in the AFLW, do the umpires say "holding the man" ? if they do that would annoy me
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm still annoyed about the decision to make an 18th team in the GC instead of Tasmania. Not blaming the Suns or their supporters, but we should have rewarded a footballing state first before shoehorning another team into QLD.
in the AFLW, do the umpires say "holding the man" ? if they do that would annoy me
Amen to this. Old boss was a senior engineer there. Said the place was a shambles in terms of IT.All about lining their mates' pockets so they don't actually hire developers that know what they are doing
I think that would be okay actually as "man" can sometimes be used as a universal term (ie, mankind).
This is doubly infuriating when paired with the fact that the ball has to be travel 15 m to be payed a mark. They will pay a mark at 10 m all game and allow players to run 20 m at the same time.I am sure it has been mentioned on the thread….but players running too far without bouncing it.
The rule says 15 metres is allowable. Players routinely run more than that, often by a long way. Police the rule correctly or change it to amount of steps or amount of time or a longer distance. But don’t have a rule saying one thing and a convention allowing something else.
Not to mention the audacity of them allowing Richmond, Hawthorn and Collingwood supporters in when it's clearly called the MELBOURNE cricket club. It's even written out the front of the gorund.My pet peeve is the MCC allowing people to wear denim jeans in the MCC reserve. 99% of the time, these people just look like ' bums ' . Membership of the MCC is a privilege and members should dress the part.
I often go for a Formula 1 up the shops to grab a paperFlogs who call footy AFL. I don't go around saying "do you blokes play NBA?" do I?
fu** off with that sh*t.
pfft, i olympics after my kidsI often go for a Formula 1 up the shops to grab a paper
Breakdance?pfft, i olympics after my kids
"Holding the man" doesn't appear in the laws of the game. This is it:in the AFLW, do the umpires say "holding the man" ? if they do that would annoy me
That's a minor thing that annoys me about life; people say "No but 'man' in a gender-neutral sense" when they obviously just didn't expect any women in that role.I think that would be okay actually as "man" can sometimes be used as a universal term (ie, mankind).
For god's sake, it's a footy game, not a formal dinner party.My pet peeve is the MCC allowing people to wear denim jeans in the MCC reserve. 99% of the time, these people just look like ' bums ' . Membership of the MCC is a privilege and members should dress the part.
Umpires seem to be getting worse and worse at the centre bounce, and are letting more one-sided ones go than they used to. Normally it doesn't matter too much but there are some instances where the lopsided bounce clearly advantages one team.
(d) holds an opposition Player who is not in possession of the football; ;"Holding the man" doesn't appear in the laws of the game. This is it:
18.3.2 Free Kicks - Prohibited Contact
A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player when that Player makes any of the following Prohibited Contact with an opposition Player:
(a) executes a tackle that is not legal (refer to the definition of Legal Tackle)
Legal Tackle or Legally Tackled:
a tackle by a Player where:
(a) the Player being tackled is in possession of the football; and
(b) that Player is tackled below the shoulders and above the knees. For the avoidance of doubt, a Legal Tackle may be executed by holding (either by the body or playing uniform) a Player from the front, side or behind, provided that a Player held from behind is not pushed in the back.
Isn't it just obeying the law?Wearing masks when they sing the team song, Virtue signaling at its finest.