Opinion International Geopolitics

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

You are supposed pick a running mate that isn't going to outshine you at speeches on the campaign trail.

Haven't seen Gov Tim Walz's speech at the Democrats convention, just heard that he gave a good speech, but saw this the other day and thought, this is better than anything I have seen Kamala say in the last few weeks.

Most of her speeches I have seen are clips of bouncy pump ups, laughing and music. Will have to watch both her's and Walz's stump speech at the convention to see if it stays the same.



 
RussellEbertHandball said:
You are supposed pick a running mate that isn't going to outshine you at speeches on the campaign trail.

Haven't seen Gov Tim Walz's speech at the Democrats convention, just heard that he gave a good speech, but saw this the other day and thought, this is better than anything I have seen Kamala say in the last few weeks.

Most of her speeches I have seen are clips of bouncy pump ups, laughing and music. Will have to watch both her's and Walz's stump speech at the convention to see if it stays the same.



Click to expand...

My opinion.
Her convention speech was next level. I watched the whole thing.
She hit the exact right notes. I was surprised at how good it was.
It actually had substance too.
Now the US need to get out and actually vote..
She came across as compassionate, experienced and strong and motivating.
They need a compassionate leader.
They both bring different things but look like a perfect team.
Trump is flailing and cruel.
Vance has zero charisma or relatability and also comes across as cruel and disingenuous, so a good match.
Of course he will never outshine Trump, just how Trump likes it.
 
OneGreatClub said:
FFS NATO, help them properly!
Allow them to fight back without one hand tied behind their back.
Russia is using weapons from Iran, from North Korea to destroy Ukraine.
Allow Ukraine to do the same to Russia with weapons from the West.

Click to expand...

The U.S. had previously declared that their weapons should not be deployed against targets inside of Russia because of fear of an escalation. That ban was lifted with Ukraine being allowed to hit targets inside Russia “near Kharkiv”.

What’s the difference between hitting military targets in Russia “near Kharkiv” and hitting any other military targets in Russia?
What’s the difference between a military strike being carried out by Ukraine 30km in Russia and one carried out 130km in Russia?
There is none.

Ukraine should be allowed to go after other legitimate military targets deeper inside Russia. The precedent has been set. Another line has been crossed and Putin’s bluff has been called again.
 
wannabejack said:
The U.S. had previously declared that their weapons should not be deployed against targets inside of Russia because of fear of an escalation. That ban was lifted with Ukraine being allowed to hit targets inside Russia “near Kharkiv”.

What’s the difference between hitting military targets in Russia “near Kharkiv” and hitting any other military targets in Russia?
What’s the difference between a military strike being carried out by Ukraine 30km in Russia and one carried out 130km in Russia?
There is none.

Ukraine should be allowed to go after other legitimate military targets deeper inside Russia. The precedent has been set. Another line has been crossed and Putin’s bluff has been called again.
Click to expand...
Absolutely
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)



The specific question is from about 1 minute in. A frighteningly hilarious response by Trump, followed by the obligatory Make America Great Again with applause

It is the political equivalent of the "San Dimas High School Football Rules" scene from Bill & Ted.
 
PortWTF said:


The specific question is from about 1 minute in. A frighteningly hilarious response by Trump, followed by the obligatory Make America Great Again with applause

It is the political equivalent of the "San Dimas High School Football Rules" scene from Bill & Ted.
Click to expand...


Wasn't he just saying that the cost of childcare (as a govt policy) is small in terms of the anticipated revenue from policies like taxing imports so that they will be able to fix it?

I mean yeah, he's a clumsy speaker and rambles, but I don't see what is so outrageous about that clip.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion International Geopolitics

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top