Why are they even trotting Fog out.This shows that the club knows it is in trouble so are messaging is being scripted. Fogarty has used the same words on 5AA.
The poor guy puts up with enough garbage on game day
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why are they even trotting Fog out.This shows that the club knows it is in trouble so are messaging is being scripted. Fogarty has used the same words on 5AA.
How many times have you heard Nicks say "our F50 entries weren't deep enough" when we are getting beaten?Took a screenshot of analysis of Crows' forward entries 'wastefulness'.
This says a lot about how our blokes are coached and their decision-making:
Not sure who has the ball at the pointy end of that shadow, but he has options:
1) handball to player close in front of him (not great, oppo close)
2) kick to bloke on lead, in the clear. A good pass will find him 40m out in front.
3) kick/handball to his R to Crow just above Kornes' notepad (too indirect)
4) kick deep to Tex (closest to goal) who will be manned-up by the time the ball gets there.
View attachment 1947137
Clearly, 2) is the best option, but our bloke goes for 4) .
Sorry if this has been posted, but the options and entries (high-bombs or shat-kicks) are shown clearly in here, and they expose the Crows to be terrible:
'Confronting' vision exposes wasteful Crows
Footage on The Round So Far shows how Adelaide misfired when entering forward 50 against Geelongwww.afl.com.au
The Pedlar one is the worst, but Dawson (our previously best kick/deliverer) misses TWO great chances to set up goals.
Often, the Crows are not looking for a mate on a lead, but if they are, they do not trust their mate to get the job done and choose the worst option to kick to.
That's on Nicks.
Why are they even trotting Fog out.
The poor guy puts up with enough garbage on game day
Ah, yes, forgot about our fabled leadership group.He is part of the leadership group.
Ah, yes, forgot about our fabled leadership group.
basically said if the Crows score more points then the opposition then thats going to go a long way towards winning the football match.
Nicks will be sacked this year imo. The afc only cares about money. Once the crowds drop off and young talent threaten to leave, even the bunch of incompetents running the club will act very swiftly. They have plenty of bean counters down there to work out the cost of keeping Nicks is far greater than the cost of getting rid of him. He hasn't met any performance targets so he will likely only receive a 6 month payout which is more than that bum deserves.The Adelaide Football Club is effectively in a holding pattern till at least 2027 maybe longer when/if we get a new coach.
By then we may realistically may have to engage in a 2nd rebuild. This is severely exacerbated by the entry of Tasmania, not too dissimilar of the time when we went through a rebuild with the Suns entering the competition.
To be honest, not often. I've stopped paying attention to what Nicks says. It just makes me more frustrated.How many times have you heard Nicks say "our F50 entries weren't deep enough" when we are getting beaten?
Here's the Pedlar howler. In this shot, Pedlar has the ball, with Tex all ready 5m clear of his opponent and the rest of the F50 is a paddock.Of course we aren't going to hit up leading players 40 out, it goes against everything we aspire too and people wonder why Fog is floundering this year, he's the one you should be hitting up t that range
"If"?If Nicks continuea to put both crouch and laird in the middle it proves he doesn't get it.
Anyone else of the opinion that the club giving Nicks an extension when they did has actually increased the pressure and expectation on him?
It feels like it's actually had the complete opposite affect that they were hoping it was going to have.
Drier than an over-oaked Chardonnay.It’s still better than the alternative; finding yourself 0-5 (or worse) and trying to find a good time to announce you already re-signed him in preseason
That would've been one of the funniest things to ever happen to this club if they had to spin re-signing Nicks after a 0-billionty start as a positive. They've deprived me of some quality cringe, the bastards.It’s still better than the alternative; finding yourself 0-5 (or worse) and trying to find a good time to announce you already re-signed him in preseason
We have one. His name is Jake Soligo. He's the perfect compliment to Crouch right now.You need speedy and dynamic mid to compliment what you already have. A Gulden, Butters, or Serong would do nicely.
We have them, but unfortunately they don’t get used, the development of our younger players is poor, we suck the natural talent out of themA neutral come in peace.
Nicksy was my fav player at the Swans. He started off as a dashing half back who would accurately kick to I50. He was also a true gentleman off the field.
Rocket Eade put Nicksy at HF after a season where he was arguably one of our best players. Nicksy wasn't the most consistent goal kicker, bit like the current Crows, so it was baffling. In hindsight, he began to lose his pace as he was losing his golden locks, many injuries took toll.
He was a product of the gutsy, not as skilled, and flooding Swans of the 90s. He would not shy away from getting into the trenches to lock the ball up, etc.
The reason why I'm reminiscing is that I think Nicks has created a team in reflection of his own playing image - hard, honest footballers who lack the skillset and creativity relative to the competition. Adelaide midfield is just... vanilla. Last year was an outlier imo.
