Vic Lidia Thorpe: Not the subject for every thread!

Remove this Banner Ad

Seeing as Lidia discussion is cropping up across multiple threads, let's have us a thread for people who want to discuss her contribution to Australian politics.

It should go without saying but seeing as she's a bit of a beacon for controversy - for a variety of reasons - let's just remind ourselves what the board rules are around racism and sexism, shall we?
You agree to not use the Service to submit or link to any Content which:
  • is dangerous to health, anti-vax, Covid denial etc,
  • is hateful, including sympathetic discussion of far-right/neo-Nazi tropes,
  • misinformation or disinformation,
  • defamatory,
  • threatening,
  • abusive,
  • bigotry,
  • likely to offend,
  • is spam or spam-like,
  • contains adult or objectionable content,
  • risks copyright infringement,
  • encourages unlawful activity (including illegal drug use, buying, selling etc),
  • or otherwise violates any laws,
  • or contains personal information of others.
Standard board rules apply, but let's make this abundantly clear: let's play nicely in here.

Go nuts.
 
Everything changed when Stoker spoke up and was instantly believed.
Yeah, the American/Murdoch style sportification of politics really does provide cover for the expression of some of the more appalling values people hold along the lines of racism, sexism etc.

But even if it may be calculated, surely pollies from the Nationals showing more human decency than some of the haters and losers in this thread is eye opening.


There are few perfect victims. Dismissing something as serious as sexual assault allegations out of hand due to party affiliation, personality and so on, suggests it's worth looking inwards about why you (the universal usage here) may respond the way you do.
 
I'm lost. Uhh, yes.

Haha, serves me right for posting on BF at the same time as discussing the issue with someone in person.
I meant to write "Stoker does not have more credibility than Thorpe".

Interesting that Bridget McKenzie of all people, now backs Thorpe's course of action.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Maybe because no one was surprised?
(Apologies if that's what you're already inferring.)

But even if many knew, or had an inkling, about Van (which I think.is the case), they couldn't bring themselves to accept Thorpe's claim. Because she's a "liar"... and not a white Liberal female senator.
Alternate POV - thorpe saying it is "well, its one person, its a he says she says". A second person says the same thing its now (ok this is probably an issue) then when the third comes in its (oh shit this is real)

thats my view. Deliberately ignoring all the racial overtones/ partisan implications.
 
Alternate POV - thorpe saying it is "well, its one person, its a he says she says". A second person says the same thing its now (ok this is probably an issue) then when the third comes in its (oh s**t this is real)

thats my view. Deliberately ignoring all the racial overtones/ partisan implications.
Dutton already knew about the 3 complaints, it was common knowledge in the Liberal party.
 
Dutton already knew about the 3 complaints, it was common knowledge in the Liberal party.
Sorry was more meaning how the average poster here may interpret events (unless you are saying we all should have known about stoker and the third one?)
 
Probably cheered her on when she used Parliamentary Privilege to accuse another Senator of sexually assaulting her, then later on took it back.

Surely the Senate has to sanction her - though for her supporters that will just be proof that she is a champion fighting against the system, rather than a moron flog who clearly is out of her depth and has no actual idea what she is doing.
She should apologise at the least for taking it back.
She is after all a bit of a loose canon.

That said, the two Liberals who came forward immediately after her crazy, unwarranted out burst ended Van's career, further crippled the out of touch Libs and forced Dutton appear an absolute halfwit on national TV at absolute best.

That said.
Even if entertaining, a Nutter.
Sanction her
 
Dutton already knew about the 3 complaints, it was common knowledge in the Liberal party.
Read the original claims detailed by the late Kimberly Kitching, the first person to raise the Higgins "event", and you will realise that pretty swiftly it was pretty common knowledge throughout Parliament.

Apart from the alleged crime itself I think the biggest question is why...............was the alleged crime scene cleaned as a matter of "urgency"?
Why was a special crew called in after hours to"clean" the entire area?
Who
She should apologise at the least for taking it back.
She is after all a bit of a loose canon.

That said, the two Liberals who came forward immediately after her crazy, unwarranted out burst ended Van's career, further crippled the out of touch Libs and forced Dutton appear an absolute halfwit on national TV at absolute best.

That said.
Even if entertaining, a Nutter.
Sanction her
What do you disagree about?
 
She should apologise at the least for taking it back.
She is after all a bit of a loose canon.

That said, the two Liberals who came forward immediately after her crazy, unwarranted out burst ended Van's career, further crippled the out of touch Libs and forced Dutton appear an absolute halfwit on national TV at absolute best.

That said.
Even if entertaining, a Nutter.
Sanction her
She's not a nutter.The nutters are the far right wing politicians who ignore climate change ect.
That's what parliamentary priviledge is for, to reveal the truth without fear of being sued.She was proved correct and now a sex pest has to go away. What's wrong with that process?
The sex pest was preaching hypocritically and deserved to be called out in the interest of truth and transperancy.
 
