Mitchell Marsh

Remove this Banner Ad

After 4 years Steve Waugh averaged 30 with the bat and 40 with the ball. Good thing we didn't persist with him...
Marsh is now 27 Waugh was early 20s
Waugh played on pitches that the ball moved, waving the great hostile bowling attacks of the West Indies, Pakistan etc using a tooth pick

Marsh bats on doctored roads, roped on boundaries with most of the bowlers that would be classed as tomato throwers as best with a tree stump compared to what Waugh used
 

Log in to remove this ad.

LOL.

59 tests for 4 100s and an average of 35.

An absolutely outstanding white ball player, though. ODI and T20I record doesn't get nearly enough praise for how good it is. Would be in the frame for the World Cup if he hadn't retired.
He also had a bowling average of 33 to go with that.

Marsh would absolutely kill for Watson's numbers, they aren't even in the same discussion as far as I'm concerned.

Watson was a very handy test cricketer that unfortunately just struggled to turn his good scores into hundreds. He was at the top of his game when he was opening the batting. Marsh isn't even good enough to be in the top 6.

You can laugh at Watson's batting average all you like but it's actually even higher than Marsh's FC average.

Watson
Batting: 35
Bowling: 33

Marsh
Batting: 25
Bowling: 42

That's a pretty handy record there from Watson and we'd kill for him today.
 
That's a pretty handy record there from Watson and we'd kill for him today.
He was a very good player. Guess some people only know what they've got when it's gone!
 
Steve Waugh scored nearly 11,000 runs @ 51 and took 92 wickets @ 37.

I'm well aware he was more accomplished at the same age/number of tests as Marsh but he was nothing special for a while and became a test great and captain.

Just pointing out that it's entirely possible that Marsh won't average 26 forever. IMO he shouldn't have been in the squad for this series because his test/FC form didn't justify it, but given he was in the 13 he was the obvious pick for this test.

FWIW this is our current top 6 with their FC records in brackets.

Harris (35.5)
Finch (36)
Khawaja (43.9)
S Marsh (41)
Head (36.9)
M Marsh (31.9)

Recent picks:

Handscomb (38.7)
Labuschagne (33.2)
Bancroft (38.4)
Renshaw (37.8)
Maddinson (35.9)

All rounder competition:

Maxwell (41.1 - would have played 50 tests by now if he bowled 140km/h and not spin)
Cartwright (35.9)
Stoinis (33.6)
Agar (25.6)

Can we at least agree that Marsh is a Delaware in a top 6 full of Ruby Lous and Royal Blues? Andrew Symonds averaged 40 from 26 tests and isn't really thought of as a good test cricketer because he played in such a strong era. He'd be our best player in the top 6 right now. Ideally Marsh or any other all rounder at 6 averages 40-45 with the bat and 30-40 with the ball as a 5-10 overs an innings on average contributor. But ****, if someone can average 40-45 in our current top 6 then it doesn't matter if they can bowl...

For complete accuracy, the Shield batting records for each player you mentioned, along with bowling for all-rounders, plus a couple of others:

1. Aaron Finch - 31.08 (3 hundreds, 21 fifties)
2. Marcus Harris - 35.32 (9 hundreds, 16 fifties)
3. Usman Khawaja - 50.07 (12 hundreds, 19 fifties)
4. Shaun Marsh - 41.59 (14 hundreds, 25 fifties)
5. Travis Head - 36.08 (7 hundreds, 21 fifties)
6. Mitch Marsh - 28.02 (3 centuries, 11 fifties)
7. Tim Paine - 27.79 (1 hundred, 19 fifties)

Peter Handscomb - 40.13 (10 hundreds, 21 fifties)
Marnus Labuschagne - 33.88 (4 centuries, 14 fifties)
Cameron Bancroft - 38.83 (9 centuries, 9 fifties)
Matthew Renshaw - 38.13 (6 hundreds, 6 fifties)
Nick Maddinson - 34.57 (7 hundreds, 7 fifties)
Kurtis Patterson - 41.48 (6 hundreds, 23 fifties)
Joe Burns - 43.06 (12 hundreds, 28 fifties)
Matthew Wade - 39.77 (11 centuries, 32 fifties)

Hilton Cartwright
Batting - 39.50 (4 centuries, 11 fifties)
Bowling - 54.50 average, 79.61 strike rate, 4.10 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Glenn Maxwell
Batting - 44.15 (4 centuries, 18 fifties)
Bowling - 42.97 average, 80.53 strike rate, 3.20 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Marcus Stoinis
Batting - 33.83 (3 centuries, 18 fifties)
Bowling - 43.72 average, 76.33 strike rate, 3.44 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Ashton Agar
Batting - 25.00 (2 centuries, 7 fifties)
Bowling - 39.73 average, 76.92 strike rate, 3.09 economy rate (5 5-fers)
 
LOL.

59 tests for 4 100s and an average of 35.

An absolutely outstanding white ball player, though. ODI and T20I record doesn't get nearly enough praise for how good it is. Would be in the frame for the World Cup if he hadn't retired.

