Mike Sheahans End Of Season Top 50 Players

Remove this Banner Ad

Example:

Matty Scarlett at #33 based on 2010. Who is Mike kidding?

He omits N.Reiwolt because he only played 15 games. Yet Scarlett only played 18 and none of them were anywhere near as good as about 5 or 6 of the games N.Reiwolt produced.

Scarlett is in there for past deeds, nothing surer. Mike is not consistent with his methodology if Scarlett can make it and N.Reiwolt can't, Scarlett was below average this year.

Scarlett's there as he is the best defender in one of the best defences in the league. For the record, how many goals did he concede this year? 15? 20? Did he get shown up in any of the finals? Kosi didn't get a touch after quarter time in the first, he was just about our best in the second and was one of only 3 or 4 decent players in the prelim.
 
He isn't one of your grunts. He doesn't turn games against the very best teams off his own boot. He doesn't do the Ablett type stuff or even the Judd type stuff. He is best outside where he can have time to execute his skills. You can classify him any way you want with stats, but the scraggers dont use him to turn games when the game is there to be won, they use him to finish the inside work of others. Not a criticism, just plainly what he is there to do. We have similar type players.

He does more grunt work than any other one of our midfielders. You actually have no idea. Has turned a game many a time for us this year through his core strength in packs. His best and fairest win should indicate just how much the coaches rate his work when we turn to him.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Its no good being pretty when the pressure is off, its all about being effective in the crunch games at the critical moments. he is an outside player, that's cool, every club needs them, but he needs to kick goals that create momentum, not just goals that make him look better then the rest of his team.

As has already been stated. Look at the contetx of the game. When a team is getting smashed, as we were, you have to do anything to try and create opportunity. And to make it more intense, it was a finals game. When the pressure is so high, as collingwood puts on, and when it is a final, you sometimes have to just try and create opportunity. Which is what Griffen tried to do.
As for your comment about his goals, have you seen the goals he kicks? They are often in good passages of play from the team, and sometimes with his damaging runs through the lines. Everything he does gains momentum for us. He never goes for snap goals that look awesome. He always gets them on the run from around 50m-60m. I can remember 1 flashy goal he has kicked, and that was against Freo this year.
 
Scarlett's there as he is the best defender in one of the best defences in the league. For the record, how many goals did he concede this year? 15? 20? Did he get shown up in any of the finals? Kosi didn't get a touch after quarter time in the first, he was just about our best in the second and was one of only 3 or 4 decent players in the prelim.

He never played on any teams gun forward. He played on the duds. I could get less than 10 goals kicked on me by the duds.
Brian Lake is the best defender. Liar.
 
Scarlett's there as he is the best defender in one of the best defences in the league. For the record, how many goals did he concede this year? 15? 20? Did he get shown up in any of the finals? Kosi didn't get a touch after quarter time in the first, he was just about our best in the second and was one of only 3 or 4 decent players in the prelim.

Scarlett had an ok year, but down on his standards to be honest. The guy is one of the best full backs in the history of the game but this year I dont honestly think he should be in the top 50 players, especially when you consider some of the players who were left out. Watson, Cross and Reiwodlt to name a few. I know Reiwoldt only played 15 games but Scarlett only played 18, and Roo had a major impact in more games than scarlett this year.
 
Everyone knows Sheahan is an idiot, but can someone explain how he is not even consistent in his own little head?

Case in point:

In his top 50 at the start of the season, Heath Shaw was the highest ranked Collingwood player, 20 something overall.

In his top 50 at the end of the season, Heath Shaw misses out and falls behind about 6 Collingwood players.

Compare Shaw's 2009 to 2010 and they are virtually identical. Shaw average 1 less possession per game this year, but he also starred in a Grand Final win. How could Shite possibly justify changing Shaw's rank so drastically?
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't think any of them were cheapies right in front. He nailed every single set shot. His one behind came when he grabbed the ball in congestion from a ball up and banged it on the boot without looking. ( I remember because he was 10.0 before it)

I saw him every game this year. His field kicking is certainly not elite, but it is far better than some people make it out to be. He still has an obligatory woeful shank every week, and it seems that is what most people remember and not him putting it on a leading forward's tit or a nice 50m lob over the top to a ruckman's chest.


209 kicks 363 handballs. Even Jobe knows his kicking is not at AFL standard.

I like this from Wikipeda "He was initially coached as a key forward by Kevin Sheedy, who also coached his father Tim. His poor kicking (by AFL standards) drew criticism, and it was determined he would be more suited to the midfield at Essendon".

50m lob? lol - He gives it everything and he is lucky to kick it 45 meters.
 
Firstly this opinion was right 3-4 years ago but now its way off.

Secondly your just sour because Watson destroyed you in round 17.

Firstly it is still correct - his kicks when he does kick are little 20 metre chips - anything further can go anywhere.

Secondly I am sour really sour - Essendon were the worst team in 2010 and we helped you into 14th.
 
Everyone knows Sheahan is an idiot, but can someone explain how he is not even consistent in his own little head?

Case in point:

In his top 50 at the start of the season, Heath Shaw was the highest ranked Collingwood player, 20 something overall.

In his top 50 at the end of the season, Heath Shaw misses out and falls behind about 6 Collingwood players.

Compare Shaw's 2009 to 2010 and they are virtually identical. Shaw average 1 less possession per game this year, but he also starred in a Grand Final win. How could Shite possibly justify changing Shaw's rank so drastically?



I know a lot of idiots. They don't have to be consistent in their own heads. They aren't. They don't understand themselves or what they're talking about. Ever. I have no idea why a thread about something Mike ****ing Sheahan has written is 13 pages long, the man cannot write or speak to save his life.
 
Didak at 14...???
LOL :rolleyes:

The guy could keep his jumper clean in a mud wrestling match.
I guess you don't have to get the hard ball when you're in Sheahan's top 20... :thumbsdown:
 
I've always thought he does the controversial selections on purpose just to create discussion. If everyone agreed, everyone would move on pretty quickly.

I'd be most interested to see a list that everyone agreed on. Would be quite something.
 
Didak at 14...???
LOL :rolleyes:

The guy could keep his jumper clean in a mud wrestling match.
I guess you don't have to get the hard ball when you're in Sheahan's top 20... :thumbsdown:

Why do you have to get the hardball to be top 20?

Oh sorry, forget you can't be good if you are a soft outside player.
 
Why do you have to get the hardball to be top 20?

Oh sorry, forget you can't be good if you are a soft outside player.
yeah hilarious isn't it. Didak could kick twice as many goals and make fools of twice as many opponents and never be considered worthy of top 20 status because he's not a hard nut. doesn't mean he's not brilliant
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mike Sheahans End Of Season Top 50 Players

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top