ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
Why are we resting Weitering.
Is he tired.
Weitering doesn't get tired, but after a busy pre-season it can help to reboot and run defrag...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why are we resting Weitering.
Is he tired.
Play him round 1 instead perhaps.I didn't count Plowman or Cripps. I meant KPP.
Would have liked to see Fisher given a another game. Especially on his home ground in front of family/
friends??
Might have to take it all back then... Was reading that he was 194...Jaksch is 197, he's not short. He's about 5-8 kgs lighter than what you'd like to see him playing at.
Look at it this way: we've got Pickett, Cuningham and Polson as our young smalls, and Weitering, McKay, Macreadie, Plowman, J. Silvagni and Marchbank as our young talls. The talls need an option other than Levi on the bench to help with rotations, so one of White or A. Silvagni plays.
As for the rest of the group, they get to operate with one spare in the final pre-season game, which leaves the senior guys in a full dress rehearsal. It checks out, so long as Lamb and one of White and A. Silvagni miss.
Sure, in the season proper, but in JLT? Should have got at least two games.I don't think it's unreasonable for the club to insist on him making a strong statement in the magoos before selection in the firsts and I'd hope they will assist in that by playing him consistently as either a KPF OR KPD in the NB's.
Sure, in the season proper, but in JLT? Should have got at least two games.
Don't see why we would bring in A Silvagni when we have so many defenders already with their hands up. I wasnt too pleased we picked him up instead of a rookie ruck in the first place. Just struggling to make sense of the selections
195, 191, 192, 194; three of them are contested types, none of them are high possession earners. I'm going with yes.Are the highlighted really talls? Although quite tall I see them as more mobile players. Cripps is tall, do we class him in the same bracket?
It's more that he's previously lacked enough muscle and fitness to play any AFL role, rather than his height magically makes him into a KPF.Might have to take it all back then... Was reading that he was 194...
195, 191, 192, 194; three of them are contested types, none of them are high possession earners. I'm going with yes.
I think it's a little harsh for Jones to be dropped for this game. His leads and defensive pressure in the forward line were pretty decent. The lack of clean delivery into the forward line makes it a little hard for him to do his job.
To be clear, I am suggesting they are players who are not really going to be driving midfield possession, rather providing a release through marking the footy. Of the four, Plowman is probably the player with the least flair.I disagree. Macreadie & Marchbank are very mobile and can be attacking players. Saying they are talls insinuates they are almost lock down players. What excites me about our young defensive options is that they can match up on anyone and create. Look at Hawks Cats & Swans over lay few years. All quite tall and mobile and if playing well as a group could stop anyone's
I have nothing to quote, but remember reading that he was doing a degree. Thought at the time that his AFL career may just be "workingi honestly think KJ doesnt have the desire to make it.
have heard some of his BOG performances on a saturday night in town. add that his body hasnt matured as expected and its obviously he lacks dedication to be an AFL footballer.
seems to be getting by on talent alone, its a shame. if he had the desire to improve such as SOJ or a judd in his youth, the kid could be a AFL KPP.
menzel appears in the same boat. bucket loads of talent, just lacks desire.
In my opinion our list is severely unbalanced. We have far too many tall defenders on our list now. We currently have Jaksch, Rowe, Macreadie, Silvagni, Weitering, Marchbank. Thats 6 key defenders or KPP. Include players like Gorringe, Phillips, Mackay, Casboult, Jones, Korcheck and Kreuzer.
We recruited Marchbank, macreadie and Silvagni in the last draft.
Have we gone overboard in recruiting defenders? Our midfield severely lacks depth and quality.
Midfielders should be an urgent priority.
I don't see how anyone can say macreadie has shown more than jaksch.
Don't see why we would bring in A Silvagni when we have so many defenders already with their hands up. I wasnt too pleased we picked him up instead of a rookie ruck in the first place. Just struggling to make sense of the selections
I get that Bolts wants Weitering to settle in down back before regularly playing him forward, but what happens if he kicks 1-2 goals a quarter every time they throw him forward.
I'd imagine pretty quickly he would be playing forward full time.
The other thing that might fast track Weitering playing forward is the development of Macreadie. If he comes on in leaps and bounds then something will have to give. Even Soapy wouldn't play 5 talls in the the backline, surely.
Bigger problem is they are all in the same age bracket, though I don't really count Gorringe as a starting ruck, and neither does the club. They want him to make it as a KPF first and foremost.I don't think any club has more than 4 ruckmen on their list. We have enough in number, unfortunately most have injury issues.
To be clear, I am suggesting they are players who are not really going to be driving midfield possession, rather providing a release through marking the footy. Of the four, Plowman is probably the least player with flair.