News Media Thread, 2024: Insightful, Inciteful and Incomptent

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

If Schofield is taking directions from Tommy B then fair to say he's staying then, Schoeys been off this Hawks deal for weeks and saying the club should just keep Barrass.
Havent listened to schoey much lately, but if thats true then yeah I reckon the Hawks have cooled on Barrass, as evident by their offer.
They probably asked about Barrass and Battle, committed to both while really only wanting one of them.
They wont say theyre not interested anymore because that would give them a bad rep.
 
Havent listened to schoey much lately, but if thats true then yeah I reckon the Hawks have cooled on Barrass, as evident by their offer.
They probably asked about Barrass and Battle, committed to both while really only wanting one of them.
They wont say theyre not interested anymore because that would give them a bad rep.

Earlier in the year seemed a bit prickly with the club about it all, now hes sounding like he'd not blame the club at all if they don't deal with Hawthorn.

The parts I've listened to he's said WC should play hardball and get as much out of Hawthorn as they can. And if the Hawks aren't willing to pay, they should deal with someone else
 
If Schofield is taking directions from Tommy B then fair to say he's staying then, Schoeys been off this Hawks deal for weeks and saying the club should just keep Barrass.

That's a stretch. He's been pushing that we should ask for 2 x F1 and a F2 akin to the TK deal. Which is just... Insane. Real Cornes areas and purposely so.
 
Earlier in the year seemed a bit prickly with the club about it all, now hes sounding like he'd not blame the club at all if they don't deal with Hawthorn.

The parts I've listened to he's said WC should play hardball and get as much out of Hawthorn as they can. And if the Hawks aren't willing to pay, they should deal with someone else

Yep I remember only a few weeks ago him saying we would only get a first rounder if we were lucky and we’d just have to take it because barrass was gone.

Now he’s saying we should just keep him if we don’t get way overs. Almost sounds like he and barrass have had a tiff, Not something I would want my mate saying in the media when I desperately wanted a trade😂
 
Havent listened to schoey much lately, but if thats true then yeah I reckon the Hawks have cooled on Barrass, as evident by their offer.
They probably asked about Barrass and Battle, committed to both while really only wanting one of them.
They wont say theyre not interested anymore because that would give them a bad rep.
the truth will come out.
 
Yes it is. Big difference between being contracted for 3 years as a 22 year old and a 29 year old.
Theres no "not sure" emoji. So went with the more dramatic "disagree", then softened with a "sad".

I still think what the whorks initially offered was way unders for a player like barrass. Hes still in his prime, which is reflected in the value and duration of the contract that was put infront of him.

I think asking for 2 firsts is justified. Keeping in mind these will be picks in the high teens in a compromised draft.
 
Theres no "not sure" emoji. So went with the more dramatic "disagree", then softened with a "sad".

I still think what the whorks initially offered was way unders for a player like barrass. Hes still in his prime, which is reflected in the value and duration of the contract that was put infront of him.

I think asking for 2 firsts is justified. Keeping in mind these will be picks in the high teens in a compromised draft.

I'm with you there mate. 2 x F1, particularly given Hawks current F1 in a sexy draft has been removed. Kicks our rebuild down the road and into the unknown having to trade futures. But Schoey is saying 2 x F1 and their F2 (and this was before they traded away 14) - we send nothing back but TB, and if we don't get that deal then we don't send him. That's just too far overs given TB is a nice to have but we have one eye on some juicy picks.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Duffield a bit of a negative Nancy on the eagles due to the hawks split. SEN VFL mouthpiece now?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com


Which is funny because he was the one at the start saying that the eagles shouldn’t accept anything but way overs for him. 2 first rounders minimum he was saying at the start.
 
For years, we have paid slight overs and taken slight unders to get trade deals done.

With the limited assets we have, we just can't afford to take this approach this year.

We have good relationships with a number of clubs. I am sure if Baker played for Sydney or the Western Bulldogs the deal would have already been done.
 


Carlton coming hard for pick 3 with the same absolute shithouse offer that was rejected already

Not sure what Cals definition of "coming hard" is but I'm betting his Mrs is disappointed

Sad Please Please Please GIF by myHQ
 

Remove this Banner Ad

News Media Thread, 2024: Insightful, Inciteful and Incomptent

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top