Im with progress. Gotta move on
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm voting for the Cleve Hughes standDaniel RioliStand?PLAYERCARDSTART17Daniel Rioli
- Age
- 27
- Ht
- 179cm
- Wt
- 78kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.2
- 3star
- K
- 5.8
- 2star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- MG
- 179.2
- 3star
- D
- 8.1
- 2star
- K
- 4.9
- 2star
- HB
- 3.3
- 2star
- M
- 2.0
- 2star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- MG
- 144.9
- 3star
- D
- 9.0
- 3star
- K
- 3.8
- 2star
- HB
- 5.2
- 4star
- M
- 0.8
- 1star
- T
- 3.8
- 5star
- MG
- 160.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
I'm voting for the Cleve Hughes stand
Of course... Right next to the Princess Fiora non binary toilet blockWithin the Cleve Hughes stand the food and beverage section will be the Relton Roberts Pie Pavilion
Imagine how bad we'll play down at GMHBA at Moe by the sea....oh wait we're too big to play at that shit heap any more.will make us shitter when we play narrow non mcg style grounds . imagine how sh*t we're gonna be at etihad now
Probably a poor example using the KGI... connection to culture and place runs much deeper than a man made object/construct. So I think using the central message of KGI is supporting not getting attached to the stand's physical existence
What about Daniel Rioliwhy is the new stand not called the Jack Dyer centre ? they have gone with another indigenous bloke again and removed jack dyers name
Just asked that.lol.Daniel RioliStand?PLAYERCARDSTART17Daniel Rioli
- Age
- 27
- Ht
- 179cm
- Wt
- 78kg
- Pos.
- Def
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 11.2
- 3star
- K
- 5.8
- 2star
- HB
- 5.4
- 4star
- M
- 2.7
- 3star
- T
- 3.2
- 5star
- MG
- 179.2
- 3star
- D
- 8.1
- 2star
- K
- 4.9
- 2star
- HB
- 3.3
- 2star
- M
- 2.0
- 2star
- T
- 2.6
- 4star
- MG
- 144.9
- 3star
- D
- 9.0
- 3star
- K
- 3.8
- 2star
- HB
- 5.2
- 4star
- M
- 0.8
- 1star
- T
- 3.8
- 5star
- MG
- 160.2
- 3star
PLAYERCARDEND
Name one sporting organisation that would leave decisions like these to the membersThey should have opened the development plan to the members, with a variety of options.
Full development, part redevelopment, and so on.
A transparent, open, process of consulting.
Instead, they seek to impose a fait accompli.
They are not experts in development and don't pretend they are.
They can take a hike if they demolish the heritage.
I appreciate it's important to you... And that's ok...They should have opened the development plan to the members, with a variety of options.
Full development, part redevelopment, and so on.
A transparent, open, process of consulting.
Instead, they seek to impose a fait accompli.
They are not experts in development and don't pretend they are.
They can take a hike if they demolish the heritage.
I'd support that ...They should have opened the development plan to the members, with a variety of options.
Full development, part redevelopment, and so on.
A transparent, open, process of consulting.
Instead, they seek to impose a fait accompli.
They are not experts in development and don't pretend they are.
They can take a hike if they demolish the heritage.
Exactly, history is important but you can’t hold on to it at the expense of the future.Im with progress. Gotta move on
I don’t know why you bother posting on a forum if you just tell everybody who disagrees with you to take a hikeThe members pay fees over decades and have a right to be consulted on major plans.
The board are not experts in development pure and simple.
Take a hike.
there was also no consultation when they adopted borrusia dortmund's fluro yellowThe members pay fees over decades and have a right to be consulted on major plans.
The board are not experts in development, pure and simple.
There was no consultation and don't pretend there was.
And 100k people who love the club and have a spare $250 a year are?The members pay fees over decades and have a right to be consulted on major plans.
The board are not experts in development, pure and simple.
There was no consultation and don't pretend there was.
They don’t consult with us and say.. hey guys we’re looking at luring Tom Lynch from the Gold Coast next year.. gonna pay him 900k a year... you guys cool with that if we use your membership fees?The members pay fees over decades and have a right to be consulted on major plans.
The board are not experts in development, pure and simple.
There was no consultation and don't pretend there was.
Relton Robert's Refreshment Reserve...Within the Cleve Hughes stand the food and beverage section will be the Relton Roberts Pie Pavilion
Being ruled by emotion is exactly why we vote for a board to make this difficult decisions, we aren’t privy to the information they have to make these decisions to make a properly informed decision.The members pay fees over decades and have a right to be consulted on major plans.
The board are not experts in development, pure and simple.
There was no consultation and don't pretend there was.
The board don't sit there and draw the designs themselves mate, they go to professionals to make the call - the board are the ones who hire those people.The board are not experts in development, it is simply fraudulent to assert they are.
The board don't sit there and draw the designs themselves mate, they go to professionals to make the call - the board are the ones who hire those people.
What do you think it is they do?