hard right care about the military anymore?

You can spin the mission into an Australian war if you wish, but that doesn't make it correct.

 

[FireKrakouer]

Pretty sure some bogan abusing a young woman is cowardly and wrong. If it is a "free" country, then she should be free to wear a headscarf without harrassment. And I'm far from being an sjw type.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

The constitution does not say anything about targeting a country based on religion. It says the government must not prevent people from expressing their religion. A travel ban for security reasons does not do this. Those people can express their religion were they are so the constitution is not violated at all.

Can you please justify the reason to have a ban on people from countries whose religion is Muslim?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

I told you, I'm not interested in your bullshit little dichotomy.

Ok, so you can’t answer it? Ok so let’s flip it around ‘If an Australian born Iranian says to an English woman ‘**** off back to where you came from’ - would that be ok?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Not when there's risk they are one and the same.

Oh ok, and how do we assess the risk of letting in an Irishman who MIGHT have IRA connections?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Not when there's risk they are one and the same.

Generalisation

 

[Len Nicodemo]

We need to be honest about why men earn more than woman and not be afraid of PC nonsense.

I just drove past a construction site with the Men breaking their backs doing heavy lifting while the 2 woman were standing their holding lollypop signs.

Lets stop this PC rubbish an just be honest and if peoples feeling get hurt too bad.

My wife earns more than me and probably is in the 10% of highest paid people in this country. She also isn’t great at handling the kids day in day out because she prefers to be at work. What should we do? Tell her stay home while I work and when I come home expect a pie cooking on the window ledge? Sorry, what am I being honest about? I also had a plumber come out the other day that was a woman and I haven’t had a hassle since.

Oh yep, but in the name of political correctness we need to honest about gender stereotyping because it’s a blanket ideology that suits people that struggle to think laterally?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

We need to be honest about why men earn more than woman and not be afraid of PC nonsense.

I just drove past a construction site with the Men breaking their backs doing heavy lifting while the 2 woman were standing their holding lollypop signs.

Lets stop this PC rubbish an just be honest and if peoples feeling get hurt too bad.

Oh and also, I’ve NEVER seen a man turning signs....

 

[Len Nicodemo]

I paid to go and watch his show in Melbourne and I am the most intelligent poster on Bigfooty .

Course you did. And no you’re not.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Money is not the same as food, food can only be eaten once while money can be recirculated.

If you wont a good amount of money to go around for the working and middle class than you need rich people to invest and stimulate the economy.

Its not a hard concept mate, middle class and working class people are limited in their ability to provide the investment we need. Rich people are the ones who are usually the ones best able to provide the capital investments that make all our life's much better.

So the more money rich people have the more they will invest which means more money for everyone else.

You’re generalising by assuming rich people will reinvest. I am rich and I won’t reinvest because I want the money to go to my kids. I’ve also got no issues paying 48 cents of my dollar to go to proper policy solutions such as healthcare, education, infrastructure, public transport and climate control.

I’ve got what I need. There’s only so much you need.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

PC is just code for anti white male.
Anyone who cant see it all heads in one direction is obviously part of the toxic narrative..

Its just a way to control and dictate to men while women are free to say, write and do whatever they want

Ha! And men aren’t free to say what they want? Even though men did it for decades and decades and all of a sudden female activists got the guts to stand up and call it out? All of a sudden men’s sexist behaviour is stymied and they don’t have a voice?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

well done on proving my point...The perpetual lie that men are the privileged gender and women are oppressed..too bad all parts of society favour women extensively..health, education, welfare, laws, court, children, housing, tax

such a shame facts destroy you're bigoted propaganda..quick come up with another insult
try missoggyknee

How does society favour women? Health? Fine for me, can’t say I’ve been treated poorly by the health system. Pay my private health and it gives me the same privelages as my wife who pays the same. Education? Went to school and went to uni. No issues because I was a guy. Welfare? What, there’s no men on welfare? Laws & Courts? How exactly? Children? No issues there, I’ve got mates that are divorced and see their kids every second weekend. Housing? I live in a house. Tax? I pay income tax on my pay bracket, so does my wife. She actually pays more tax.

Got anything else?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

I don't know how to change my signature. I made the signature i have over an article a few years ago that got me angry.

But i am a very humble poster so it would not suit me.

Even though by your own admission you’re the most intelligent poster on BF?

 

[La Dolce Vita]

Ha! And men aren’t free to say what they want? Even though men did it for decades and decades and all of a sudden female activists got the guts to stand up and call it out? All of a sudden men’s sexist behaviour is stymied and they don’t have a voice?

perfect example of someone who's opinion is spoon fed from the media and not reality

Men can say and write what they want. Im not sure if its more hilarious or embarrassing that you actually believe this

 

[Len Nicodemo]

perfect example of someone who's opinion is spoon fed from the media and not reality

Men can say and write what they want. Im not sure if its more hilarious or embarrassing that you actually believe this

Hmmm, let’s see, can you prove me wrong? How many articles are circulated today from male journalists? Sorry it’s not ok to make sexist and bigoted remarks. Is that what you mean? Men are repressed because it’s not ok to be sexist and bigoted?

