Traded Luke Jackson [Traded with #44 and #67 to Fremantle for #13, F1 and F2]

Remove this Banner Ad

No, no one is worth that much. I’m going to be interested to se the difference in trade value between Taranto and Jackson.

Taranto older but much more proven, sounds like he’ll have a longer contract at similar or slightly less money then Jackson

Agreed. Demon fans need to be pushing for Tigers to cough up two firsts for Taranto and not just something happening with Dustin Martin
 
I mean I agree they are not equal. But crikey that is a crazy amount to give up. I reckon Meek alone could get us a early second if we wanted to trade him. He would probably start in close to 10 teams in the afl
Meek is not getting an early second. 3rd rounder at best. Go have a look at other ruck trades over the years for back up rucks.
 
Meek is not getting an early second. 3rd rounder at best. Go have a look at other ruck trades over the years for back up rucks.
Hopefully we hold him then. I would say quite a few clubs have asked the question of meek. So there would be no shortage of clubs. I suppose rucks have never really been traded for much have they.

Out of curiosity have you seen his Wafl stats though? Just today he got 22 Disposals, 6 odd tackles, 29 hit outs and 3 goals. Previous games are great to
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Meek is not getting an early second. 3rd rounder at best. Go have a look at other ruck trades over the years for back up rucks.

Meek is more than a back up ruck. He would be the number one ruck at a host of clubs, Sydney included!

He is basically our Darcy Cameron, and it would take the same type of situation for him to actually take over from Sean Darcy!
 
Meek is not getting an early second. 3rd rounder at best. Go have a look at other ruck trades over the years for back up rucks.
Without looking at every other trade for back up rucks that left to become the main ruck, Meek is contracted at least. Early 2nd is fanciful but I think there's a world where he's worth about pick 30. Maybe I'm optimistic.

Edit" Quick look at Pruess, Pittonet and Witts trades and it seems your correct which is depressing. Some club is going to get an absolute steal there
 
Hopefully we hold him then. I would say quite a few clubs have asked the question of meek. So there would be no shortage of clubs. I suppose rucks have never really been traded for much have they.

Out of curiosity have you seen his Wafl stats though? Just today he got 22 Disposals, 6 odd tackles, 29 hit outs and 3 goals. Previous games are great to
No I haven’t been keeping tabs on his WAFL form. I do t doubt he could be a good AFL ruck. But history shows you won’t get an early second. Third rounder is around the mark.
 
I think you've completely de-valued Jackson here. Melbourne accepting 2 late firsts is a loss for Melbourne. And many dees fans would be disappointed at losing a 20 yr old ruck prospect taken at pick 3 and rising star after only a few seasons. At the start of the season I would've asked for 3 first rounders. His value has diminished so I would reluctantly accept 2. If it's one first rounder, it's pick 2. No different to Cerra.
You seem way over invested though. Yes Melbourne fans are going to be disappointed, but it falls into the stiff bickies category.

You took a risk with a WA boy, WC aren’t interested so you’ll have to take a fair, yet not ridiculous trade from Fremantle.

This is nothing like Cerra. You certainly won’t be getting the equivalent of the pick 3 you originally paid back. Freos first, maybe a second as well with you guys giving a third is more than enough.
 
You seem way over invested though. Yes Melbourne fans are going to be disappointed, but it falls into the stiff bickies category.

You took a risk with a WA boy, WC aren’t interested so you’ll have to take a fair, yet not ridiculous trade from Fremantle.

This is nothing like Cerra. You certainly won’t be getting the equivalent of the pick 3 you originally paid back. Freos first, maybe a second as well with you guys giving a third is more than enough.
how is it nothing like Cerra? it's exactly the same.
 
Most Fremantle posters will hate this but it should 2022 first round, 2023 first round, Pick 28 Acres trade, and Meek for stake knives.

Hard pass. Big fan of Meek who's starting to put everything together (like traditional ruckmen tend to do) and is unusually clean at his feet for a player his size. Big fear he'll be leaving next season for more opportunities since he's stuck behind Darcy and has all the tools of being a bargain pickup for a gun ruck.

