Malthouse did that though. Thats my point.
Malthouse was their list manager as well as coach?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Malthouse did that though. Thats my point.
Malthouse was their list manager as well as coach?
Malthouse was their list manager as well as coach?
LOL at people trying to say the media got Mick sacked. The fact is Mick Malthouse got Mick Malthouse sacked. (with some help from a pitifully pea-hearted playing group)
I almost feel in the end that MM wanted to be sacked (and get a pay out) rather than walk on his own volition.. he was never going to walk, but new he was doomed and was baiting,tempting and pushing the board with his comments to make the call.
Thomas was obviously all Malthouse.
Meanwhile the recruiting of Dick, Jones, Tutt, Jaksch/Whiley, Boekhorst, and Fields also have the hallmarks of a coach looking for a quick fix. And those selections were all made in 2014 alone.
The club was in full "wallpaper over the cracks" mode, and I'd be very surprised if Malthouse and his hand-picked lieutenants weren't the driving force behind it.
I have some news for you . Eddie is not the sun, nor is Collingwood (Smith St is neat though).
But who else would Mick get to have a kick with before the game if not Daisy?Let me count the ways Malthouse was a mistake
Not sure many coaches would have overpaid for Dale Thomas, for one.
But who else would Mick get to have a kick with before the game if not Daisy?
I almost feel in the end that MM wanted to be sacked (and get a pay out) rather than walk on his own volition.. he was never going to walk, but new he was doomed and was baiting,tempting and pushing the board with his comments to make the call.
Mick got what he wanted .. a coaching record an out clause and a pay out bonus
the board got what they wanted ..but at an expense !!
everyone got the result they wanted ...but just cost some more than others
I hope it works out for the Blues...this time
but honestly every time I watched a MM presser or interview.. I thought thank f#@k he doesn't catch the team I support!!
I posted similar elsewhere, and I believe you're 100% right.
Malthouse liked to talk about how he'd never walk away from a job, wouldn't quit, wouldn't back down from the challenge. He technically kept his word by getting himself sacked, but the truth is he effectively quit.
He could have knuckled down, tweaked his gameplan, encouraged his team to take the game on, and gone into the bye round with a competitive showing vs Sydney and maybe even a win over Adelaide if he'd motivated his troops properly. It would have been enough to get him to the end of the year and buy him time to prove he's the right man for the job.
In my opinion he didn't back himself to be able to do that, to turn the situation around and reverse the rot. So he ran to the media to get himself sacked.
I never implied that he was rubbish - he was an exceptional coach. But he was great at sniffing the wind and moving onto the next challenge in order to protect his coaching legacy - had he stayed at the Dogs or WC much longer (both of whom were on the slide) he most likely would have joined the sacked coaches club earlier than 2015. And his resignation hand was forced at Collingwood.to suggest Mick is a has been or imply he is rubbish is beyond silly.
I never implied that he was rubbish - he was an exceptional coach. But he was great at sniffing the wind and moving onto the next challenge in order to protect his coaching legacy - had he stayed at the Dogs or WC much longer (both of whom were on the slide) he most likely would have joined the sacked coaches club earlier than 2015. And his resignation hand was forced at Collingwood.
Daisy got a great contract with Carlton, so I'd say he doesn't really care who he kicks the ball around with, if at all!The bigger question is how is daisy going to get a kick now?
The bigger question is how is daisy going to get a kick now?
What does pushing up Daisy's really mean in his contract?apparently Daisy's contract has a bonus component for stats and his pre match kicks are included in this.
So are you surprised...................this is the AFL!Malthouse has done a complete backflip on his Trigg/Betts story today.
So are you surprised...................this is the AFL!
Yes I'm serious as there is always a hint of the truth, especially when the AFL has to get involved. The wily old coot knew what he was doing.
Adds to the drama though........Some one must have had a whisper in his ear.He knew what he was doing alright. But the total about face so soon after was pretty cringe worthy.
Egon Zhander recommended Trigg - who are you?