He’d be our best player right now quite comfortably, I said it years ago and everyone disagreed but Mitch marsh will never go close to the heights of shame Watson.

Watson's career Shield record (54 matches):

Batting - 41.80 (9 hundreds, 16 fifties)
Bowling - 25.95 average, 44.79 strike rate, 3.47 economy rate (7 5-fers)

Shows the gap between he and Marsh (Marsh's numbers can be found here), before you even consider their limited overs records. They're the sort of numbers you would want and expect from Marsh at Shield level, to justify the hype and justify his Test selection as an all-rounder.

Watson was a seriously good and damaging bowler (more than just the robotic "run saver" he eventually became) in his younger years (before injuries), probably worthy of selection on that alone.
 
For complete accuracy, the Shield batting records for each player you mentioned, along with bowling for all-rounders, plus a couple of others:

1. Aaron Finch - 31.08 (3 hundreds, 21 fifties)
2. Marcus Harris - 35.32 (9 hundreds, 16 fifties)
3. Usman Khawaja - 50.07 (12 hundreds, 19 fifties)
4. Shaun Marsh - 41.59 (14 hundreds, 25 fifties)
5. Travis Head - 36.08 (7 hundreds, 21 fifties)
6. Mitch Marsh - 28.02 (3 centuries, 11 fifties)
7. Tim Paine - 27.79 (1 hundred, 19 fifties)

Peter Handscomb - 40.13 (10 hundreds, 21 fifties)
Marnus Labuschagne - 33.88 (4 centuries, 14 fifties)
Cameron Bancroft - 38.83 (9 centuries, 9 fifties)
Matthew Renshaw - 38.13 (6 hundreds, 6 fifties)
Nick Maddinson - 34.57 (7 hundreds, 7 fifties)
Kurtis Patterson - 41.48 (6 hundreds, 23 fifties)
Joe Burns - 43.06 (12 hundreds, 28 fifties)
Matthew Wade - 39.77 (11 centuries, 32 fifties)

Hilton Cartwright
Batting - 39.50 (4 centuries, 11 fifties)
Bowling - 54.50 average, 79.61 strike rate, 4.10 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Glenn Maxwell
Batting - 44.15 (4 centuries, 18 fifties)
Bowling - 42.97 average, 80.53 strike rate, 3.20 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Marcus Stoinis
Batting - 33.83 (3 centuries, 18 fifties)
Bowling - 43.72 average, 76.33 strike rate, 3.44 economy rate (0 5-fers)

Ashton Agar
Batting - 25.00 (2 centuries, 7 fifties)
Bowling - 39.73 average, 76.92 strike rate, 3.09 economy rate (5 5-fers)
Damon interesting your figures show Maxwell as 2nd in the batting averages at 44.15 but how many shield games has he played.
 
Watson's career Shield record (54 matches):

Batting - 41.80 (9 hundreds, 16 fifties)
Bowling - 25.95 average, 44.79 strike rate, 3.47 economy rate (7 5-fers)

Shows the gap between he and Marsh, before you even consider their limited overs records. They're the sort of numbers you would want and expect from Marsh at Shield level, to justify the hype and justify his Test selection as an all-rounder.

Watson was a seriously good and damaging bowler (more than just the robotic "run saver" he eventually became) in his younger years (before injuries), probably worthy of selection on that alone.

Watson was an excellent bowler but injury took its toll on his body and he became a part timer. He was a bit like Ryan Harris in that he's not that tall but generated his pace from his upper body strength. He suits limited overs bowling a bit like Andrew Tye because he is accurate and ha plenty of variation but when he has to bowl 20 or 30 overs with the batsman not needing to score quickly he's easier to get away bowling 130s.

Out of interest how many Shield games did Marsh play before his test debut and how many since? Do you have that info and his record before/since making his test debut
 
On Shield record and current form Wade has every right to be miffed to not be in the squad.

I'd like to see Wade selected as a pure batsman, and possibly take Shaun Marsh's #4 spot. I feel like without the responsibility and workload of keeping, he'll do better as a batsman at Test level than he has previously. He'll at least show a bit more grit and leadership than the elder Marsh.
 
Out of interest how many Shield games did Marsh play before his test debut and how many since? Do you have that info and his record before/since making his test debut

Don't really have those splits readily available unfortunately.

I do recall early doors in Shield cricket, Mitch Marsh seemed to be a bit of a no-rounder, batting at #7-#8, but rarely being given a bowl either. It was almost like he was being picked at Shield level, without being given much to do, just to justify eventual international selection on potential alone.
 
Last edited:

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I'd like to see Wade selected as a pure batsman, and possibly take Shaun Marsh's #4 spot. I feel like without the responsibility and workload of keeping, he'll do better as a batsman at Test level than he has previously. He'll at least show a bit more grit and leadership than the elder Marsh.

As far as I know the squad for Sydney is the same as the Melbourne squad.I think the current 11,Handscomb,Siddle and Tremain.If they need a 2nd spinner for Sydney I can not see any one who stands out.I thought they might have rested 1 of the fast bowlers but it looks like they will not bowl again in this match if India force the follow on.
 