 

[La Dolce Vita]

How does society favour women? Health? Fine for me, can’t say I’ve been treated poorly by the health system. Pay my private health and it gives me the same privelages as my wife who pays the same. Education? Went to school and went to uni. No issues because I was a guy. Welfare? What, there’s no men on welfare? Laws & Courts? How exactly? Children? No issues there, I’ve got mates that are divorced and see their kids every second weekend. Housing? I live in a house. Tax? I pay income tax on my pay bracket, so does my wife. She actually pays more tax.

Got anything else?

Ill dumb it down for you as much as possible

Men pay the majority of tax fact..More tax dollars are spent on women across the board. As I said health education welfare etc etc etc.. If this is not privilege, what is ?

well done on using your own experience as proof of your ignorant argument..Talk about straw man

 

[La Dolce Vita]

Hmmm, let’s see, can you prove me wrong? How many articles are circulated today from male journalists? Sorry it’s not ok to make sexist and bigoted remarks. Is that what you mean? Men are repressed because it’s not ok to be sexist and bigoted?

lol check all the major media outlets..endless male bashing and female centered articles written by men and women..Then try and find the opposite..Ill give you a whole year to find 1

 

[Royal Flush]

Ill dumb it down for you as much as possible

Men pay the majority of tax fact..More tax dollars are spent on women across the board. As I said health education welfare etc etc etc.. If this is not privilege, what is ?

well done on using your own experience as proof of your ignorant argument..Talk about straw man

You should probably elobarate further when you mention how the tax system benefits women and bias men.

Here's my understanding of the inequality

When couples divorce, generally the woman becomes the primary career. Not always the case with 50/50 splits and both parents working or not working.
In the case where the man was working and the womans work was managing the house and maybe limited hours of paid employment, the man has no choice but to continue his full-time employment to recoup the loss of majority assets and the matrimonial home. His option for a 50/50 shared care arrangement is not a viable one, offcourse depending on the age of their children.
He has no choice.
So the man not only works to maintain a standard of living by starting over again, usually involves a new place furniture, perhaps the car ect. but he also pays in addition to taxes , child support. Not to mention the high cost of wasted money to the legal fraternity in the family courts. Even if the man has the ability to fund a trial, the woman can circumvent the system with numerous tools dragging out the case longer then it needs to be and eventually wasting lots of money if he has it or falling short at the last minute due an inability to continue funding himself. He then has no choice , no freedom to resolve his family dispute issue.
Strategically the family court system benefits the woman.
The woman can be represented by legal aid funding . The means testing for legal is obscured in the case of a woman. This is technically institutional inequality. Government funded lawyers vs funded lawyer's
Then...
The woman has a choice, to work or not work as her basic expenses for staying at home if she chooses to not work are supplemented by family tax benefit A, B and centre link income.
In addition child support suppliment.
Relevant to the man's earning capacity she maybe getting a pretty healthy child support payment.
No need to work for an entire generation.
Funded by the government and the father of the children


Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Ill dumb it down for you as much as possible

Men pay the majority of tax fact..More tax dollars are spent on women across the board. As I said health education welfare etc etc etc.. If this is not privilege, what is ?

well done on using your own experience as proof of your ignorant argument..Talk about straw man

Men probably pay more tax because there are more men working you simpleton

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Ill dumb it down for you as much as possible

Men pay the majority of tax fact..More tax dollars are spent on women across the board. As I said health education welfare etc etc etc.. If this is not privilege, what is ?

well done on using your own experience as proof of your ignorant argument..Talk about straw man

So a woman earning 100k gets taxed more than a man earning 100k? Is that how it works?

 

[Len Nicodemo]

No, I can't show you a quote where she says she is literally silenced.
She dresses herself up like some kind of martyr, she just spews hate and gets paid for it.
She has no conviction, she just repeats the same rubbish over and over.

It’s ok though, because the RW posters have got behind a black woman as their source for justifying an anti Islamic sentiment. It’s ok because she black. They aren’t racist or bigoted.

 

[Len Nicodemo]

Islam itself as a religion is “problematic’’.....there is no arguing about that. Whereas there are Muslim’s who live peacefully, and those that don’t. Same as there are Christians that are toxic, and those that aren’t.

Isn’t that Ayaan’s basic argument? Fairly common sense I would of thought.

Regardless, for mine, Islam itself as a religion is a blot and a cancer, and comes with issues no other religion brings with it, and it is completely incompatible with secular, Western democratic society, and until there is root and branch reformation of the religion itself, there will ALWAYS be maniacs out there wanting to blow up little girls attending pop concerts in its name.

When a Christian does the same, I’ll say the same thing about them.

What do you think of Catholicism? I’d argue pretty convincingly that Catholicism comes with its own set of unique problems, probably most recognisable with Cardinal Pell being convicted of sexual abuse. Catholicism is a blot and stain on society. Sure they aren’t blowing people up, but they’re sexually abusing kids and have been getting away with it for years.

Just so you’re aware, in this country there are more accounts of sexual abuse against kids from the CC than there has been people murdered by Muslims.