Player Watch Mid-Season Pick #11 (2023) - Quinton Narkle

[Malibu#27]

Latest news:

Matt Turner reporting we are delisting Narkle and he will head to a third club in the SSP.

 

[morell]

Wouldn't be at the top of my list for delisting

I get contract timing and all that but would have

McEntee
Evans
Atkins

All well below him and quite a few more at least on par

Played 11 games including the preliminary in a side that finished second. Atkins.....

Felt he played the sub role reasonably well. Won the game for us v Melbourne.

Should consider himself very unlucky and the clubs disastrous trade period claims another victim

 

[Coobk001]

Wouldn't be at the top of my list for delisting

I get contract timing and all that but would have

McEntee
Evans
Atkins

It's a scenario that happens all the time though.

Woodcock should've been delisted after McEntee was, a few years back, but he was the one out of contract.

There's no way Atkins and McEntee are delisted under contract, so whilst Narkle might go, Evans will probably also go.

 

[PortPortPort]

Never thought much of Narkle. Some of our supporters overrated him, I think they liked the idea of him. If he goes, he goes.

 

[Schulzenfest]

Wouldn't be at the top of my list for delisting

I get contract timing and all that but would have

McEntee
Evans
Atkins

All well below him and quite a few more at least on par

Played 11 games including the preliminary in a side that finished second. Atkins.....

Felt he played the sub role reasonably well. Won the game for us v Melbourne.

Should consider himself very unlucky and the clubs disastrous trade period claims another victim

Sounds like we got pick 29 thrown into the deal as a result of taking Atkins. I'd rather have Narkle than Atkins but I'd rather have Atkins and pick 29 than Narkle.

 

[Port 2004]

It's a scenario that happens all the time though.

Woodcock should've been delisted after McEntee was, a few years back, but he was the one out of contract.

There's no way Atkins and McEntee are delisted under contract, so whilst Narkle might go, Evans will probably also go.

Yep, it is one thing to have depth players but it is another to carry too many spuds.

 

[PowerLil]

Of all the players who are out of contract and to be delisted, letting Scully go is the one that will irritate me the most.

Agree. We should not be delisting Scully under any circumstances.

 

[Watto71]

Narkle Evans and Mac n cheese can all go
SPP is back Richards is in
Play the kids for the 3rd spot

 

[1954]

Agree. We should not be delisting Scully under any circumstances.

Absolutely, but delisting a 203 cm 19 yo key forward who can take a pack mark, is one of the better kicks for goal on the list, and replacing him with just another sub 180 cm lightly framed flanker is what we do.

 

[jackag24]

Narkle Evans and Mac n cheese can all go
SPP is back Richards is in
Play the kids for the 3rd spot

Yep agree.

Going by the recruitment of Richards, i think he's a walk up start in the best 22

The next smalls in-line are Anamegapopolis and Charleson.

 

[bomberclifford]

I'll miss his luscious hair.

 

[JimmyBC]

F. Evans & McEntee are far worse footballers.. see you at the footy

 

[morell]

Sounds like we got pick 29 thrown into the deal as a result of taking Atkins. I'd rather have Narkle than Atkins but I'd rather have Atkins and pick 29 than Narkle.

Agree.

But it's a bit like preferring to be stabbed than shot

 

[DaTBird187]

I'll miss his luscious hair.

He's the greatest blonde aboriginal we've ever had at Port.

 

[Shaucob_Burjan]

Just pay out McEntee and delist farken.

We have the salary cap for it

 

[dirty2]

Scully in my opinion did ok as a forward in a shit team. I would give 1 year deal and have a quiet word with the kid.. about what's expected if he wants an AFL career.