Dutton already knew about the 3 complaints, it was common knowledge in the Liberal party.
Read the original claims detailed by the late Kimberly Kitching, the first person to raise the Higgins "event", and you will realise that pretty swiftly it was pretty common knowledge throughout Parliament.

Apart from the alleged crime itself I think the biggest question is why...............was the alleged crime scene cleaned as a matter of "urgency"?
Why was a special crew called in after hours to"clean" the entire area?

Tampering with a potential crime scene is a pretty serious call.

Who made the call?

Why?
 
She's not a nutter.The nutters are the far right wing politicians who ignore climate change ect.
That's what parliamentary priviledge is for, to reveal the truth without fear of being sued.She was proved correct and now a sex pest has to go away. What's wrong with that process?
The sex pest was preaching hypocritically and deserved to be called out in the interest of truth and transperancy.
;)

(some of the contributors writings may be sticking shiny little pins in those who obviously deserved it)
 
Read the original claims detailed by the late Kimberly Kitching, the first person to raise the Higgins "event", and you will realise that pretty swiftly it was pretty common knowledge throughout Parliament.

Apart from the alleged crime itself I think the biggest question is why...............was the alleged crime scene cleaned as a matter of "urgency"?
Why was a special crew called in after hours to"clean" the entire area?
Who

What do you disagree about?
Why are you calling Thorpe a nutter that needs to be sanctioned? Any reason at all? You sound like a sterotyping sky news presenter.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Read the original claims detailed by the late Kimberly Kitching, the first person to raise the Higgins "event", and you will realise that pretty swiftly it was pretty common knowledge throughout Parliament.

Apart from the alleged crime itself I think the biggest question is why...............was the alleged crime scene cleaned as a matter of "urgency"?
Why was a special crew called in after hours to"clean" the entire area?

Tampering with a potential crime scene is a pretty serious call.

Who made the call?

Why?
What the hell does Kimberly Kitching, Pauline Hanson's buddy and coal spruiker have to do with Higgins getting r*ped in parliament house?
 
Why are you calling Thorpe a nutter that needs to be sanctioned? Any reason at all? You sound like a sterotyping sky news presenter.
Unfortunately I may be biased by the evidence.
 
What the hell does Kimberly Kitching, Pauline Hanson's buddy and coal spruiker have to do with Higgins getting r*ped in parliament house?
Maybe you are little behind the times?
Not sure where the insane redheads arsespittle comes into it or Barnaby the adulterer (assuming he is the coal spruiker)?
 
Thorpe has done nothing nutty 😂. Has to be a troll at this point. No one could hold such consistently poor opinions
The right wing troll has arrived. Your side of politics who support coal ,trump and transphobia are the nutters.
You probably shouldn't stereotype and denigrate black women like you've done in the past.
Thorpe has quite correctly protested against transphobe speakers, the NSW police, racists and sex pests.
People with your extreme views are now in the minority , that's why the Liberals keep losing their primary vote.
 
The right wing troll has arrived. Your side of politics who support coal ,trump and transphobia are the nutters.
You probably shouldn't stereotype and denigrate black women like you've done in the past.
Thorpe has quite correctly protested against transphobe speakers, the NSW police, racists and sex pests.
People with your extreme views are now in the minority , that's why the Liberals keep losing their primary vote.
The Liberals had a stronger primary vote count than the Greens at the last federal election, didn't they?
 
Kitching was the coal spruiker.
Thorpe has done nothing nutty unless calling out a pervert is nutty.
Kitching was the member who initiated the entire Higgins debacle.
Brought it to the attention of the Libs in the first place.

You a bit behind the times or just smoking the bone?

Thorpe is sideshow territory.

Bit of a knob head(note non-gender)

Thorp simply drew attention to the idiocy of the Libs half witted and absolutely foundationless attack on Labor and................then
they ( the stupid, moronic and really less than cogniscent Liberal idiots) had to sack another Liberla ****ing halfwit campaigner.

Delicious irony that the human potato almost choked to death on his own words sacking one of his own human trash due to his own inept political tactics.
I hope they campaigners all meet their ends soon at the hands of their dirty campaigner cult saviour.
 
The right wing troll has arrived. Your side of politics who support coal ,trump and transphobia are the nutters.
You probably shouldn't stereotype and denigrate black women like you've done in the past.
Thorpe has quite correctly protested against transphobe speakers, the NSW police, racists and sex pests.
People with your extreme views are now in the minority , that's why the Liberals keep losing their primary vote.
I'd tread carefully when moralising others considering you were happy to overlook gross abuse of power when it suited your ideological agenda.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Vic Lidia Thorpe: Not the subject for every thread!

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top