News Insightful and Inciteful - 2022 Media Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's all very confusing. My daughter played netball on Saturday with a girl who subseuqently tested positive. It was a 45 minute game and they were not face to face, so that wouldn't qualify as a close contact I don't think. I mean, they were passing around a sweaty ball, but under the rules I don't think my daughter has to isolate.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

It's all very confusing. My daughter played netball on Saturday with a girl who subseuqently tested positive. It was a 45 minute game and they were not face to face, so that wouldn't qualify as a close contact I don't think. I mean, they were passing around a sweaty ball, but under the rules I don't think my daughter has to isolate.

Indoor or outdoor court?
 
It's all very confusing. My daughter played netball on Saturday with a girl who subseuqently tested positive. It was a 45 minute game and they were not face to face, so that wouldn't qualify as a close contact I don't think. I mean, they were passing around a sweaty ball, but under the rules I don't think my daughter has to isolate.
Yeh doesnt need to isolate.

My daughter was deemed a close contact at daycare a few weeks ago. We didnt have to isolate and my daughter was allowed to attend daycare.

Somehow she and we dodged a bullet, for now.
 

You are a close contact if you had the following contact with a person who has tested positive for COVID-19 during their infectious period:

  • You are a household member and/or intimate partner of the COVID-19 case.
  • You have had 15 minutes of face-to-face contact with the case where both of you were not wearing masks.
  • You have spent more than 2 hours in a small room (around the size of a classroom) with the case, where both of you were not wearing masks.
Surely the team goes into iso if there’s a positive player involved in a match
 

You are a close contact if you had the following contact with a person who has tested positive for COVID-19 during their infectious period:

  • You are a household member and/or intimate partner of the COVID-19 case.
  • You have had 15 minutes of face-to-face contact with the case where both of you were not wearing masks.
  • You have spent more than 2 hours in a small room (around the size of a classroom) with the case, where both of you were not wearing masks.
Surely the team goes into iso if there’s a positive player involved in a match
I wouldn't think so. 15 minutes face to face is basically sitting down and having a conversation with someone for 15 minutes straight.
 

You are a close contact if you had the following contact with a person who has tested positive for COVID-19 during their infectious period:

  • You are a household member and/or intimate partner of the COVID-19 case.
  • You have had 15 minutes of face-to-face contact with the case where both of you were not wearing masks.
  • You have spent more than 2 hours in a small room (around the size of a classroom) with the case, where both of you were not wearing masks.
Surely the team goes into iso if there’s a positive player involved in a match

i don't think playing AFL is considered face-to-face given you're constantly running on and off people.
Silly? Maybe. but the rules aren't trying to get to zero covid.
 
i don't think playing AFL is considered face-to-face given you're constantly running on and off people.
Silly? Maybe. but the rules aren't trying to get to zero covid.
Guaranteed they’d be forced into isolation if a Covid positive player was involved in a match. Everyone in the coaches box would be too if Simpson was positive such as Voss in R1.

The rules can be a bit rubbery for the average family out in the community with so much of it around at the moment, but no way a high profile case like a positive player on field during an Eagles footy game slips through to the keeper
 
Even if you play basketball against a positive case, you are not a close contact and do not need to isolate. According to feedback from the Government.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Guaranteed they’d be forced into isolation if a Covid positive player was involved in a match. Everyone in the coaches box would be too if Simpson was positive such as Voss in R1.
Correctly so. More than 2 hours in a small room / 15 min face to face - take your pick.
Even if you play basketball against a positive case, you are not a close contact and do not need to isolate. According to feedback from the Government.
Correct. Happened to my son's team. One player tested positive, no isolation required.

The rules can be a bit rubbery for the average family out in the community with so much of it around at the moment, but no way a high profile case like a positive player on field during an Eagles footy game slips through to the keeper
Absolutely it would.

I'm not sure why we are trying to invent problems that don't exist.
 
i don't think playing AFL is considered face-to-face given you're constantly running on and off people.
Silly? Maybe. but the rules aren't trying to get to zero covid.
It is def not face to face. Hockey seaso starts this weekend and I'm not going to be a close contact if someone on the field test positive. AFL would be the same.

I assume that pretty much all of our isolations have been from:
1. Household contact- kids got COVID, infected a parent and the other isolates. With Ryan and Kelly, it is likely they then contracted COVID after a few days of being a contact
2. Actually getting COVID (it's likely nearly all the guys without kids are in this boat unless they share with someone

Given the vagueness of those rules, the club can organise things so that players shouldn't have to isolate unless they are a household contact. If they are, then it's likely they will catch it anyway.
 
Correctly so. More than 2 hours in a small room / 15 min face to face - take your pick.

Correct. Happened to my son's team. One player tested positive, no isolation required.


Absolutely it would.

I'm not sure why we are trying to invent problems that don't exist.
This is wrong. If one player forced the whole team into iso, them why didn't all of Carlton's team isolate? We knew about Barrass and Edwards within 48 hrs of our rnd 1 game - why didn't both teams isolate then?

The coaches fall into the 2hrs in an enclosed space (the box), so that makes sense.
 
Some reasonable comments about Sundays farce in the article from Voss and Hardwick.


Hardwick looking into how Richmond could lend us players if required.

Mrs Hardwick wouldn’t agree but he’s a decent bloke isn’t he? 😅
 
As I've mentioned before it is an obvious disadvantage to have to play off-listers but should one of them be okay then 'their' team (e.g. WCE) should get first dibs as some form of compensation.

And what if some unscrupulous coach chose a lot of solidly built off listers and told them "Be physical, really physical, do you understand what I'm saying? REALLY REALLY physical." And so the tribunal scrubs a whole lot of off listers but the team wins. Of course coaches would never bend the rules ...

Plus, I'd like a journo to directly ask Gil 'So if what happened to the Eagles (or worse) happens to one of the teams in the GF it's still game on?'
 
And what if some unscrupulous coach chose a lot of solidly built off listers and told them "Be physical, really physical, do you understand what I'm saying? REALLY REALLY physical." And so the tribunal scrubs a whole lot of off listers but the team wins. Of course coaches would never bend the rules ...

Suspensions apply to the lower leagues too. Why would the Aaron Blacks of the world risk a lengthy suspension that would prevent them from going back and playing for West Perth?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top