Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think you should make decisions that are based on the upside and potential for success rather than the worrying about the PR situation if it goes balls up.
If Leppitsch was the best candidate at the end of the process, then he is the right appointment.
With an untried coach there is no basis for making a decision based on upside, you don't know if anyone can coach until they have a crack.
Genuine question because i'm having a mental blank.
Has a past player ever been a successful coach within 10 years from retiring as a player at the club they've taken over?
HirdGenuine question because i'm having a mental blank.
Has a past player ever been a successful coach within 10 years from retiring as a player at the club they've taken over?
He said successfulHird
Well with that approach there will be no new senior coaches ever. Not sure I want to see a 90 year old Mick Malthouse coaching my club in 2040.
Has it actually been explained why Voss was sacked?
Can you say that again?James Hird.
There are usually plenty of good options who didn't play for the club.
Voss got sacked because Rockliff wins the brownlow if he doesn't play every second week as a forward.
Yes, but it seems there was a better option that did play for the club. As has been said, he wasn't even originally amongst those headheaded for interviews. He really came from the clouds and won it on his own merits. Would be stupid to eliminate the best candidate on account of the fact they played for the club.
Yeah it will suck for a while if it ends badly but it could also be balls to the wall awesome if it is a success.
You are more than welcome to prefer your club to have a different policy.
Paul Roos.Genuine question because i'm having a mental blank.
Has a past player ever been a successful coach within 10 years from retiring as a player at the club they've taken over?
With an untried coach there is no basis for making a decision based on upside, you don't know if anyone can coach until they have a crack. There is just a lot more baggage in terms of getting rid of a bad coach who is also a past player.
I think clubs can be conflicted when hiring ex players as coaches. Laidley for North, Buckley for Pies, Primus for Port, there are a lot of candidates that go back and coach their old club that do not have the same kind of impact as looking outside the club, creates a lot more angst when it is time to show them the door as well.
I would not want my club to ever again give a past player as an untried coach the job, I wouldn't mind someone returning to the club like Clarkson or Longmire down the road now that they have shown they can coach, just don't think it is good for club morale to be shooting past players in the head career-wise.
This stinks of Matthew Primus' appointment IMO. Former favourite son gets a job at his old club, despite not being highly rated enough that any other club would even consider him for a senior coaching role. Hopefully for Brisbane it works out, but I wouldn't be happy with this appointment if I was a Lions fan.
This stinks of Matthew Primus' appointment IMO. Former favourite son gets a job at his old club, despite not being highly rated enough that any other club would even consider him for a senior coaching role.
This stinks of Matthew Primus' appointment IMO. Former favourite son gets a job at his old club, despite not being highly rated enough that any other club would even consider him for a senior coaching role, let alone give him the role. Hopefully for Brisbane it works out, but I wouldn't be happy with this appointment if I was a Lions fan.