two 2nd rounders
Trade Requested Ivan Soldo - Requested a trade to Victoria, linked to St Kilda
- Thread starter Young Gun #6
- Start date
- Tagged users None
two 2nd rounders
Zero chance in this draft you would suggest.
So Melbourne got pick 46 in 2023 and pick 40 in 2024 for Grundy.
Suspect Port will just take our Pick 43 and call it a day.
Why should they do that?
- Jan 20, 2015
- 3,272
- 6,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I would genuinely hope not. We would have to either draft or trade for another depth ruck anyway if we trade him out. We cant go into a season with only two rucks on our list, one of which hasn’t played a great deal. We also don’t have a key forward that could take the majority of ruck contests on a pinch now that Dixon has gone either.
I imagine port will do the right thing by Ivan in letting him go. Just hope that we get reasonable and fair value back.
Morro
Brownlow Medallist
Whilst it does happen, its incredibly rare clubs keep a player who publicly announce they want out to a specific club.
You guys over paid for Soldo at the time, he is now worth less than he was then. You cut your losses and celebrate the emergence of Sweet.
It does happen and it's happened to us with Ratugolea. I'd love to see Port do the same thing for once
If you add a one between the final two digits of said Grand Final it spells Port Adelaide.
yep. Port do this to other clubs - his opinion? Player wants out fair value.
Another club does this to Port? His opinon?
He’s contracted, pay up.
Typical footy nuffy.
Morro
Brownlow Medallist
Yeah but its so rare, also cant blame you for feeling that way.
Solda is contracted and Port need someone to stand under the high bombs in the goal square
Ain’t nobody coughing up no Pick 24 for Ivan Soldo brother.
Clubs tend to help players exit when they have personal issues. Forcing players to stay at a club/city they don’t want to be at isn’t overly productive for either party.
Last one I can think of at the Saints was Jamie Cripps who wanted to head back to WA. We got reamed on the trade but got him there.
It's not St Kildas fault Port overpaid for a backup ruck.
Exactly, it's Port's fault. So the least they can do is not give him away for peanuts! Otherwise it's a double **** up!
How is it not anymore obvious what i'm saying
And you'll also notice i said a fair price
Is there anything wrong with wanting a fair price for him?
You mean like Geelong and the Rat where Geelong forced Ratugolea to serve out his contract
You’re right we did but that only makes it more important to get part right otherwise we **** it up more
- Mar 19, 2020
- 16,744
- 46,982
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Pick 43 + F3rd for Soldo and pick 54
Pick 54 to Bulldogs for Jack Macrae
Pick 54 to Bulldogs for Jack Macrae
You got him in for Pick 29 (more or less).
You reckon he’s worth more or less than that after this year ?.
- Jan 20, 2015
- 3,272
- 6,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
About the same.
- Jan 20, 2015
- 3,272
- 6,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
And when you say more or less, are you saying that the other parts we paid are not worth anything? Because the extra parts on top of 29 equal more than you think you are offering in total.
Righto
Don’t tell me you gave more that that for Soldo ?.
What else did you give up for him ?!.
Pure_Ownage
TheBrownDog
They gave Fremantles future 2nd + p 41 + future 4th for him.
Similar threads
