Joe Daniher

[SirJimi05]

And clubs would never tank? Clubs would never rout the salary cap either?

Just makes me wonder

You're still missing the point aren't you.

Spot the difference:

Club x tanks and ends up with the 2 best young guns in the country.
Club x cheats the cap so they can keep star midfielder on their list.
Club x manipulates father son rule just to get one up on a rival. They end up with a player they don't want, at an over inflated price but the rofl factor was worth it.

Which one is the odd one out?

 

[Yoda_]

You're still missing the point aren't you.

Spot the difference:

Club x tanking to secure a gun youngster
Club x cheating the cap to retain gun players
Club x manipulating father son rule ending up with a player they didnt want at an over inflated price just for the rofl we really showed them factor.

I got you now...

 

[Crimsons]

Wasn't Jetta our priority pick?

Spot On

 

[Crimsons]

I got you now...

LOL About time ...

 

[yaco55]

Maybe on BigFooty mock drafts. In the real world he was rated as a first rounder hence StKilda nominating pick 13 for him. Do you really think that a club would potentially derail their whole draft just to try and screw over another club? It is a luicrous suggestion.

All of the picks under the new system have been close to the mark in terms of where the recruiters and experts rated them. This is a far cry from the old system where clubs could use their last picks on absolute guns. Would you prefer that system?

Joe Daniher is regarded as a top 5 pick (currently). We will have to use our first pick to get him. What is wrong with that? If he was no good, no club would nominate him just to spite us. Maybe we should have nominated our first pick for Jaxson Barham. That would have really showed Collingwood.

Jimi

May not necessarily have to use our first pick - depending on our draft position.

We could have pick 4 - and would only have to use that Pick if teams with pick1,2 and 3 chose daniher, otherwise it goes to the next pick.

 

[TeamHurley]

It happened with Darcy didn't it? The roos picked him with an earlier pick which forced us to pick him up.

 

[Sill]

Jimi

May not necessarily have to use our first pick - depending on our draft position.

We could have pick 4 - and would only have to use that Pick if teams with pick1,2 and 3 chose daniher, otherwise it goes to the next pick.

But Sheedy has pick 1 LOL so he will do it just to p**s us off for shizzle !!!

End of the day you gotta be pretty happy that there is a good chance he will be touted as a pick between 1-5 and we can nab him in a compromised draft

It be nice to nab 2 young kids tho...

 

[Ben the Gooner]

ive always wondered with the f/s rule. What happens if we trade our first +2nd rounder in that draft. Can we pick him up with our 3rd rounder as that would be a first pick?

i would have thought that would be the best way to get most value.

No, because the bidding is done pre-trade week.

In 2007, we couldn't have traded pick 39.

 

[Towno78]

But Sheedy has pick 1 LOL so he will do it just to p**s us off for shizzle !!!

End of the day you gotta be pretty happy that there is a good chance he will be touted as a pick between 1-5 and we can nab him in a compromised draft

It be nice to nab 2 young kids tho...

This is the 2012 draft, not 2011. Sheedy will only have pick 1 if they come last in their inaugural year, and it will not be compromised.

 

[Sill]

This is the 2012 draft, not 2011. Sheedy will only have pick 1 if they come last in their inaugural year, and it will not be compromised.

ah yes........how silly of me they will get draft picks next year my bad.....

 

[RUNVS]

I was just on a Swans forum and some suggested there that Essendon have a tough decision to make in regards to Joe Daniher as you will need to use a 1st round draft pick to secure him and even though he appears to be a very good potential player Essendon really need midfeilders and don't really need a young KP player as you already have Hurley, Pears, Gumbleton, Bellchambers and Hooker not to mention Joe's brother who can't get a game at the moment.

I was just wondering what Essendon fans thoughts on this issue were?

 

[Burzum]

Non issue. We will take him no matter what.

You don't pass on top 3 talent.

 

[Phat Toni]

I was just on a Swans forum and some suggested there that Essendon have a tough decision to make in regards to Joe Daniher as you will need to use a 1st round draft pick to secure him and even though he appears to be a very good potential player Essendon really need midfeilders and don't really need a young KP player as you already have Hurley, Pears, Gumbleton, Bellchambers and Hooker not to mention Joe's brother who can't get a game at the moment.

I was just wondering what Essendon fans thoughts on this issue were?

Best available > than positional picking

 

[Towno78]

I was just on a Swans forum and some suggested there that Essendon have a tough decision to make in regards to Joe Daniher as you will need to use a 1st round draft pick to secure him and even though he appears to be a very good potential player Essendon really need midfeilders and don't really need a young KP player as you already have Hurley, Pears, Gumbleton, Bellchambers and Hooker not to mention Joe's brother who can't get a game at the moment.

I was just wondering what Essendon fans thoughts on this issue were?

Since it is the 2012 draft in question, we will have 2 additional first round midfielders plus others on our list, so perhaps our need for midfielders won't be so dire by then.

 

[Hirdman]

Howdy,

Is this Darcy's brother? was this that Daniher that was the top class fencer? I thought he had taken up football late and looked pretty average - same Dainher??

 

[Burzum]

Howdy,

Is this Darcy's brother? was this that Daniher that was the top class fencer? I thought he had taken up football late and looked pretty average - same Dainher??

Yes, and Ned was the top class fencer. He's eligible this year.

 

[Hirdman]

Yes, and Ned was the top class fencer. He's eligible this year.

Thanks

 

[Kong]

$10 says we draft (perhaps rookie) Ned to get Joe.

 

[AndyLesPaul]

GWS keen on Daniher

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/98937/default.aspx

ESSENDON may be keen on securing exciting youngster Joe Daniher, the son of Essendon full back Anthony, but they will have to fight off the interest of Team GWS.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/98937/default.aspx

"He (Daniher) is one of the best young players in Australia in that age group and there are three alternatives and whoever ends up bottom in the year of that draft will get him or Sydney or Essendon will," Sheedy said.

If we want him, you aren't getting him Sheeds. No ****ing way.
Wait, does this mean under the rules, that GWS can draft him and we can't FS him?

 

[Prog Rocker]

Re: GWS keen on Daniher

Essendon can F/S Joe Daniher still,i wouldn't worry too much about what Sheedy/GWS says about talking to him.Joe has said he wants to play for the Essendon Football Club AND he is already part of the JAMES HIRD ACADEMY at Windy Hill.

 

[windyhill]

Re: GWS keen on Daniher

Go away sheedy.

 

[Duckworth]

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/tabid/208/newsid/98937/default.aspx

I wonder how much Sheedy will try to screw us.

 

[AndyLesPaul]

Sheedys Plan:
Draft Ned and Trade for Darcy

Get A.Daniher as an assistant coach

Defs.

 

[whats_at_stake]

So under F/S if we were to both nominate him- normally we use our last pick but if Sheeds also nominates say a first rounder then we have to use second round? Is this correct?

 

[DaSawx]

So under F/S if we were to both nominate him- normally we use our last pick but if Sheeds also nominates say a first rounder then we have to use second round? Is this correct?

If GWS finish lower than us and nominate a 1st rounder we have to use our first rounder, if they finish higher *cough* and nominate their first rounder, and no team below us nominate their, we only have to use a 2nd rounder.