Bluelegs
Digging into the why
One thing you'll notice watching Tarantino movies is the way violence is portrayed towards victims vs perpetrators is completely different. The slapstick violence is reserved for the latter. For the former he's actually a lot more reserved and shies away from showing it in an exploitative way, often it's more suggestive and disturbing.The most extraordinary part of this is Conor Idon being fined for doing a act from a popular movie that I would guess may on this board have watched many times. Tarantino treatment of a sensitive subjective is ironic, funny, moving at times but filled with gauge, over the top violence and mayhem. Its irreverent. For me I love his dialogue but sometimes the violence is too slapstick.
Now the AFL, in this case I will guess the majority of people involved in handing down sanctions are white middles class people. Obviously Dillon is. Its stunningly wrong to me that they feel they can judge a black man, who took the time to discuss this with the other black men before going ahead, for dressing up as a black character to do a scene from Django.
This is a serious overstep by the AFL and too me extremely ignorant. They have no right to make this judgement.
I find the punishment over the Django stuff to be the most perplexing.