MRP / Trib. Nankervis Straight To Tribunal

[captain blood 17]

Degoey was 4 games ago, not 4 years.

The AFL is not in the habit of grading these type of incidents deliberate. They are extremely careless incidents in terms of contact to the head, but it will be seen as careless, rather than deliberate.

Under current Tribunal rules, reported players are entitled to use precedents from the current season in their arguments and DeGoey is the most relevant precedent to the Nankervis case, where the reported player clearly elects to bump and it is a step after the concussed player has released the ball. The action is the same. The result is the same. The timing is the same.

The Tribunal is not able to say things have changed in the last 5 weeks due to other cases occurring similar to this in that time. In fact the opposite is the case. They are now bound by the outcomes of those cases. To do otherwise would be perfectly reasonable grounds for appeal.

No error the AFL Tribunal makes shocks me now after the farcical Mansell case, but if they gave Nankervis more than the recent DeGoey bump then it would most certainly be inequitable as the two incidents are the same in all important factors and so the Tribunal is bound by the precedent case.

Pretty sure under AFL guidelines they don’t consider previous incidents or rulings (dead set, it’s in their guidelines).

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Pretty sure under AFL guidelines they don’t consider previous incidents or rulings (dead set, it’s in their guidelines).

Below are the current guidelines on player who have been charged using precedents. If the DeGoey incident is not on the list of acceptable precedents the Tribunal provides it would clearly be an unreasonable exclusion....

 

[captain blood 17]

Below are the current guidelines on player who have been charged using precedents. If the DeGoey incident is not on the list of acceptable precedents the Tribunal provides it would clearly be an unreasonable exclusion....


View attachment 1731895

That’s good follow up. Thank you. We’ll see how it goes.

 

[Truetiger]

Afl will argue 4, we'll plead guilty and ask for 3. Our ******* lawyer will drop the ball again and he'll get 4.

Cripps lawyer problem solved

 

[shaky]

Omfg.
SEN all saying Nank ran past the ball to take out Lloyd and it is the worst bump this year.
Lloyd took the ball and hand passed moments before Nank got there.
No he should have braces for a bump/contact, we learnt that from Mansel, but his intention wasn’t to take Lloyd out from the start.
Why is it every time one of our players go up for these things the media go out of their way to make it sound and look much worse than it actually was????

 

[Groupie_]

Omfg.
SEN all saying Nank ran past the ball to take out Lloyd and it is the worst bump this year.
Lloyd took the ball and hand passed moments before Nank got there.
No he should have braces for a bump/contact, we learnt that from Mansel, but his intention wasn’t to take Lloyd out from the start.
Why is it every time one of our players go up for these things the media go out of their way to make it sound and look much worse than it actually was????

Richmond tax

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Omfg.
SEN all saying Nank ran past the ball to take out Lloyd and it is the worst bump this year.
Lloyd took the ball and hand passed moments before Nank got there.
No he should have braces for a bump/contact, we learnt that from Mansel, but his intention wasn’t to take Lloyd out from the start.
Why is it every time one of our players go up for these things the media go out of their way to make it sound and look much worse than it actually was????

Did they explain how it was worse than the Degoey bump?

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

ill be mental if its 4

dog stewart got 4 and that was 100 times worse

Dwayne kane Gerard Lane just compared it too Dog Stewarts.

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

Because since then the issue of going past the ball to make contact has been heightened and Nankervis has form. Did you know for example he is the number 1 player in the comp for free kicks against?
it was deliberate, intentional, high contact and knocked the bloke out/concussed him.
Forget DeGoey, worry about Nank and his dumb actions as a leader.

He didn't go past the ball.lol
Lloyd got rid of the ball a sec beforehand.
Will get 3

 

[smasha]

He didn't go past the ball.lol
Lloyd got rid of the ball a sec beforehand.
Will get 3

4 I reckon,Richmond tax.

Going past the ball isn’t an offence for a legal sheppherd.

Nank ,being a big lug ,doesn’t know how strong he is and will pay for it.

Ryan or Soldo to come in.

Nank is our captain so that’s how high in regard he is at Tigerland.

Brilliant game by him Thirsday despite the bump.

 

[Meteoric Rise]

Dwayne kane Gerard Lane just compared it too Dog Stewarts.

The main differences between the two incidents are:

1. Nankervis took one step after Lloyd disposed of the ball. This was like Degoey. Stewart took 3 steps after he realised that Prestia was tapping the ball onto a different line.

2. Lloyd had possession of the ball initially so Nankervis had a reason to be running at his body, where Prestia never took possession of the ball, and Stewart had no legitimate reason to be running at the player and not the ball.

The main similarities between the two incidents is the horrendous head first bumping technique where the bumping player should be leading with the hip, and the main contact is with the head in both cases, and the victim is concussed in both cases. The Degoey bump also employed this shocking head first bumping action with no hip contact, also main contact to head, also victim concussed.

 

[Tiger_Of_Old]

The main differences between the two incidents are:

1. Nankervis took one step after Lloyd disposed of the ball. This was like Degoey. Stewart took 3 steps after he realised that Prestia was tapping the ball onto a different line.

2. Lloyd had possession of the ball initially so Nankervis had a reason to be running at his body, where Prestia never took possession of the ball, and Stewart had no legitimate reason to be running at the player and not the ball.

The main similarities between the two incidents is the horrendous head first bumping technique where the bumping player should be leading with the hip, and the main contact is with the head in both cases, and the victim is concussed in both cases. The Degoey bump also employed this shocking head first bumping action with no hip contact, also main contact to head, also victim concussed.

Just shits me and at a guess all Tigers is any hint of comparison too the Dogs act.

 

[BF Tiger]

MRO should stop wasting our time. Still grade it as careless, high, high and suggest that under normal circumstances this would go direct to the tribunal, but given previous similar incident(s) this year that act as precedence we offer a three week penalty.

 

[Sir_Loin]

Can’t believe this has gone to the tribunal why even have a MRO he’s fukn useless

Will get four weeks with the Richmond tax. Bookmark it

 

[Groupie_]

MRO should stop wasting our time. Still grade it as careless, high, high and suggest that under normal circumstances this would go direct to the tribunal, but given previous similar incident(s) this year that act as precedence we offer a three week penalty.

they want the theatre

 

[All Aust]

Our ******* lawyer will drop the ball again

Yup. Fumblegutz will find a way to kick it out further.

 

[Jedi Tiger]

The flipping carry on by the media

 

[Groupie_]

surely tovey isnt our lawyer anymore

bloke looses every case

 

[smasha]

surely tovey isnt our lawyer anymore

bloke looses every case

I’ll get lose if he looses this one.

 

[Daka]

It's a lesser offense than what Broad did so it has to be 3 weeks or under, if he gets 4 weeks it a joke.

 

[Truetiger]

4 I reckon,Richmond tax.

Going past the ball isn’t an offence for a legal sheppherd.

Nank ,being a big lug ,doesn’t know how strong he is and will pay for it.

Ryan or Soldo to come in.

Nank is our captain so that’s how high in regard he is at Tigerland.

Brilliant game by him Thirsday despite the bump.

The question is who should come in? Ryan or Soldo. This time around maybe Soldo.

 

[Elton Johns Wig]

Who's our lawyer again?

We need new counsel. Our arguments have been terrible. Seriously terrible. Embarrassing.

 

[Gunit]

Surely we’ll be leading the 2023 suspension ladder once Toby gets sentenced.

 

[Drunken Wookie]

We need new counsel. Our arguments have been terrible. Seriously terrible. Embarrassing.

isnt benny a lawyer?

 

[Mr Unbelievable]

Who's our lawyer again?