What was with that ruck infringement that got them a shot at goal? Did we not nominate a ruck?
Ryder put his hand up, but the eyes in the back of the umpire's head didn't see it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
What was with that ruck infringement that got them a shot at goal? Did we not nominate a ruck?
Ryder put his hand up, but the eyes in the back of the umpire's head didn't see it.
Yeah he's pritty easy to miss isn't he. Isn't it their job to look for the ruck? **** me dead.Ryder put his hand up, but the eyes in the back of the umpire's head didn't see it.
Really what is the point of this comment in a thread specifically about whether you thought it was a free kick? People want to discuss it and until this morning I hadn't seen a replay so wanted to see opinions on this. There are many threads where you can blame everything but the free kick.
Point is obvious, I don't care if it was a free kick or not and think it's a worthwhile opinion for the thread.
This, coupled with the Kennedy 'goal' that Howard claimed was touched and according to the guys on Triple M after the game was CLEARLY touched but because they didn't have enough time to go through all the angles due to not being asked to do an official review before the game was restarted in the first final that went to extra time...let's just say when Richmond win the flag, I'm not going to be in the least bit surprised.
It's not. The comment has the potential to derail the thread and as a mod you should know better.
The thread specifically asks was it a free and your response is I don't care I want you to talk about everything that's wrong with the club.
Go to one of the threads that talks about that if that's what you want.
Fine, I hope as a mod you apply the same standard of assessment to every single post in this thread that isn't in the affirmative or against the OP's question. I already see a couple of examples worthy of your rigour.
Correct.
The first 5-10mins of the first quarter, Not impacting the scoreboard in the 3rd quarter despite dominating and Impey being in the side cost us the game.
I too would like to know about the non 30 second call. Shockingly bad umpiring!
Didnit cost us no, but I'm jaded from geelong.
No it didn't cost us last night but....
The same time given to Charlie at Kardinia Park and we wouldn't, make that may not, have been playing an elimination final last night.
I knew what you were saying and I was agreeing with youI'm not saying it cost us, I am asking why it wasn't okay on, live it confused me
MOD FIGHT!
If we're going to start a thread about an umpiring decision from last night, this is the one I want started. The Shuey free kick was a mistake, but an understandable one for an umpire who had to make a split second decision to make. But what sort of ****ing campaigner deliberately chooses to not even bother to review that call in extra time of an elimination final!?
That was the exact situation that the score review was bought in for. But that goal umpire decided that was the time to stamp his authority on the game, and it cost us a final.
MOD FIGHT!
And I thought the Tier One Clique shitfight the other week was awesome. Mod fight is peak Port board posting.