To a large extent the AFC has it's hands tied behind it's back, being limited by what the SANFL will and won't allow them to do.So if Trigg was doing such a great job why has the club gone from the juggernaunt of the AFL to making losses ? Why have our Victorian counterparts gone from financial basketcases to financial powerhouses while our club has financially gone backwards ? Why has the club still not established a source of off-field revenue despite it being blatantly obvious a decade ago that the club need to go down that path ? Why was the Westpac Centre built when there was so much conjecture over the future of Football Park ? Then you had the "non-inclusive" shed membership debarcle which directly went against the matra of the club. Not to mention labelling supporters as pathetic for voicing their opinions of a coach who had clearly gone past his expiry date. Matt Rendell was another blunder especially when the term "brand" was used to justify the decision especially when the Tippett saga has been about 10 times more damaging for our brand than that ever was.
Exemplary? I dont think so..... An interim CEO who has been exposed as being out of his depth is more appropriate I think.
The worst example of where the SANFL are holding the AFC back is the stadium deal. The AFL went to a great deal of expense and trouble to ensure that the Victorian teams were all given stadium deals from which they were/are able to make sustainable money. Adelaide are still stuck with the original stadium deal, whereby the SANFL scoop up almost all the game day profits, leaving the AFC with just the crumbs. Adelaide & Port Adelaide have the two worst stadium deals in the entire competition - and there's not a damn thing that the CEO of either club can do, because the SANFL owns Football Park and the AFL licenses as well.
Then there's the issue of off-site revenue. As far as I'm aware, the SANFL won't allow the AFC to have a pokies license - without which there's not a whole lot of point in buying and/or owning a pub.
The Westpac Centre will serve the club well for many years to come. There is no requirement for the training facility to be co-located with the home ground - heck, Melbourne and Geelong are probably the only two clubs with this luxury - and one of those is a basket case.
I must agree that I wasn't happy with the decision they made regarding Shed access. That said, the decision was turned around fairly quickly (as soon as they realised that nobody was turning up because of the elitist policy which the AFC had implemented).
Rendell was fired because he'd become an embarrassment to the club. He'd been given plenty of warnings, but the big guy just couldn't keep his mouth shut. Once he started making racist comments it was all over red rover. This was Rendell's fault, not Trigg's.