Reading up on the Anti Spam Act 2003 now.
I own a domain name which I use for my email purposes, and the address that I originally received these unsolicited messages at was only ever used for the Brisbane Lions. All other services and businesses get their own address (facebook@domain, linkedin@domain, rah rah).
I unsubscribed that email address earlier this morning, and then sent a reply asking how my address was obtained. This was sent from my personal email address, and referenced the other one.
I got what appears to be the generic four paragraph reply within half an hour, so I responded with several reasons why that would be incorrect, and asked him/them to explain themselves one more time.
I've not had a response yet. Though what I do find interesting is my personal email address just got sent the latest proxy EGM email. I most certainly didn't sign up for that at all, especially not with the address I sent an email asking about the legitimacy of getting my other email address.
If Henry Pinskier is actually on this forum - I'm still awaiting your reply. If I don't get a response in 24 hours, it's being reported to ACMA.
If that's the case, then they shouldn't be sending reply emails that say:
That would still be incorrect, and dishonest. I also find the inclusion of the info about the Collingwood supporters telling them 'where to shove' their cause, it presents as a poor attempt to gather sympathy.
I work in marketing, and the law is very clear on spamming. It is actually illegal to send an unsolicited email. Someone needs to report this, especially if they can prove that they didn't ask to be contacted.