Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The members won't vote for any of the incumbents, is our view. We've asked our supporters and they clearly want all the boardroom brawlers out and that includes Williams and Power. Leigh Matthews obviously enjoys the strongest support from us and we will be behind him all the way.
The members won't vote for any of the incumbents, is our view. We've asked our supporters and they clearly want all the boardroom brawlers out and that includes Williams and Power. Leigh Matthews obviously enjoys the strongest support from us and we will be behind him all the way.
The form is from the Club and is the same they will send out.
The only way the proxy is for the Chairman is for the box next to it to be ticked. Naturally none of Restore the Lions' Pride supporters will be ticking that box.
This forum is funny but does get a bit troppo sometimes.
The members won't vote for any of the incumbents, is our view. We've asked our supporters and they clearly want all the boardroom brawlers out and that includes Williams and Power. Leigh Matthews obviously enjoys the strongest support from us and we will be behind him all the way.
Henry appears to not be answering any questions todayHenry, as requested by several members, will you be publishing a signed and JP witnessed statutory declaration declaring exactly how you will be voting on each resolution at the EGM?
Would you not agree that members who give you their proxy should receive some sort of assurance as to how it will be used? A stat dec is the most efficient and transparent way to do so.
Henry appears to not be answering any questions today
The form giving the option to give your vote to the chairman of the meeting or <insert name here> is standard operating procedure for AGM/EGM proxy forms and is as per the Constitution.
Nothing dodgy about that.
That and his mailing list.He has 86 followers on Twitter and got a little press early last week, the only place he has a platform is here.
This is starting to get worrying. We need this slimy operator publicly outed or the whole movement is going to be derailed. I have had enough of the Hammo bagging on here because he has been our biggest asset in this whole shemozzle & we need him now to ew\xpose Henry & his alleged organisation for what it is. Or I fear we will go down in flames - exactly what he wants. Status Quo.
Why do people continue to engage with Pinksier on here?
Why do people continue to engage with Pinksier on here?
I loved this bit;The Brisbane Lions’ would like to thanks all of its members that responded to the Club’s annual survey in record numbers.
Edit: Might want to move that to the jumper thread. Got a bit excited.
Yeah, ah, passion coupled with extreme dissatisfaction with the muppets at the helm. Sure respondents love the club, but I reckon the strongest influencing factor for participation in the survey was pure frustrated anger.“To see a record number of respondents demonstrates the passion our members have for our footy club.”
I totally get your point, Gibbo. It gives him air and I hate that.
My issue: What about the guy/girl that gets home from work tonight, scans their email, thinks .. " what's this.. hmm.. this Pinskier guy likes Leigh Matthews.. , .. apparently wants change... current board are knobs.... sounds like a reasonable bloke... ".
If they know little else, many will wander onto BF to see what the prevailing view is on here. If they have to ferret back 10-25-20 pages to find discussion about Dr Pink, they probably won't find it. Bad result if they then go off an post that proxy.
Twitter can help, but BF might be one of the most important circuit-breakers in this mess.