- Aug 18, 2018
- 31,816
- 54,110
- AFL Club
- Geelong
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What if Cerra turns into a bust?Will either turn out to be better than Cerra or a total bust.
Did u miss the part that had pick 32 going the other way??? Never mind... GHU
I like the sentiment Snuff, but not sure all clubs share this view. Fages would be right with you along with many others I imagine, but hard arse and/or desparate clubs can, will and do turn a blind eye to a 'players preference' if it will disadvantage them too much. You raise a good point. If I'm understanding you correctly, I agree, there should be more emphasis on players wishes, but I don't think its in vogue right now and may never come to fruition universally.
An example where we played hard ball, and payed off big time, was the Weller trade. Lyon folded his arms and went something like 'nup, give us pick 2 or forget it'. I thought it was both galling and genius. We ended up with Brayshaw for Weller. If that was Ross Lyon who made that call, then he deserves a LOT of credit, IMO.
So I think the 'players needs as #1' is always going to be on a case by case basis for any club.
I hope I understood your post properly after all that, he he.
Ummm it is one 2nd rounder. The other you talk of is a swap of our pick 32 for freos pick 27. U know... a 5 spot upgrade.
Slightly? You get the equivalent of pick 20 for a player not rated enough internally to be given constant game time. I would think Geelong make out like bandits in that deal. If I'm Freo I'm not budging on pick 27 for Clark. Hasn't shown anywhere near enough for a mid 20's pick and a 5 pick upgrade, his contract can't magically make him twice as valuable as he is now.Agreed..its slightly in geelongs favour but if they are planning to keep clark otherwise its not crazy.
Hahah 2 second rounders now?
Next week it'll be 3 firsts and a car.
11 games over 2 years peeps. 11 games.
Your too nice for DTFA board mate. I was just having some with Glek, who seems to have suddenly flipped on things he's said previously now he's dropped the act a bit. I wasnt being serious.I like the sentiment Snuff, but not sure all clubs share this view. Fages would be right with you along with many others I imagine, but hard arse and/or desparate clubs can, will and do turn a blind eye to a 'players preference' if it will disadvantage them too much. You raise a good point. If I'm understanding you correctly, I agree, there should be more emphasis on players wishes, but I don't think its in vogue right now and may never come to fruition universally.
An example where we played hard ball, and payed off big time, was the Weller trade. Lyon folded his arms and went something like 'nup, give us pick 2 or forget it'. I thought it was both galling and genius. We ended up with Brayshaw for Weller. If that was Ross Lyon who made that call, then he deserves a LOT of credit, IMO.
So I think the 'players needs as #1' is always going to be on a case by case basis for any club.
I hope I understood your post properly after all that, he he.
Slightly? You get the equivalent of pick 20 for a player not rated enough internally to be given constant game time. I would think Geelong make out like bandits in that deal. If I'm Freo I'm not budging on pick 27 for Clark. Hasn't shown anywhere near enough for a mid 20's pick and a 5 pick upgrade, his contract can't magically make him twice as valuable as he is now.
Your too nice for DTFA board mate. I was just having some with Glek, who seems to have suddenly flipped on things he's said previously now he's dropped the act a bit. I wasnt being serious.
Glek's trade suggestion while I think is overs is along the lines of what I've posted already. I think we'll keep one of 25 or 27 and give up a future 2nd as a result but I think he's close
That sounds like the same thing he was told this time last year, too.Hes not unrated at geelong hes been injured and will play a lot next year if he stays.
Fair enough is your view but i think we wont trade him for 27 alone its not worth it to us.
That sounds like the same thing he was told this time last year, too.
Learn to prioritise your players - duh and they wont want to leave. Take it to the bank - Jackson, Pickett, Rivers contracts on the way .... will be timed to be announced when best suits MFC marketing department regarding memberships sales.
Onya Snuff. Yeah, I'm not too quick on the uptake sometimes, he he.Your too nice for DTFA board mate. I was just having some with Glek, who seems to have suddenly flipped on things he's said previously now he's dropped the act a bit. I wasnt being serious.
Glek's trade suggestion while I think is overs is along the lines of what I've posted already. I think we'll keep one of 25 or 27 and give up a future 2nd as a result but I think he's close
Hes not unrated at geelong hes been injured and will play a lot next year if he stays.
Fair enough is your view but i think we wont trade him for 27 alone its not worth it to us.
I guess Freo putting a 4 year (750k per year) contract in front of Cerra at the commencement of the 2021 season is not prioritising our player. I learn something everyday on bigfooty!Not flipped one bit. You are just making yourself look like a one-town one-club boy. Cerra is OC - get him to the club of his choice, Carlton.
Clark is contracted - pretty basic stuff really. Its not Blues fault Cerra wants to leave, its not Cats obligation to giveaway contracted players.
Learn to prioritise your players - duh and they wont want to leave. Take it to the bank - Jackson, Pickett, Rivers contracts on the way .... will be timed to be announced when best suits MFC marketing department regarding memberships sales.
I guess Freo putting a 4 year (750k per year) contract in front of Cerra at the commencement of the 2021 season is not prioritising our player. I learn something everyday on bigfooty!
So all we had to do was offer Cerra an extended contract last year.
Pretty basic stuff really - if he wont sign ..... Fine take the gamble but you lost, he wants to leave.
Freo think we have 1 rule for Freo supporters & 1 rule for every other club. The pressure is off the Blues - now over to Freo to get the deal done - player has nominated. Get your OOC to where he wants to go for less money than you where prepared to pay.
weird that this thread is up to page 68 and no Freo supporters seem to rate Clark all that much, what were the last 67 pages even about?
It’s funny how all your sunshine and rainbows seem to end up with Freo getting f’ed in the ass
Sent from my iPad using BigFooty.com
lol. This is some of the dumbest shit I've read on here for a while. Which part of Melbourne's 57 year rebuild did you play a key part in?Sure to be liked by all the Freo posters - but its your club only you can do something about it.
Instead of just talking the talk, Freo literally put our money where our mouth is - can't do more than that. As a 21 year member of Freo I am not critical of the club on this occasion - I have certainly been critical on multiple other occasions. You have spewed such pearls of wisdom over the last couple of days about how our club should act. Can I respectfully suggest you instead bask in your premiership glory - it has been over 50 years in the making.hahah - fat lot of good that did you. Duh you should have started talks long before the start of season 2021. Sure dont need to announce it if he signs.
Dockers gambled and lost - such is life.