More importantly Luke Jackson, what does he bring to Freo that justifies that cost? Undersized, super athletic ruck that arguably looks better playing in the the best team of the past two years.

For that price (both salary and trading) he'll need to fill some of the following:
  • No.1 Ruck (Not needed, unless Darcy somehow turns into a fulltime Full Forward...)
  • Play Lobb's role for the next 8-10 years (Give him the benefit of time but I've yet to seem him look anywhere near threat beyond drifting is a forward mismatch)
  • Develops the ability to play CHB like a Cameron or Blicavs

I would rather Freo keep their picks and keep drafting. We're a gun small forward away from a potent forward line of Amiss/Treacy/Sturt/Schultz/Fredricks combo and our mid/backline depth is fantastic. Looking forward to seeing how Jackson goes as Melbourne's No.1 in a few years though :thumbsu:
 
No he wasn’t, as a 20 year old Darcy played 7 games. Averaged 9 disposals, 2 marks, 0.57 contested marks. He averaged more hitouts as he was playing number one ruck while Jackson is number 2. But Jackson as an overall player was miles ahead.

Darcy didn’t get even get a rising star nomination, Jackson won the award.

He played 11 games in 2019, he got injured or he would of played more. What year were you comparing too?

Darcy turned 21 in 2019, just as Jackson will do this year. Or you comparing the year Darcy turned 20 to the year Jackson turns 21?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't mind giving up our two first rounders for Jackson, but are we allowed to go into the draft without a single selection?
 
He played 11 games in 2019, he got injured or he would of played more. What year were you comparing too?

Darcy turned 21 in 2019, just as Jackson will do this year. Or you comparing the year Darcy turned 20 to the year Jackson turns 21?
Jackson plays this entire season as a 20 year old but let’s compare their compare their 3rd seasons.

11 games from Darcy: 11.09 disposals, 1.82 marks, 0.45 contested marks

Jackson 20 games: 14:35 disposals, 3.15 marks, 1.25 contested. (These stats are actually ahead of Darcy this year)

Sure Darcy had the hitout numbers (not playing behind the Aus ruckman like Jackson is) but as an overall player Jackson is well ahead of Sean Darcy at the same age.

Like I said, Jackson won the Rising star, Darcy didn’t even get a nomination.
 
over pay? Melbourne drafted him at pick 3. Why use pick 3 on him if Melbourne are already set?

Answer is because he’s a gun player, and he’s justified it by winning the rising star. Gun players don’t grow in trees, that’s why you pay for them.

Not saying he is but some ordinary players have won the rising star. Including the Lions Lewis Taylor
 
Why is the comparison being made with Sean Darcy at all? Sean Darcy is a primary ruck, Luke Jackson is a forward who fills in in the ruck.

He should be being compared to Mitch Georgiades. But even he doesn't fill in the ruck.
 
Jackson plays this entire season as a 20 year old but let’s compare their compare their 3rd seasons.

11 games from Darcy: 11.09 disposals, 1.82 marks, 0.45 contested marks

Jackson 20 games: 14:35 disposals, 3.15 marks, 1.25 contested. (These stats are actually ahead of Darcy this year)

Sure Darcy had the hitout numbers (not playing behind the Aus ruckman like Jackson is) but as an overall player Jackson is well ahead of Sean Darcy at the same age.

Like I said, Jackson won the Rising star, Darcy didn’t even get a nomination.

Darcy turned 21 in June that year. Jackson turns 21 in September this year. It’s the comparable season. They are 3 months apart in age comparing that season.

Darcy 0.4 goals a game while playing mainly ruck. Jackson 0.5 goals while playing predominantly forward.

Darcy, more clearances, more 1%, more rebound 50s (probably because he was in the ruck), and a crap load more hitouts 27 vs. 11. Slightly less disposals, slightly less contested possessions. Less tackles.

It sort of proves Darcy was performing at the same level as Jackson is now at the same age. Darcy more of a traditional ruckman, Jackson roaming around and joining in link up play, and doing what Jackson does as a part time ruck.
 
Darcy turned 21 in June that year. Jackson turns 21 in September this year. It’s the comparable season. They are 3 months apart in age comparing that season.

