jmac70
On the porch
Howe will be an excellent player for us.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think he will become a more consistent player.Howe will be an excellent player for us.
Who cares if he's tough or not.
He has skill and fulfils a need for us.
Yes patience is a virtue but do you honestly believe our list is ready to challenge any time soon even with Howe, Treloar and Aish?
I'd say for that to happen Aish needs to surprise us all by turning into a gun as getting Treloar will be offset by losing Swanny pretty soon.
What MarkT2 is saying is we're undergoing the second wave of the rebuild but at the same time won't have the access to elite youngsters in this and next years draft and that won't help our rebuild one bit. Unless of course we trade a proven player again but this won't help our cause either.
The rebuild started by Buckley was premature and has misfired.Are you talking this year or since Bucks grabbed the broom.
We have plenty of potential and exciting youngsters in Degoey, Crisp, Marsh, Maynard, Williams, Burger, Frost, Langdon, Grundy, Witts, Moore, Elliot, Adams, Broomhead & don't forget the BIG SHOW. Soon to add Treloar & Aish. Couple this with Pendles, Sidebottom, Reid, Greenwood, Sinclair, Cloke and future trades and we are looking strong. It's not an exact science and some will obviously perform and develop better than others. To suggest it's a misfired rebuild is ridiculous. BK is not upto it and Seeds has had his opportunity and TBH is soft as butter. I hope he makes it and good luck to him but I can't see it. There will be plenty more to come and go over time as we do what we need to do to build longterm success.
It's like they must have watched him play or something?I don't think people realise how low Kennedy's currency is...
The rebuild started by Buckley was premature and has misfired.
I agree re Kennedy but Seedsman is as good as Howe as a player. He'll be best 22 at Adelaide like Wellingham is at WCE. They will both be best 22 players in sides above us on the ladder.Upside??
Both Seedo and Kennedy would have languished in the 2's next year. Kennedy will get games because it's Melbourne but I find it hard to see Seedsman being in Adelaides best 22.
I thought that thread was supposed to be about Buckley's coaching?There is a megathread for that topic.
I thought that thread was supposed to be about Buckley's coaching?
I thought that thread was supposed to be about Buckley's coaching?
probably put to sleep by trade radio.Howe did Dave not start this thread?
I have stood back and that's why I can smell them. Broomhead is on a par with Seedsman. Adams can't kick. We don't have Treloar or Aish yet and if we get them we won't draft top end talent for 2 years. Moore I really like the look of and Grundy will be a good long term ruckman. Not sure how good but good enough. Varcoe is hardly young. Scharenburg has hardly played and frankly shown nothing. Hopefully he lives up to his draft position. Some do and some don't. There is no evidence for at this point. Most of the others have a hell of along way to go to and none are top end short of massive development. Langdon as I said will be solid at worst but he hasn't got any real spark to his game. Crisp is a solid player. There are plenty of them around. Cox hasn't even played a game. I do like the look of Marsh and, to a degree, Maynard but the former needs polish and the latter has a lot of development to do to make it. History says a few of those names won't make it. Hopefully most do but there simply isn't the top end talent.Moore, Grundy, Scharenberg, DeGoey, Treloar, Crisp, Greenwood, Langdon, Marsh, Howe, Adams, Broomhead, Langdon, Ramsay, Maynard, Varcoe, Marsh, Cox, Aish.
Perhaps you need to step back a bit to smell the roses.
Howe did Dave not start this thread?
Of course getting Treloar helps us but like I said before it will be offset by the loss of Swanny who had a great 2015 yet we were light years away from challenging. So even if Treloar does reach the same heights as Swanny our list will still need an injection of elite youth to become a legitimate contender in a couple of years.I can accept the premise that we won have access to elite young talent in next years draft given we are likely trading our 1st rd pick next year however we are getting access to elite young talent this year by trading in treloar.
So we really we miss out one 1 potentially elite player next year but get a known elite player this year. Surely that helps our rebuild not hinders it
I have stood back and that's why I can smell them. Broomhead is on a par with Seedsman. Adams can't kick. We don't have Treloar or Aish yet and if we get them we won't draft top end talent for 2 years. Moore I really like the look of and Grundy will be a good long term ruckman. Not sure how good but good enough. Varcoe is hardly young. Scharenburg has hardly played and frankly shown nothing. Hopefully he lives up to his draft position. Some do and some don't. There is not evidence for at this point. Most of the others have a hell of along way to go to and none are top end short of massive development. Langdon as I said will be solid at worst but he hasn't got any real spark to his game. Crisp is a solid player. there are plenty of them around. Cox hasn't even played a game.
Look, it's a decent list but it has cost us dearly and it is not capable of winning a flag IMO, which was the point of the rebuild and the inherent danger in the strategy,
Excellent and spot on post but you forgot De Goey, even though I don't share all the brouhaha about him.I have stood back and that's why I can smell them. Broomhead is on a par with Seedsman. Adams can't kick. We don't have Treloar or Aish yet and if we get them we won't draft top end talent for 2 years. Moore I really like the look of and Grundy will be a good long term ruckman. Not sure how good but good enough. Varcoe is hardly young. Scharenburg has hardly played and frankly shown nothing. Hopefully he lives up to his draft position. Some do and some don't. There is no evidence for at this point. Most of the others have a hell of along way to go to and none are top end short of massive development. Langdon as I said will be solid at worst but he hasn't got any real spark to his game. Crisp is a solid player. There are plenty of them around. Cox hasn't even played a game. I do like the look of Marsh and, to a degree, Maynard but the former needs polish and the latter has a lot of development to do to make it. History says a few of those names won't make it. Hopefully most do but there simply isn't the top end talent.
Look, it's a decent list but it has cost us dearly and it is not capable of winning a flag IMO, which was the point of the rebuild and the inherent danger in the strategy.
I'm not crying little fella, first part was a bit of a joke. Second part was yeah I would've liked a third rounder for BK, that's all, pick around 45-55.
Howe will help, I've posted as much as recently as last night.
I do have concerns over his type in finals though.
No need to get your panties in a bunch little doggie.
Did we really see enough of Kennedy to make a judgement on him? Most of the games he played were under 30% game time.