Wasn't he Hawks? Nathan Thompson was the roo i'm pretty sure.Jonathan Hay is the player you are referring to, I think.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wasn't he Hawks? Nathan Thompson was the roo i'm pretty sure.Jonathan Hay is the player you are referring to, I think.
It's been like that for a very long time, supporters don't care. People know that there is palm oil in the food they buy, they still buy it.your passion for a particular team is really just buying into the sports entertainment industry.
Both Hay and Thompson went from Hawthorn to North.Wasn't he Hawks? Nathan Thompson was the roo i'm pretty sure.
Hmmm i wonder. The Bennel trade was what 48 hrs in?Before we got Bennell, Freo offered those 2 1st round picks. Again that was fair compo.
Hmmm i wonder. The Bennel trade was what 48 hrs in?
But on that, A few of your freo supporter mates are saying no trade was offered.
So which is it?
When the answer is "he is a required player and will not be traded", then you move on to the next trade
So you gave a small offer and then 48 hrs said "nah the offer is off the table?"When the answer is "he is a required player and will not be traded", then you move on to the next trade, get it done, and come back later. Gubby and the Goof Troop did not want to trade Cam, and that's their right. They knew he had issues and again, it was their right to do nothing. However, the consequences of this may be far reaching in that any player with a tiny bit of doubt in their mind will no longer sign on long term before their current contracts expire. The fact that they did not change their plan of attack during trade week just screams indecision.
If they knew he had a problem (and they claim they did), then surely they should have looked after player welfare (they backed themselves in, yes, but they've never had the runs on the board in this department). Now they are saying that Cam should not be playing any football this year anyway - a good get out clause for themselves. But this is probably just their opinion. They don't seem to have a clue.
Let alone boyd.That's why Aish, Treloar, Anderson, etc. all stayed put.
Maybe next Freo can reconsider their offer rather than stamping their feet in protest and spending their big picks on a guy with serious attitude issues.
Would expect players to lose weight as the preseason begins. The 9kg is perhaps 4 or 5 in reality.
Let alone boyd.
Absolutely. Despite the crap we give some doggies fans Boyd will be a gun. Just take time.True. But we are YEARS away from knowing if that was a good or bad trade.
It's baffling that Freo, who are in desperate need for a long term KPF solution wouldn't give up a decent but not top tier 23-27 y.o. player in a straight swap. If anyone has failed from a list management perspective it's the Dockers.
Says you! Cats offered similar than that for a far superior player to Sunshine. You need to get a grip. Massive overs for an unproven forward. Sure, he is under contract but doesn't make that much of a diference. Pick 9 and 28 is 2146. Minus pick 50 you got back leaves you coughing up 1873 points for Danger. If they coughed up pick 22 and lets say pick 19 next year, thats equivalent to 1793 points. 80 points short of Danger value on points. Keep trolling, Motley.
For a young skinny developing KPF you'd expect weight gain, not loss.Would expect players to lose weight as the preseason begins. The 9kg is perhaps 4 or 5 in reality.
It's not baffling at all. A "decent" player is not what GWS wanted. For all the people pontificating about how Freo stuffed up and could have easily got it done, I'm still yet to see anyone propose an actual (and reasonable) trade which we should have done.
Would expect players to lose weight as the preseason begins. The 9kg is perhaps 4 or 5 in reality.
It's a joke to suggest that Freo didn't have the players to get a trade done. Crozier, Suban, Pearce, Sheridan, Mzungu and, yes, even Barlow are all non-essential personnel that could have been packaged to get the deal done. Other clubs do it all the time.
Instead, Freo cut their noses off to spite their faces and are staring down the barrel of a 2017 with spuds like Tabener as your KPF and Zac Clarke as your ruckman (lol).
It's a joke to suggest that Freo didn't have the players to get a trade done. Crozier, Suban, Pearce, Sheridan, Mzungu and, yes, even Barlow are all non-essential personnel that could have been packaged to get the deal done. Other clubs do it all the time.
Instead, Freo cut their noses off to spite their faces and are staring down the barrel of a 2017 with spuds like Tabener as your KPF and Zac Clarke as your ruckman (lol).
So you gave a small offer and then 48 hrs said "nah the offer is off the table?"
Good to see you guys were serious.
But as i said. There are quite a few freo boys and girls who say no offer was made.
So which is it?
An offer was made or none were. You guys need to get on the same page.
If you hadnt noticed. No one has any idea. The kid seems to be not well at all. Hense the time off.
Edit. Dang it you got me to come into the thread again.
Carlton only need one of them to turn out to be a reasonable player to have done well from the deal. Its not like they traded much.
So how did he suddenly lose 9 kilos? Its the pre-season. The players would be getting weighed and body fat checked every day or 2. Hard to see how this suddenly became a thing.
In fact Freo never made that offer. Colin Young assumed in the media that it would be the offer that would get the job done.
So either he was told by Freo that would be the offer or he made that assumption on his own. Freo traded for Bennell early in the piece so i find it hard to think they had any intention of using it.
Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk
I completely disagree with this. If he was so desperate to get out of there he shouldn't have signed a 3 year deal to stay. GWS have done nothing but held their player accountable for something he wanted to do.
In a word, yes!
The facts make a liar of you.
He signed an extension of his contract 5 months after being drafted and before he played a game. He extended for 3 years not 2, so again you are making factually incorrect comments. He extended more than 18 months prior to requesting a trade for personal reasons.
While you go about looking up facts and not invective, look up duty of care towards employees. Thats binding on the club as well.
Now deal with the health issues and stop pretending they don't exist. Even GWS has stopped that pretence. Losing 9 kg in 8 weeks is a pointer to serious issue, so maybe put that into the equation. You can poonce on about contracts all you when the guy is healthy enough to fulfill the contract. You might also want to consider the obligations go two ways. Its not slavery we have here.