Not dismissing it at all as it is unnecessary, but did you call the bloke who abused your missus a ' ****ing coke head campaigner' like Murphy called Carlisle?When I first came to play rugby in Australia I had to endure some filthy sledges. From the uninformed 'black c@&t' to the uninspiring 'fuzzy f@**@t' and through to the carefully crafted 'the problem with your team is there are too many Fijians' (there was only one). But the one which probably made me feel diminished the most was directed at my partner. It made me feel like I wasn't a man if I didn't stand up for her. And I couldn't stand up for her in any meaningful way because there are consequences for hitting your opponent.
So, I don't like the gist of the sledge. I think it is designed to diminish an opponent who should be respected, for no other reason than it is the right way to behave. Being able to respect your opponent is how I have taught my children to conduct themselves in the heat of a sporting contest.
Having, said that I don't like the way that Marc Murphy acted. I think it diminishes his persona in the eyes of the world. And his many friends are out there now trying to justify the unjustifiable. If, in the midst of everything he was copping he chose to show Jake some compassion as an injured opponent, it would have been the biggest slap in the face to every St Kilda player that had engaged in the sledging, and probably would have resulted in no more sledges ever against him.
Having said all of that I like the way the club has responded. We have gotten on the front foot, and with no narrative about baiting from the Blues, we have indicated we crossed the line and we have apologised.
I think Carlisle will love his captain just a little bit more.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk