Quality Ruck who can’t get past Darcy. Needed for Depth.
Traded Lloyd Meek - [Traded with F2 (Dogs) to Hawthorn for Jaeger O'Meara and F4]
- Thread starter Joose
- Start date
- Tagged users None
That doesn't equate to a second round pick
Elmer_Hauser
Future Member of Parliament
Yeah does for us as Darcy is injury proned.
Watch Meek come close to winning the Sandover. Moves like a mid and kicks goals. Follow work is fantastic.
We are happy to hold him.
Not for the rest of the AFL
16 game second string backup ruckman do not command rd 2 picks
- Mar 25, 2020
- 2,287
- 6,040
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Absolutely, but a lot of Vic interest and contracted. Overs wouldn't be surprising.
I've no idea what he'll go for, but he's arguably worth more to Freo than the 3rd/F3 that's being touted, and given we'd probably get that next year, it seems odd that we'd lose excellent cover for a year for essentially nothing. Depends what value Belly and co see in it with regards to longer term plans I guess.
It'll get done no doubt. Would love to see him get a regular game and do well (except against us, of course) bright future for sure.
On SM-G955F using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Feb 5, 2018
- 15,532
- 38,475
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Chicago Blackhawks Melb Renegades
And it's being reported today that Freo may have no choice but to accept unders.
A lot to play out.
Dockers fans have two chances of being right (he stays or we pay overs).
Hawthorn fans one (He is traded for 'unders').
If he goes for unders it wont be because we don't have a choice, it will because we choose to let him go (maybe we want to help him out). There are no reports that he is on a lot of money so there is no pressure to trade other than his personal circumstances.
imo he's worth a pick 30-50.
Un-contracted would be more towards 50 but he's contracted and useful depth so more towards 30.
Un-contracted would be more towards 50 but he's contracted and useful depth so more towards 30.
Could also depend on that 3rd being included in another deal for Freo. If they need that pick in like Hawthorn did in the Brad Hill deal then maybe it is more in best interested to get it moving and then slightly unders would suit however I am only thinking out loud who really knows till it happens?
- Feb 5, 2018
- 15,532
- 38,475
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Chicago Blackhawks Melb Renegades
That could easily end up being the case for all we know (re: Helping him out).
Except Freo happy to keep him.
VIC media rarely get Freo news correct, too vic centric.
Freo have already said they’d prefer to keep him. He’s not on big dollars.
50+ is adequate
Ain’t gonna happen.
Weak draft too cmon mate.
Haha nfi.
Maestrovich
Draftee
- Sep 27, 2022
- 5
- 16
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
He’s a backup to us but to hawks would easily be your 1# ruck for the foreseeable future too.Is in contract and has a skill set that’s so widely in demand A pick between 30-40 should do it and hawks will probably still win the deal as he’s shown to be a very good starting ruck when presented with opportunity
Once again he’s contracted and required. CONTRACTED..meaning we decide if he’s traded or not.
You may think he will be there
But he wont want to be there with Jackson coming in, and you have lowballed enough players
Will be at Hawks next year, just not for what you think
No you wont
Similar threads