Darcy 0.4 goals a game while playing mainly ruck. Jackson 0.5 goals while playing predominantly forward.

Darcy, more clearances, more 1%, more rebound 50s (probably because he was in the ruck), and a crap load more hitouts 27 vs. 11. Slightly less disposals, slightly less contested possessions. Less tackles.

It sort of proves Darcy was performing at the same level as Jackson is now at the same age. Darcy more of a traditional ruckman, Jackson roaming around and joining in link up play, and doing what Jackson does as a part time ruck.
Less disposals, less contested possessions, only just more clearances, and as you said probably because he was in the ruck. Imagine how many clearances and disposals Jackson would get if was in the midfield majority of the game. When Jackson goes into the ruck his impact is far ahead of where Darcy was in his 3rd season.
 
Hopefully we hold him then. I would say quite a few clubs have asked the question of meek. So there would be no shortage of clubs. I suppose rucks have never really been traded for much have they.

Out of curiosity have you seen his Wafl stats though? Just today he got 22 Disposals, 6 odd tackles, 29 hit outs and 3 goals. Previous games are great to
Meek is over-rated by Freo fans. Sure he dominated his opposing WAFL ruck around the ground showing off his great tank, agility and clearance work for a 1st ruck. Kicked three snags too.

Meanwhile he lost the hitouts by three to his no-name opponent.

He does everything well except actually rucking. He's not a no. 1 AFL ruck.
 
Less disposals, less contested possessions, only just more clearances, and as you said probably because he was in the ruck. Imagine how many clearances and disposals Jackson would get if was in the midfield majority of the game. When Jackson goes into the ruck his impact is far ahead of where Darcy was in his 3rd season.

This conversation started because you said Jackson was miles ahead of X,Y,Z ruckman and included Darcy. I stated that Darcy was ahead, but comparing the years they turned 21, I concede that Jackson has better stats around the ground but Darcy is ahead in clearances and hitouts. I think they had equally impactful 3rd years in the afl. Perhaps your perception that Jackson outperformed all other ruckman is incorrect.

Darcy’s 4th year is again injury interrupted but his 5th year results in a BnF and all Australian squad selection. I wonder if Jackson will win a BnF by 2024, though competing with Petracca, it might be a better measure to see if he makes AA squad. Only time will tell.
 
Meek is over-rated by Freo fans. Sure he dominated his opposing WAFL ruck around the ground showing off his great tank, agility and clearance work for a 1st ruck. Kicked three snags too.

Meanwhile he lost the hitouts by three to his no-name opponent.

He does everything well except actually rucking. He's not a no. 1 AFL ruck.
Funny because you could probably apply this post to Jackson lol, does everything well except rucking
 
This conversation started because you said Jackson was miles ahead of X,Y,Z ruckman and included Darcy. I stated that Darcy was ahead, but comparing the years they turned 21, I concede that Jackson has better stats around the ground but Darcy is ahead in clearances and hitouts. I think they had equally impactful 3rd years in the afl. Perhaps your perception that Jackson outperformed all other ruckman is incorrect.

Darcy’s 4th year is again injury interrupted but his 5th year results in a BnF and all Australian squad selection. I wonder if Jackson will win a BnF by 2024, though competing with Petracca, it might be a better measure to see if he makes AA squad. Only time will tell.
Of course Darcy is ahead in clearances 2.8 to Jackson 2.4 because Darcy was always in the ruck. Give Jackson the amount of ruck time Darcy was getting and he’s averaging 4.5 clearances. When Jackson goes into the ruck he is a much more impactful player than Darcy in his 3rd year.

No doubt Darcy during his 5th year was amazing, I’d had him the 2nd best ruck in the league behind Gawn that year.

But those ruckman I mentioned earlier were not as impactful as Jackson at the same stage of their careers.

Earlier this year (not that I agreed) people were already calling Jackson a top 2-3 ruck in the league. No one had Darcy near the top 3 during his 3rd year.

71510E2B-38E6-4470-B569-5240101B5534.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Traded Luke Jackson [Traded with #44 and #67 to Fremantle for #13, F1 and F2]

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top