- Sep 23, 2019
- 2,150
- 2,428
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Thank you o wise one.Yes , the world is called bigfooty.
Lesson complete.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
Thank you o wise one.Yes , the world is called bigfooty.
Lesson complete.
Time for McCrae, Lipinkski and McStay to join the party.
Still plenty in the tank.
Still 1 game plus percentage clear
BT? Pav threw it out there on the coverage I watched. I just can’t see them sending him back out there with that type of damage in play.Pretty sure that "syndesmosis" was Brian Taylors" on air diagnosis.
Who or what is First Crack?“First Crack” all agreed it’s a 4 week penalty.
“First Crack” all agreed it’s a 4 week penalty.
How the hell did Gina win WA of the year?
An afl show. With David king, Montagna and Anthony Hudson.Who or what is First Crack?
It’s a comedy show on fox footy on Sunday night. It features fox footy’s biggest clown, sorry premier footy expert, David king and his offsider Leigh Montagna plus a host that tries to add some sensibility to it all. It’s where you to get to hear their opinions from the round just gone that they will then spend the rest of the week fluctuating on and then back away from completely 7 days later. A very lighthearted way to end the weekend, always good for a Sunday night laughWho or what is First Crack?
If you are watching on slow motion it is late but not so during play, it was a mistake and they will out him for it but 4 wks is over the top.Absolutely nailed him. It was late and he got the bloke flush in the head, with the point of his shoulder. Four weeks would be a good outcome.
Should be 3 but will probably get 4AFL Web site also said 3, so that seems to be the consensus.’
There is no possibility of it being 2. Maybe brush up on the rules.Hate seeing people go for this.
Feet on the ground at point of impact, not until after contact due to force do they come off slightly.
Most the contact to the body, Hewett like most AFL players these days doesn't try protect himself adding to it.
Height difference and as mentioned him (hewett) lowering slightly caused shoulder to head contact.
Due to AFL panic stations and DOC laws this will see at least 2 and up to 4.
But I don't agree it is worthy of it. Intent matters and Degoeys intent was not to take him high or out.
if it’s careless that would make it 3?There is no possibility of it being 2. Maybe brush up on the rules.
You are right about intent matters. Luckily De Goey was assessed as careless.
Yep - although it is expressed as 3+ so there is the possibility they could go higher - once it is at the tribunal they can go where they like. I reckon 3 is on the money.if it’s careless that would make it 3?
Forget about the Cripps decision. That was a legal technicality. Nothing to do with the act itself.Watching it again in real speed I still do not think the intent is there to do real damage and De Goey was already in motion to bump before Hewett had handballed another thing is I do not the Eagles players around it thought there was any real malice in the bump, that,s my view anyway.
Eagles players would come from everywhere if they thought really bad and you just do not see it,he made a mistake and he will surely pay a price but if Cripps can get off with far more intent then it is certainly double standards somewhere.
Murphy got knocked out 50 mtrs off the ball and now they are saying 4 weeks for something that happened in play, he should get a couple but 4 weeks, please that,s rubbish.
Excatly. And the bed wetters in the media are all scratching their heads wonering why West Coast didnt "fly the flag". Perhaps because they arent sensationalist dickheads like some of these media knobs. Apart from SheedWatching it again in real speed I still do not think the intent is there to do real damage and De Goey was already in motion to bump before Hewett had handballed another thing is I do not the Eagles players around it thought there was any real malice in the bump, that,s my view anyway.
Eagles players would come from everywhere if they thought really bad and you just do not see it,he made a mistake and he will surely pay a price but if Cripps can get off with far more intent then it is certainly double standards somewhere.
Murphy got knocked out 50 mtrs off the ball and now they are saying 4 weeks for something that happened in play, he should get a couple but 4 weeks, please that,s rubbish.
Like **** it would anymore then 3 is excessiveAbsolutely nailed him. It was late and he got the bloke flush in the head, with the point of his shoulder. Four weeks would be a good outcome.
If offered 3 weeks, take it and run.Yep - although it is expressed as 3+ so there is the possibility they could go higher - once it is at the tribunal they can go where they like. I reckon 3 is on the money.
The 3 weeks mentioned is based on the notion that this is the starting point (for penalty) for any action that gets sent directly to the MRO. The MRO may deem more or less, depending on arguments. One thing's for sure, this will be trial by media at its finest!AFL Web site also said 3, so that seems to be the consensus.