Damon interesting your figures show Maxwell as 2nd in the batting averages at 44.15 but how many shield games has he played.

41 matches, 69 innings, 6 not outs. A decent sample size, but he's never really gotten a full Shield season at any stage to properly press his case, due to international limited overs commitments.

I would like to see him get some Test opportunities on home soil, though. All 7 of the Tests he's played have been outside of Australia.

As far as I know the squad for Sydney is the same as the Melbourne squad.I think the current 11,Handscomb,Siddle and Tremain.

Perhaps Wade at #4 and Maxwell at #6 for the Sri Lanka Test series?
 
Damon interesting your figures show Maxwell as 2nd in the batting averages at 44.15 but how many shield games has he played.
I'd be guessing between 40 and 50. Has 54 FC games outside of tests, but a few would have been tour games and has played for Yorkshire and Hampshire in county cricket (although I'm not sure if any of those would be FC games).
 
I'd like to see Wade selected as a pure batsman, and possibly take Shaun Marsh's #4 spot. I feel like without the responsibility and workload of keeping, he'll do better as a batsman at Test level than he has previously. He'll at least show a bit more grit and leadership than the elder Marsh.

He's one of the only ones legitimately putting his hand up at Shield level. Can't ask for more than that.
 
Don't really have those splits readily available unfortunately.

I do recall early doors in Shield cricket, Mitch Marsh seemed to be a bit of a no-rounder, batting at #7-#8, but rarely being given a bowl either. It was almost like he was being picked at Shield level, without being given much to do, just to justify eventual international selection on potential alone.

Marsh has been screwed around ever since he won the U19 World Cup for Australia. They basically went "wow, obvious talent with bat and ball, let's just chuck him in straight away!" so he kept getting picked as the fourth paceman in a fairly ordinary WA side. He actually did well on debut, batting at 5 and scoring a 59*, while not bowling, which is exactly what he should've continued doing as he developed. Instead they focused on his bowling, which hasn't been the same since his injuries, and he's not as good of a batsman as he could've been - especially because he's been going between formats so often because of his obvious skill and classical, yet powerful hitting.
 
Don't really have those splits readily available unfortunately.

I do recall early doors in Shield cricket, Mitch Marsh seemed to be a bit of a no-rounder, batting at #7-#8, but rarely being given a bowl either. It was almost like he was being picked at Shield level, without being given much to do, just to justify eventual international selection on potential alone.

Having a look the old fashioned way:

18/19 - 4 matches 264 @ 37.7 (6 wickets @ 62)
17/18 - 6 matches 424 @ 38.5 (6 wickets @ 30)
16/17 - 2 matches 26 @ 6.5
15/16 - 1 match 51 @ 51
14/15 - 1 match 2* @ -

4 1/2 Shield seasons and he's played a total of 14 matches. I know he's been in and out of the test side but even his brother has had 11 match seasons.

Performances have been better without being anything to write home about (one half century in one match is as pointless as 2* in one match) but I'd like to have seen his 17/18 or 18/19 across a full Shield season.
 
It's odd that he continually gets selected in test match cricket where he's struggled a lot, but he hasn't been picked in ODI's where he actually has a very good record.

He was rested from the ODI series to allow him time to play first class cricket whilst any competition for his spot had to play ODIs and T20Is
 
The 4th innings of this test match should be Mitch's last chance at test level. It will be his 53rd test innings, more than enough to show he is clearly no where near test level.

In that time the only time he's been able to score his two hundreds, we've posted scores of over 600 and declared so they were proven roads.

His record overall is pathetic for a player that has been gifted as many games as he has. He is not banging down the door at FC level. He has not passed 16 once in his last 9 test innings. There is absolutely nothing that suggests that he should be in the 11.

I was really disappointed to see a home crowd boo one of our own. It was embarrassing that we would do that. But it's obvious the public is fed up with it. Give someone else a go and see if they are up to it.
 
He was rested from the ODI series to allow him time to play first class cricket whilst any competition for his spot had to play ODIs and T20Is
He's played 7 ODI's in 2 years. Finch has had 19. That's not being "rested", that's being dropped
Yeah but you are clearly missing the fact that Khawaja doesn't have a bowling average of 33
And even then, Khawaja is a far better player. More hundreds in less tests, more reliable in the cordon. And Khawaja is our 4th best player behind Lyon, Cummins and (IMO) Starc.
 
He's played 7 ODI's in 2 years. Finch has had 19. That's not being "rested", that's being dropped

And even then, Khawaja is a far better player. More hundreds in less tests, more reliable in the cordon. And Khawaja is our 4th best player behind Lyon, Cummins and (IMO) Starc.
He may well have more overall hundreds, as much as Watto had an issue with turning his 50's into hundreds, he was fairly consistent over his career. He had 24 career 50's.

If I were to pick the best pure batsman of the two than Khawaja probably gets the nod, but I'd take Watson's batting as well as his 75 wickets at 33 ahead of Khawaja and there is no way in the world Watson was not as good as Khawaja in the field.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Mitchell Marsh

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top