But to be fair, a coach can only go so far with the cattle he has. Your list management surely has a lot more to answer for. You need speedy and dynamic mid to compliment what you already have. A Gulden, Butters, or Serong would do nicely.
I don't pretend to know the Crows more than you guys but surely they need more help. Put Rankine ng/Raschele to enhance the combination.We have one. His name is Jake Soligo. He's the perfect compliment to Crouch right now.
Strangely enough we had picks to take those players. I know we did for Butters and Serong. Ogilvie our head recruiter has a knack of messing up ever decent pick we have along with Roo and Reid who mismanage our list at every opportunity. Nicks doesnt have the list we should have but he is clearly incompetent and no better than a sanfl, wafl, neafl coach at best. He must go along with Roo, Reid, Ogilvie, Burns, Van Berlo, Godden, Kelly, Olsen, the entire board. Our only competent staff member seems to be Burgess. Supporters have had 25 years of this shit and it's worn real thin. The problem is that no one with enough power wants to change the status quo. The club exists to keep incompetent people in positions they are not fit to be in.A neutral come in peace.
Nicksy was my fav player at the Swans. He started off as a dashing half back who would accurately kick to I50. He was also a true gentleman off the field.
Rocket Eade put Nicksy at HF after a season where he was arguably one of our best players. Nicksy wasn't the most consistent goal kicker, bit like the current Crows, so it was baffling. In hindsight, he began to lose his pace as he was losing his golden locks, many injuries took toll.
He was a product of the gutsy, not as skilled, and flooding Swans of the 90s. He would not shy away from getting into the trenches to lock the ball up, etc.
The reason why I'm reminiscing is that I think Nicks has created a team in reflection of his own playing image - hard, honest footballers who lack the skillset and creativity relative to the competition. Adelaide midfield is just... vanilla. Last year was an outlier imo.
But to be fair, a coach can only go so far with the cattle he has. Your list management surely has a lot more to answer for. You need speedy and dynamic mid to compliment what you already have. A Gulden, Butters, or Serong would do nicely.
Fair enough.Strangely enough we had picks to take those players. I know we did for Butters and Serong. Ogilvie our head recruiter has a knack of messing up ever decent pick we have along with Roo and Reid whomismanage our list at every opportunity. Nicks doesnt have the list we should have but he is clearly incompetent and no better than a sanfl, wafl, neafl coach at best. He mist go along with Roo, Reid, Ogilvie, Burns, Van Berlo, Kelly, Olsen, the entire board. Our only competent staff member seems to be Burgess.
I think Rachelle Rankine Pedlar and co were told pre season to expect more time in the midfield, what has happened Nicks and co didn’t expect what is being dished up and have S** t the bed and now the young guys have become a bit disheartened from not getting that timeI don't pretend to know the Crows more than you guys but surely they need more help. Put Rankine ng/Raschele to enhance the combination.
A neutral come in peace.
Nicksy was my fav player at the Swans. He started off as a dashing half back who would accurately kick to I50. He was also a true gentleman off the field.
Rocket Eade put Nicksy at HF after a season where he was arguably one of our best players. Nicksy wasn't the most consistent goal kicker, bit like the current Crows, so it was baffling. In hindsight, he began to lose his pace as he was losing his golden locks, many injuries took toll.
He was a product of the gutsy, not as skilled, and flooding Swans of the 90s. He would not shy away from getting into the trenches to lock the ball up, etc.
The reason why I'm reminiscing is that I think Nicks has created a team in reflection of his own playing image - hard, honest footballers who lack the skillset and creativity relative to the competition. Adelaide midfield is just... vanilla. Last year was an outlier imo.
But to be fair, a coach can only go so far with the cattle he has. Your list management surely has a lot more to answer for. You need speedy and dynamic mid to compliment what you already have. A Gulden, Butters, or Serong would do nicely.
That’s not it at all. He’s saying you get more bang for your buck against the Crows by sacrificing attack in favour of defence. So expect ugly football when the Crows are playing.
In other words, you’re more likely to beat the Crows scoring 75 points than you are 110. Because the latter becomes a shootout, which plays into Adelaide’s hands. You’ll lose 110-130 instead of winning 75-50.
It was a very simple yet salient point he was making, and it went completely over Bickley’s head. And yours.
I think just about all of us want to see more of Rachele in there - it just isn't happening (2 centre bounce attendances in 3 games this season). Pedlar would be a nice injection too.I don't pretend to know the Crows more than you guys but surely they need more help. Put Rankine ng/Raschele to enhance the combination.
Why are they even trotting Fog out.
The poor guy puts up with enough garbage on game day
I think just about all of us want to see more of Rachele in there - it just isn't happening (2 centre bounce attendances in 3 games this season). Pedlar would be a nice injection too.