Minor things that annoy you about the game

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm sure I've mentioned it before, but a massive peeve of mine is the LED fences that flash, rotate, move, change colour, change to another advert etc when the ball is in play. Makes it incredibly hard to focus on the play if you're sitting on the bottom level and the ball is at the other end and I imagine could be challenging for the players at times as well. Fence advertising should just be still images that don't move and when there's a break in play by all means flick to the next one.
 
I think that would be okay actually as "man" can sometimes be used as a universal term (ie, mankind).

hahaha. Tell the feminists that…..the work title “Foreman” doesn’t exist anymore .
 
I am sure it has been mentioned on the thread….but players running too far without bouncing it.

The rule says 15 metres is allowable. Players routinely run more than that, often by a long way. Police the rule correctly or change it to amount of steps or amount of time or a longer distance. But don’t have a rule saying one thing and a convention allowing something else.
This is doubly infuriating when paired with the fact that the ball has to be travel 15 m to be payed a mark. They will pay a mark at 10 m all game and allow players to run 20 m at the same time.

It’s the same distance, I have no idea how they manage to get it so wrong all the time.
 
Umpires seem to be getting worse and worse at the centre bounce, and are letting more one-sided ones go than they used to. Normally it doesn't matter too much but there are some instances where the lopsided bounce clearly advantages one team.
 
My pet peeve is the MCC allowing people to wear denim jeans in the MCC reserve. 99% of the time, these people just look like ' bums ' . Membership of the MCC is a privilege and members should dress the part.
Not to mention the audacity of them allowing Richmond, Hawthorn and Collingwood supporters in when it's clearly called the MELBOURNE cricket club. It's even written out the front of the gorund.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

in the AFLW, do the umpires say "holding the man" ? if they do that would annoy me
"Holding the man" doesn't appear in the laws of the game. This is it:

18.3.2 Free Kicks - Prohibited Contact
A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player when that Player makes any of the following Prohibited Contact with an opposition Player:
(a) executes a tackle that is not legal (refer to the definition of Legal Tackle)

Legal Tackle or Legally Tackled:
a tackle by a Player where:
(a) the Player being tackled is in possession of the football; and
(b) that Player is tackled below the shoulders and above the knees. For the avoidance of doubt, a Legal Tackle may be executed by holding (either by the body or playing uniform) a Player from the front, side or behind, provided that a Player held from behind is not pushed in the back.
 
My pet peeve is the MCC allowing people to wear denim jeans in the MCC reserve. 99% of the time, these people just look like ' bums ' . Membership of the MCC is a privilege and members should dress the part.
For god's sake, it's a footy game, not a formal dinner party.
 
Umpires seem to be getting worse and worse at the centre bounce, and are letting more one-sided ones go than they used to. Normally it doesn't matter too much but there are some instances where the lopsided bounce clearly advantages one team.

Ray Chamberlain is the worst for this to the point that he takes an eternity to bounce the ball post goal and then still ****s it up. Just throw the ball up and be done with the bounce, some people like the bounce but if it was gone would they actually care enough to miss it?
 
"Holding the man" doesn't appear in the laws of the game. This is it:

18.3.2 Free Kicks - Prohibited Contact
A field Umpire shall award a Free Kick against a Player when that Player makes any of the following Prohibited Contact with an opposition Player:
(a) executes a tackle that is not legal (refer to the definition of Legal Tackle)

Legal Tackle or Legally Tackled:
a tackle by a Player where:
(a) the Player being tackled is in possession of the football; and
(b) that Player is tackled below the shoulders and above the knees. For the avoidance of doubt, a Legal Tackle may be executed by holding (either by the body or playing uniform) a Player from the front, side or behind, provided that a Player held from behind is not pushed in the back.
(d) holds an opposition Player who is not in possession of the football; ;

Not actually "holding the man", I guess "holding an opposition Player who was not in possession of the football" is a bit of a mouthful.
"Holding the player" would be a gender neutral abbreviation.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Minor things that annoy you about the game

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top