I thought recency bias would win out.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A lot of Lockett's time at St Kilda was away from TV with the occasional 30 minute highlights on a Saturday nightLockett's career was also far more biased toward Saints than Swans, he was 11 years at Saints and 5 years at Swans but still I would think most under 40s would think of him as more Swan than Saint. As time goes on that perception just gets stronger.
Franklin is close to 50/50 between the clubs.
Underselling Plugger a bit there. I'd say his highlight reel is impacted by the lack of wall to wall TV coverage like he get now.The reason you don’t see a lot of Lockett highlights other than his 1300th (and the Essendon prelim behind) is because his highlight reel is pretty boring - it’s 15m lead > chest mark 40m out > regulation drop punt. He’d just regularly do it 10 times a game
Franklin did the spectacular. And most of the best ones were in the Hawks jumper.
He’s still got dozens of Sydney highlights that would be the best thing most players ever do, but post-2016 (probably 2014) he was athletically in decline.
Those Hooker goals, or the hurdling goal, or the Pies prelim goal, will be played forever. Nothing he did in a Swans jumper was individually as spectacular.
I’ll always think of him as a Swan. I don’t think most fans will though.
Underselling Plugger a bit there. I'd say his highlight reel is impacted by the lack of wall to wall TV coverage like he get now.
Franklin more spectacular of course but Plugger was a lot more than what you described here.
Put another way, where does buddy rank all time in each club if you ignore he played at another team.
I’ve certainly got matthews dunstall Hudson snr in front of him at the hawks then it gets debatable
Where is the premiership tally?
I mean I am biased so Lockett.Lockett or Franklin?
There needs to be a "both" option.
4 All Australians at both clubs, 2 Coleman medals at both clubs.
Yes he won two flags for the Hawks and none at the Swans, but he also kicked his 1000th goal in Swans colours, and I know from history that Tony Lockett's most replayed moment was his 1300th goal so it will likely be Buddy's too.
He accomplished way too much at both clubs to say he will be remembered as a Hawk or Swan.
[/QUOTE
He kicked the last 100 goal season with us. I'd argue that's about as memorable as the 1000th. He probably kicked more miraculous goals and had slightly more impact as a Hawks player. Would have kicked more with us had he not missed alot of shots too. He was more marketable at Sydney and a better mark. Not alot between both clubs TBH. Was brilliant for both
Disagree. He's goal average for each club would tell you he was slightly better for us.I mean I am biased so Lockett.
Its an interesting take though in regards to Sydney.
I would argue Lockett's signing was the most important signing in Sydney's modern history he made them relevant again.
But Buddy played the better footy at Sydney
You are hardly a credible source of opinion in this. I guess being a former Essendon supporter though who Prime Buddy dined out on you would say Hawks I suppose.Hawks and easily. I appreciate what he’s done for us but his best years were with Hawthorn. Still a farce he didn’t go close to the Brownlow that 08 year I think it was.
Both. Just like Lockett. Was already a champion at his first club. Became an all time legend by the time he'd finished at the Swans.
As I said, the greats are generally even limited to just one or two iconic clips that get played years down the line on repeat when discussing them.
Even Ablett Snr and Carey are generally just defined by 1 or 2 clips these days and they were human highlight reels.
If I was to guess it will be:
1. His 1000th goal
2. Hooker goal
As the two that get played in 10-20 years when talking about him on TV shows. Depending on the order of those two clips will determine if he is remembered as a Swan or Hawk, it's that simple.
I reckon his hurdle goal is better than either of those highlights.As I said, the greats are generally even limited to just one or two iconic clips that get played years down the line on repeat when discussing them.
Even Ablett Snr and Carey are generally just defined by 1 or 2 clips these days and they were human highlight reels.
If I was to guess it will be:
1. His 1000th goal
2. Hooker goal
As the two that get played in 10-20 years when talking about him on TV shows. Depending on the order of those two clips will determine if he is remembered as a Swan or Hawk, it's that simple.
Sorry don’t know why that first post was quoted.Lockett or Franklin?
I think he was saying Buddy played better footy for Sydney than Lockett did.Disagree. He's goal average for each club would tell you he was slightly better for us.
898 for Saints, 462 for Swans. Much of his time at St Kilda was when it was the old VFL, before the national comp too, when the care factor was far lower outside Victoria.What?
Lockett kicked nearly 1,000 goals for the Saints. About 400 for the Swans.
898 for Saints, 462 for Swans. Much of his time at St Kilda was when it was the old VFL, before the national comp too, when the care factor was far lower outside Victoria.