Crowked said:Surely if this was the case, half the Victorian clubs would be extinct. When was the last time the AFL didnt give an end of season handout to a Victorian club to avaiod them going bankrupt. The only thing that changes is which club it is.
The truth behind the issue is there should never have been so many Victorian clubs in a national football competition. 10 teams from one state in a national comp of any sport in this country is a gross over representation of that states contribution to the sport. In this case its a gross over representation of Victoria at the expense of other established and more profitable possiblities in both SA and WA, which as proportion of input to australian rules is equally under represented.
I'm not saying the SANFL or the WAFL were the equal of the VFL in the old days, the VFL was always IMO the strongest comp in the land. However the St.Kildas, Fitzroys and Footscrays of the old VFL would have been making up the numbers in our comps too. Now they are members of a national comp, while other much more successful and profitable clubs in SA and WA have been decimated in every way by their exclusion from a competion they deserved to be part of much more than some existing members.
Still smarting over Centrals not getting that second liscense, aren't you.