![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/west_coast.png)
- Apr 30, 2015
- 14,051
- 25,372
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Trump is 78. Far more likely to collapse, I would've thought.Can’t wait for the debate. She will collapse
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: GWS Giants v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 65% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
AFLW 2024 - Round 3 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Trump is 78. Far more likely to collapse, I would've thought.Can’t wait for the debate. She will collapse
Trying to debate with you is like watching a pinball machine.
Where has Kamala Harris said that Trump should be disqualified for using doctored crowd sizes?
Sorry I missed your sarcasm. I didnt look at who was posting. You all just blend into one.Kamala has said Trump's crowds are doctored using AI, that this constitutes cheating, and that he should be disqualified?
We all look the same?Sorry I missed your sarcasm. I didnt look at who was posting. You all just blend into one.
Sorry I missed your sarcasm. I didnt look at who was posting. You all just blend into one.
I'm beginning to think she didn't say itI wasn't being sarcastic. I was asking where she said it, which you've predictably ignored.
Because crowd sizes at rallies is the least exciting thing to discuss outside of AFL crowd sizes on here. It means nothingI wasn't being sarcastic. I was asking where she said it, which you've predictably ignored.
Because crowd sizes at rallies is the least exciting thing to discuss outside of AFL crowd sizes on here. It means nothing
Im engaged in the campaign. I havent got involved in the crowd sizes. Other than replying to you.You seem to be highly engaged in it though, as does Trump.
And you've ignored it again. So Harris didn't say it?
PreciselyBecause crowd sizes at rallies is the least exciting thing to discuss outside of AFL crowd sizes on here. It means nothing
Im engaged in the campaign. I havent got involved in the crowd sizes. Other than replying to you.
What answer can I give you thats stops this little crusade of yours?
Might just be easier to out you in ignore. You're not going to be happy with any answer that isnt agreeing with you.
Sounds like something off script. So I'm assuming not.So ... did she or didn't she?
Wrong about what? Where did I say she did say it. I just said there was a tweet posted on here claiming the same thing. Dont blame me for your lack of comprehension skills.So you'll put me on ignore, rather than just say you're wrong?
![]()
Wrong about what? Where did I say she did say it. I just said there was a tweet posted on here claiming the same thing. Dont blame me for your lack of comprehension skills.
Wut? Do you have a paper bag handy. Put your head between your legs and breathe into it. You seem to be hyperventilatingThere was a post about Trump losing his mind on social media about Harris AI-doctoring a rally photo and that she should be disqualified.
You then said that other people have said the same thing about Trump faking his crowd sizes.
This is obviously a ridiculous false equivalence, so I then asked you when Harris had ever said anything about Trump AI-doctoring his crowd photos.
You then tried to ignore it, play dumb, then pretend you didn't actually care.
And now you're pretending it was out of context.
To sum things up - you talk a lot of sh*t.
Wut? Do you have a paper bag handy. Put your head between your legs and breathe into it. You seem to be hyperventilating
Don't think you understand politics.Can’t wait for the debate. She will collapse
National Public Radio reviewed the transcript of Trump’s news conference and found at least 162 misstatements, exaggerations and outright lies in 64 minutes. That’s more than two a minute. A remarkable achievement. Certainly problematic for a person running to lead the free world, where staff, businesses and allies have to be able to rely on his word.I'm beginning to think she didn't say it![]()
Don't think you understand politics.
She doesn't need to outperform Trump to win the debate.
Her bar is Bidens last effort.
And she's a lawyer.
Is it gonna fix our C-o-L issues, renationalise our resources or stop US military assets and Amberly AFB being nuclear targets?It matters hugely to australias way of living. Far more than anyone realises.
Brilliant. POTY.Biden was the most nothing vanilla shittruck candidate to ever be nominated- neither his record nor his policies were of note and he had the charisma of a tin of sardines.
He was also geriatric.
However he had the distinct advantage of not being Hilary Clinton and this clinched the nom for him.
In 2020 he won a resounding victory on a platform of not only not being Hilary but also not being Trump!
Harris has not only the enviable advantage of not being Hilary or Trump but also brings to the table vast experience in not being Biden.
All these factors have energised the Democratic base into the stratosphere.
Also Walz.
Goofballs. Seriously what do they pump him with?
Goofballs. Seriously what do they pump him with?
But here's the image posted on X. That was then shared here before being fact checked.