- Banned
- #26
Certain to get injured and miss weeks of footy and Collingwood will then have nothing but a Cloke to go too.
Should have kept Jack Anthony..
I didn't know we picked the weapon as well during the trade period
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Certain to get injured and miss weeks of footy and Collingwood will then have nothing but a Cloke to go too.
Should have kept Jack Anthony..
Puzzled? Think Leigh Brown.
Dawes is not a Leigh Brown type, Lynch is ... Bucks is trying to revisit 2010 & replace both Davis & Brown.
As a forward - no
As a back up Ruck - yes
Now that the AFL has changed the ruck rules allowing tall skinny players to have an impact, does this make Ceglar and Witts more viable, and Q less important?
It may be a bit early, but apparently Witts goes alright, + another preseason, Pie supporters would be able to answer that more accurately.Can those two actually provide a presence up forward? Because Lynch offers a big body up forward.
It may be a bit early, but apparently Witts goes alright, + another preseason, Pie supporters would be able to answer that more accurately.
Well obviously Melbourne rate him very highly.... Something appears off.
Lynch has a season left in him and is barely an upgrade.
I don't think the whole story has come out which is a credit to Collingwood and Dawes.
As a forward - no
As a back up Ruck - yes
Now that the AFL has changed the ruck rules allowing tall skinny players to have an impact, does this make Ceglar and Witts more viable, and Q less important?
Q may turn out to have the added bonus of giving them time to develop. Then again, it's probably why he was brought in.I watched a fair bit of them in the VFL this season and, while they will both be big imposing units, they're not quite ready to act as a target up forward at AFL level.
he's missed 15 games in 9 years, 8 of those in 2010.Certain to get injured and miss weeks of footy and Collingwood will then have nothing but a Cloke to go too.
Should have kept Jack Anthony..
What am I missing here?
As a forward - no
As a back up Ruck - yes
Now that the AFL has changed the ruck rules allowing tall skinny players to have an impact, does this make Ceglar and Witts more viable, and Q less important?