Comment is spot onComment hasn't aged well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Comment is spot onComment hasn't aged well.
If we cop multiple suspensions Tigers may be back in the running but otherwise it will be Bombers with the Stringer angle to promote it .Slight chance of Heavenly Swans versus evil Giants another angle that could be promoted .. Watch them promote Port v Hawks after fining Kenny 20,,000.Nothing surer.I assume all the big VIC clubs are now demanding they play the Giants in the first few rounds.
Men really do have it tough in the workplace.100% this. Approaching a member of female staff to ask them about a work-related issue they caused is fraught with danger. You basically have to remain expressionless and speak without any emotion. Even if they have in fact caused the issue.
Twin Towers is literally one of the most joked about events on the internet. You type "9/11" into Instragram right now and you will see thousands and thousands of jokes about it. The Family Guy clip has been posted, the Norm McDonald joke is posted. In his most recent comedy show Shane Gillis does a hilarious joke about an Australian in the twin towers on 9/11 "oh ****, get down - naaauuurrr" Bizarre that people find it offensive.Why would you dress up as twin towers geez like that isn’t going to ruffle a few feathers ey
Why would you dress up as twin towers geez like that isn’t going to ruffle a few feathers ey
Hahahahaahaha congratulations on the dumbest post I’ve seen on BigFootyEight things we learned: These young Cats mids are rising fast
The Eagles are soaring, Geelong's young midfield is deadly plus more round six lessonswww.afl.com.au
So it's okay for AFL media to refer to a duo of players as "The Twin Towers" but not okay for AFL players to dress as them?
And there is no right to freedom from consequences.What are you actually on about?
As Jim Spigelman (one of Australia's grreatest legal minds) once said, there is no right not to be offended. That is the very essence of free speech.
Want to use big words like reducive? Possibly the most reducive thing I have read on this thread is you saying the threshold for what is acceptable expression through soeech or behaviour is that if one person out of thousands or millions is offended, it crosses that threshold.
And make sure you don’t do it alone, because that could be misinterpreted. And don’t do it on a group, because that’s too public.100% this. Approaching a member of female staff to ask them about a work-related issue they caused is fraught with danger. You basically have to remain expressionless and speak without any emotion. Even if they have in fact caused the issue.